this post was submitted on 22 Jun 2025
108 points (87.0% liked)

No Stupid Questions

42094 readers
979 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Considering Israel and the US are bombing Iran's nuclear facilities because they have "weapons of mass destruction", if Iran really did have such weapons, wouldn't bombing the facilities they're held in cause them to explode, or cause an evident ripple at least? I may be imagining this in a way cartoonier way than military weapons actually work, but I'm preparing myself for some incredibly annoying debates.

(page 2) 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 weeks ago

You can read IAEA's press releases for each attack. They go through the precise function and nature of each building and access the potential danger. Though they haven't updated for the US's latest bombing.

[–] [email protected] 61 points 2 weeks ago
  1. They are bombing precisely because they haven’t got any weapons. If they had weapons, their nuclear weapons programme wouldn’t be attacked. This is how N Korea gets away with its shit. The attack is because they almost have nuclear weapons, and is intended to ensure the programme doesn’t bear fruit.

  2. Nuclear weapons need a very precisely placed and timed set of shaped explosions within the device in order to ram the material together in such a way as to achieve fission. Nuclear weapons cannot be detonated by exterior explosions, fire, earthquake, hurricane or anything else other than its own detonation system.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

Most likely not, I'd be more worried about local ground contamination from enriched uranium now being exposed.

Nuclear bombs have many safety features built in just for these reasons, enemy bombs you, you don't want your own nukes going off on your land.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

Most likely not, I'd be more worried about local ground contamination from enriched uranium now being exposed.

Nuclear bombs have many safety features built in just for these reasons, enemy bombs you, you don't want your own nukes going off on your land.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Reminder that the US accidentally dropped a nuclear bomb on itself but since it wasn't armed it didn't explode.

But also the most qualified nuclear inspectors on the planet say Iran doesn't have nukes.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 53 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

A nuclear bomb requires precise explosions delivered by shaped charges to achieve fission. You could strap C4 to the sides of a nuke and set them off, and you probably wouldn't create a nuclear explosion. It's a very delicate kind of weapon with very sophisticated engineering.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 2 weeks ago

And even "precise" would be understating it. Not only is a specific shape of the detonation required, but timing is crucial too. Otherwise you'll end up with a fizzle.

But yes, the main concern is nuclear contamination in the target area.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 weeks ago

Nuclear weapons require very precise detonators to explode, unlike conventional exposives which generally require only heat (and can blow up in the way you describe).

It's unclear, but most international experts agree that Iran has not yet actually put the nuclear material into any detonators. The problem is that Iran has been refining and stockpiling nuclear payloads, which could fairly easily be put into a bomb. That's what most of the world wants to prevent.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

From my understanding, Iran doesn't have nuclear weapons yet. What they destroyed is essentially a factory that creates one of the key ingredients required for making nuclear weapons. It's not a weapon yet, and it's not explosive yet. Iran's still a ways away from making that.

I super highly recommend William Spaniel on YouTube. He hasn't covered this bombing yet (I'm sure he will ~~within a few hours~~ tomorrow), but a few days ago he did briefly go over the process of making nuclear bombs, you should check it out: https://youtu.be/XA1CQp_oJ90?t=480

Either way it's an amazing channel for understanding world affairs, I really can't recommend it enough. Go watch any of his recent videos, they're short and well worth it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

So we gave them a nuke abortion?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (3 children)

US intelligence repeatedly states Iran is not building a nuclear weapon, and there is no evidence any actions have been related to a nuclear bomb since 2003. They do have nuclear power plants, heavy water plants, etc which enriched uranium is used for though. The US is so aware of this, that they buy heavy water from Iran.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

You’re missing a word there. US assessment is that Iran is not currently building nuclear weapons. The nuclear weapons programme has been frozen for many years. However it is still actively generating the materials required to assemble a weapon, and if the programme is reactivated it won’t take long to get to a working weapon.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Iran has consistently hid nuclear refinement facilities from international inspection, and there have been numerous reports of materials and facilities that serve no civilian purpose over the past 20 years, when such activity is in violation of international agreements.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Iran is a member of the Treaty Against Nuclear Proliferation and as such has international oversight into its nuclear programs. If they actually did have a nuclear weapons program, Team America World Police and Israel wouldn't be the ones telling the world. This is all a lie to bomb more brown people.

FWIW, Israel has never signed this treaty.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago

Yes spot on, not to mention UN and IAEA investigators regularly poking around. Though I don't think the IAEA will be welcome anymore after evidence emerged of them being compromised by Israel

[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 weeks ago

Not necessarily. Nuclear weapons generally require fairly precise timing in order to go critical and properly explode.

If the timing is off, it'll still spread nuclear material around, but it won't make the large mushroom cloud style explosion.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)
  1. No it likely wouldn't make them explode if they hypothetically were there.

  2. It's reasonably certain that Iran didn't and doesn't have any usable nukes at the moment. The claim is that they were working on building them and that the bombing was to stop them from completing any such projects.

  3. There are conflicting opinions about whether they were really working on building nukes. One might reasonably also say that if they weren't working on it before, they are NOW.

  4. IIRC there was some kind of religious fatwa against Iran building nukes, which made the claim somewhat credible that they weren't building them. It looked to me like they were instead getting the precursor materials together without doing the final refining and assembly, so that if the fatwa was lifted and the clerics said build the nukes, they could do so relatively quickly. That's just me though, and I don't have any special sources of info.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 2 weeks ago

Nuclear weapons require extremely specific events to successfully detonate, blowing them up with explosives will destroy the mechanisms that make it possible. It will most likely spread the nuclear fuel out though by breaking the shielding and structure that was keeping the radioactive material on the inside.

[–] [email protected] 86 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

No. That's not how it works. It could spread nuclear material though.

Edit: if it existed where they're claiming, which it doesn't.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

Pretty much the only people who claim it doesn’t exist is Iran. The only reason the UN can’t verify is because anytime they do surprise inspections they aren’t allowed into the facilities. No need to bury your refinement facilities 300 feet underground if you are making energy grade nuclear materials.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 weeks ago (7 children)

Trumps own head of intelligence says they're years away.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›