this post was submitted on 10 Jan 2024
3 points (100.0% liked)

3DPrinting

15595 readers
63 users here now

3DPrinting is a place where makers of all skill levels and walks of life can learn about and discuss 3D printing and development of 3D printed parts and devices.

The r/functionalprint community is now located at: [email protected] or [email protected]

There are CAD communities available at: [email protected] or [email protected]

Rules

If you need an easy way to host pictures, https://catbox.moe/ may be an option. Be ethical about what you post and donate if you are able or use this a lot. It is just an individual hosting content, not a company. The image embedding syntax for Lemmy is ![](URL)

Moderation policy: Light, mostly invisible

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Why are 3D printers still stuck on stepper motors? Why haven't we transitioned to servo motors with encoder feedback for positioning?

Is it just too cost prohibitive for the consumer-level? We would be able to print a lot faster and more accurately if we had position feedback on the axes. Instead we just rely blindly on the stepper not skipping any steps when we tell it to move, hoping for the best.

top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (2 children)

In addition to the other points made… steppers maintain full torque even when it’s not moving, so it’s better at braking tool heads.

Also? Steppers have a higher precision to a servos higher speed and torque (but torque that’s not constant.)

Finally they have a better response time. This isn’t the speed, so much as the speed that control inputs are reflected. Imagine all the tiny wibbles a printer makes during infill, the changes in direction would be sloppier with a servo.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I disagree with all your points. What kind of servos are you talking about?

BLDC and AC servos maintain full torque at stop too, and have about 2-3× the torque of a stepper of similar size.

The only way a stepper can rival a servo for precision is with a high degree of microstepping, which is far from guaranteed positioning with open loop control.

I haven't directly compared response time between steppers and servos, but I would be extremely surprised if there's a significant enough difference to worry about. Most servo-controlled machines are larger and so are designed to accelerate slower than a printer, if that's what you mean. This is intentional because inertia is a thing you have to worry about, not because the servo reacts to command changes slowly.

There are valid reasons steppers are used on printers, but it's not because they have superior performance.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

BLDC and AC servos maintain full torque at stop too, and have about 2-3× the torque of a stepper of similar size.

Huh, this is true about BLDCs as well? I remember seeing in a video that BLDCs tend to have very poor torque output when stopped and especially when at low speeds (due to very low efficiency requiring too high currents for drivers to supply), whereas AC motors have a pretty much flat torque curve until they get fairly fast. I'd be interested to know if this is true.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Steppers have a higher precision to a servos higher speed and torque (but torque that’s not constant.)

Just trying to understand this. Then how come all CNC precision machines use a servo instead of a stepper? I mean there are some ridiculously accurate machines that can position itself over and over varying under a micron (<.001mm) but the manufacturers choose servo over stepper. Is it for the sake of holding torque that servos have to be used over steppers?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

All the DIY CNC machines I've seen use larger stepper motors. The commercial CNC machines I've seen can cost $10,000 to hundreds of thousands.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

It seems like the argument is that at the lower price bracket, stepper motors offer higher performance than what a equivalently priced servo+encoder+controller combo can perform.

I felt like what I was reading in this thread wasn't matching up with that I see out in industry... concerns about 'price' didn't come up until your post.

Diamond turning machines are inherently low torque, low speed, AND nanoscale operations which uses servos for driving its respective axis. See precitech -youtube and in stark comparison Roeder's 5axis optical mold machining. Wire EDM's were all driven by servo motors until linear motors became popular. Even those famous JingDiao test samples are made on machines driven by servos.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Have you seen how fast printers with stepper motors can get? They print benchies in less than 3 minutes. The bottleneck is not the motion system, it's either the hot-end or the part cooling. Also stepper are super accurate and very flexible. Drivers are advanced and can tune for torque, speed, sound etc. Collision detection and skipped step detection is also a thing.