this post was submitted on 04 Jun 2025
342 points (99.4% liked)

politics

23920 readers
2511 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The judge overseeing the case of wrongly deported Kilmar Abrego Garcia on Wednesday granted a request from his attorneys to file a motion seeking sanctions against the government for failing to comply with discovery requests.

U.S. District Judge Paula Xinis in April ordered the Trump administration to provide discovery evidence showing the process by which Abrego Garcia was mistakenly deported to his native El Salvador despite him being issued a 2019 court order barring his deportation to his home country due to the fear of persecution.

Wednesday's order from Xinis comes after Abrego Garcia's attorneys said in a court filing that some of the discovery productions by the government include "highly redacted internal messages" and other materials that were classified as "Confidential or Attorney's Eyes Only" -- without a motion to designate the items as being under seal.

top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago

This is going to HELP because Trump's Government is KNOWN to Follow Judge's Orders!

[–] [email protected] 97 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Judges need to start holding people in contempt and locking them up till Kilmar Abrego Garcia is back in the US. Then the agents and their supervisors need to be charged with kidnapping and wrongful imprisonment.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That would be a possible outcome but the fun one is the judges ability to prevent the normal withholding of evidence that isn't directly requested. Instead the judge can say I (we both counsel and the judge) need to see everything and you can't say no, anything but provided can be held directly against you and anything that should exist that doesn't can be held as spoliated.

It's a public docket so that would be fairly disastrous for every ice or hsi arrest.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 days ago

And what happens when they still say no?

They need to actually be sent to jail to fear being sent.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

While they absolutely at least should be seen trying. Unfortunately this criminal administration will just pardon them. Until the legislative branch decides to do absolutely anything, expect nothing.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Pardons apply to criminal contempt but not civil contempt. What could happen is that the executive branch could refuse to carry out the contempt order. If that happens, it’s basically game over.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

Fair enough. But yeah, if they're expecting the administration to hold itself responsible. Heh shits fucked.

[–] [email protected] 41 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

But that would set a precedent that people in power can have consequences to their actions!

[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yes. So LET'S FUCKING SEE IT!

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

These courts exist to serve capital; not the people. That's why you don't see shit.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 2 days ago (1 children)

this poor guy is going to wind up dead or missing to make the headache go away for trump's benefit

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago (3 children)

How is he not already dead? Do we have any confirmation?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

US Senator Van Hallen (from Maryland) flew down to El Salvador managed to see him after applying a bunch of pressure in mid April. So he was at least alive then. Photos were published and such of said meeting

Other dems from congress have flow down besides Van Hallen, but haven't been able to get a visit. They've also had a ton less media attention, so there was less pressure on El Salvador to let them visit him. For instance, Glenn Ivey traveled to El Salvador and tried to visit a week ago but I doubt most people here probably heard about that

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

Well I've definitely heard of Van Halen but I thought they broke up

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yes. He was briefly released for an interview with a democratic senator who visited. This was weeks ago, though.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago

I've seen nothing recent showing him.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 days ago

Make sure to get back to us all here as soon as you discover any relevant information!

[–] [email protected] 53 points 2 days ago

He gets most attention, but apparently 90% off then didn't even have any conviction and even those who did maybe should be deported to their home country not to a gulag.

And no matter how much they say they are guilty, all deserve a due process. In a democratic country you can't just let someone decide who gets it and who doesn't.

Fuck this administration.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 days ago (1 children)

A reasonable president wouldn't have sent him in the first place. A reasonable president would be asking for him back, offering favorable diplomatic terms.

If refused, as Trump has claimed, a reasonable president would be parking a carrier group off the coast of Acajutia, and having F/A-18s doing nightly, low-altitude, glass-breaking, supersonic passes over Casa Presidencial.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 days ago

They're not being held against the US government's will, we're paying these countries to house these people. We could just request them back at any time. No military needed. These people are there because we purposely sent them there to forget about them.