this post was submitted on 04 Jun 2025
53 points (98.2% liked)

El Chisme

418 readers
574 users here now

Place for posting about the dumb shit public figures say.

Rules:

Rule 1: The subject of a post must be a public person.

Rule 2: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 3: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 4: No sectarianism.

Rule 5: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 6: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)

Rule 7: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 8: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.

founded 7 months ago
MODERATORS
 

When the one percent starts to feel paranoid, Clay Cockrell is the first to hear about it. A therapist who specializes in treating the neuroses of the ultrawealthy, Cockrell says that many of his clients are in the privileged position of getting freaked out by eat-the-rich sentiments these days. “The Birkin bags are going into hiding,” he says. “I’m seeing a lot of people increasing their security and privacy. They’re worried about being too showy, too flashy.” One client is driving a ten-year-old Toyota and leaving his Lamborghini in the garage; several others have put away their multi-carat diamond rings. They’re all posting less on social media.

the rest


A real-estate agent who sells luxury properties in the tristate area is seeing the same thing. “It’s a weird time to be rich right now,” she says. “All the wealthy people I know are keeping their cards closer to the chest.” Sure, maybe they’re a smidge unnerved by the economy’s flashing red warning signs, but they’re largely immune to such things. “When people have that much money, stuff like inflation doesn’t really affect them,” she says. What they do care about, though, is being judged for their conspicuous consumption. “When the whole world is crying poor and you’re living your life in this wealthy bubble, it’s really frowned upon,” she says. They’ve all seen The White Lotus. “No one wants to be like that.”

Obviously, the idea of the über-wealthy wringing their hands about looking too rich is maddening in itself. But many of them don’t know exactly where to turn. One multimillionaire I spoke to, who owns about $15 million in Florida real estate, told me that he’s taking extra precautions to be low-key. “We’re just kind of standing around with our hands in our pockets, not sure what to do,” he says. “We’re not taking any vacations this year. I’d like to, but my wife thinks it’s a better idea to just stay close to home and not spend a lot.” They’re not anxious about their expenses, he says. “It’s more that we don’t want to rub it in people’s faces or draw attention to ourselves.”

Some might even view this swing away from ostentation as an extension of the quiet-luxury trend, but there’s a distinction. These people aren’t going for an IYKYK, old-money aesthetic, which conveys status in its own “tasteful” way; they’re genuinely trying to downplay what they have. It’s not just quiet — it’s silent. In an era of rising economic tension and class rage, a rich person’s privacy has become the ultimate commodity. They don’t want to be seen at the Chanel store. If they go to St.-Tropez, they’ll keep their circle tight.

Cockrell started noticing an undercurrent of nervousness among his clients after the UnitedHealthcare CEO was shot this past December. “I heard a lot of, ‘We’re getting gunned down in the street now,’” he recalls. Then came the inauguration, that striking display of American oligarchy. “There’s been a mood shift since everyone saw that row of billionaires sitting with Trump,” he says. “In times past, wealthy people were considered aspirational figures. Now, it’s more like, ‘If you’re wealthy, you did something wrong. You cannot be a billionaire without being a criminal. The system is stacked against the rest of us.’ And that has gotten louder and louder, and my clients are hearing it, and it’s disturbing to them.”

Katherine Fox, a financial adviser who caters to people who have inherited money (and has inherited money herself), says that many of her clients hide their wealth because they’re worried about how it might be perceived. “A lot of younger inheritors have this huge amount of internalized guilt and fear that has no outlet because they can’t talk about these things with anyone,” she says. “Especially over the past couple of months, when they’re faced with the overwhelming scope of problems in the world, they feel like they should be doing a bigger part to make a difference. But then it’s like, Well, what does that even look like?”

Unlike most of her clients, Fox is public about her inheritance and posts frequently about it online. “I know it’s rage-bait,” she says. “I get a ton of comments like, ‘Eat the rich,’ or ‘Just give it all away.’ But I am careful to moderate the more controversial stuff I post with captions that recognize the privilege and nuance of the situation.” Most people don’t read those, but she’s made her peace with that. “If I was the type of person who was bothered by angry trolls, I could never put myself out there the way I do. But I’m confident enough in what I’m actually saying that I can live with it.”

Her honesty has also been great for her business. Fox used to work in wealth management at Wells Fargo, where she realized that clients with multigenerational wealth — like she also had — came with a unique set of needs, financially and psychologically, that weren’t being met by more traditional advisers. So she broke off and started her own firm, Sunnybranch Wealth, a few years ago. “My impetus was to use my personal and professional expertise to help these people and also to normalize the fact that their problems are real,” she says. “They may only affect the top one percent of the one percent, but they are still problems. It’s just that no one talks about them because it’s not socially acceptable.” Sure, she gets a lot of hateful messages online, but she also hears from fellow inheritors with no one else to talk to. “I’m just the one saying the quiet parts out loud,” she says.

If you’re wondering, she does encourage her clients to donate to charity. “But you can’t just give it all away tomorrow,” she says. “First of all, it’s not that simple. It’s logistically difficult. Then you’re still going to be dealing with the same guilt and uncertainty of, Did I make the right decision?”

Of course, there are plenty of rich people who don’t have any qualms about enjoying their money as visibly as possible, who have even made excess their personal brand. As Cockrell points out, those usually aren’t the types who reach out to him or lie awake at night fearing a Marxist revolution. “Great wealth can make empathy challenging, let’s put it that way,” he says. Studies even show that wealthier people tend to be less compassionate; researchers postulate that it’s because their money insulates them from needing to cultivate and rely on (and care about) their communities. Cockrell notes that many of his clients live cloistered lives, cut off from the economic realities of tariffs and inflation and a looming recession.

He’s also seen that popular sentiment toward the über-rich is cyclical. “The last time the backlash against the wealthy was this strong was probably at the beginning of the pandemic,” he says, alluding to the stark divide between the people who quarantined in their country estates with live-in staff and those who had to risk their lives to deliver takeout. Before that, the lowest moment was probably the Great Recession, when he was just starting his career as a therapist and had a few clients who worked on Wall Street. “Societal attitudes toward the wealthy ebb and flow,” he says. “There will be moments when people get more comfortable, take their diamond bracelet out of the safe and start wearing it again.”

The real danger of times like this, he says, is not that rich people will face actual harm from the ravaging masses. (“Or at least, it’s extremely unlikely,” he clarifies.) Rather, it’s that their fears of public judgment and animosity — no matter how much they might deserve it — drive them further into their sequestered, comfortable worlds, away from a sense of accountability or responsibility. “For a lot of my clients, there’s a degree of confusion. Like, ‘One day I’m looked up to, and the next day, I am vilified. But I haven’t done anything horrible, and nothing has changed. What do I do?’”

The answer, he believes, is encouraging them to understand why regular people might feel so angry about the concentration of wealth, and to get involved in their communities. “I try to get them to be curious and to connect with people outside their orbit. Don’t just write a check — hand out blankets, ladle soup, have an impact, and interact with people in a way that’s meaningful,” he says.

But for some, stepping out of their manicured lives is just too intimidating — or, in this climate, feels too risky. They’d prefer to hole up and retreat into their money instead. “They can lead incredibly isolated lives,” Cockrell says. “It’s not good for anyone.”

top 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

It's afraid!

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

France, early 1780s: "It's a weird time to be a noble right now."

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

seeing it… you simply love to

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 day ago

soypoint-1gui-bettersoypoint-2 WANNA MAKE THAT WEIRD FEELING STOP?

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 day ago

Let's make it even weirder for them.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 day ago (1 children)

‘If you’re wealthy, you did something wrong. You cannot be a billionaire without being a criminal. The system is stacked against the rest of us.’

Yes, congratulations. You understood it- oh, you're saying that in an exasperated way. You don't understand why people feel that way, just that they feel that way, and your response is confusion rather than a moment of self-reflection.

Well, hold that thought while putting on this blindfold please. Yes yes, stand against the wall, just like that.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 day ago

every great wealth hides a great crime, jot that down

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago
[–] [email protected] 25 points 2 days ago

“When the whole world is crying poor and you’re living your life in this wealthy bubble, it’s really frowned upon,” she says. They’ve all seen The White Lotus. “No one wants to be like that.”

There are only two reactions to that show: “This is a biting caricature of how contemptible the bourgeoisie are” or “OMG look how fabulous their vacations are I wish I was rich like that.”

[–] [email protected] 29 points 2 days ago

Unlike most of her clients, Fox is public about her inheritance and posts frequently about it online. “I know it’s rage-bait,” she says. “I get a ton of comments like, ‘Eat the rich,’ or ‘Just give it all away.’ But I am careful to moderate the more controversial stuff I post with captions that recognize the privilege and nuance of the situation.” Most people don’t read those, but she’s made her peace with that. “If I was the type of person who was bothered by angry trolls, I could never put myself out there the way I do. But I’m confident enough in what I’m actually saying that I can live with it.”

These cockroaches aren't nearly scared enough

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 days ago

I drink their tears like Gatorade, squeal you parasites, squeal lets-fucking-go

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

So they'd rather be wealthy while everyone else suffers while also believing that they are potentially risking their own death, rather than just...donating a lot of it, helping other humans move forward, and living modestly.

I wonder why that slogan became so popular.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

Clearly throwing dollar bills out into crowds on the street is too difficult. You can't just go around handing $100 bills to people you see, think of how icky those poors are! Some of them don't even wear jewelry!

[–] [email protected] 25 points 2 days ago (2 children)

One multimillionaire I spoke to, who owns about $15 million in Florida real estate, told me that he’s taking extra precautions to be low-key. “We’re just kind of standing around with our hands in our pockets, not sure what to do,” he says.

How about you pull that shit out of your pockets?? Not sure what to do? How about you do good? Good lord what massive diapers. You know who ain’t scared to be rich? Dolly Parton. Figure it out since, according to y'all, ur bank account correlates to ur intelligence.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago

Like if you have that much money, you could literally go around handing out keys to homeless people and just be like "Go stay at this house, rent free, and please be respectful to others living there/clean up after yourself."

I get there's liability and landlord/tennet laws, but other than that? Nothing is stopping you from letting people stay at your house(s). If you have $15 million, you have enough money to even hire staff to take care of all this shit for you. I worked in university housing where we had a staff of ~50 people (about 10 professionals on salary and 40ish student interns) that was responsible for a couple thousand people and we did it on less than $1.5 million per year for the whole department.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 2 days ago

Fucking A. I hate these types so much. "Well gosh it sure is awkward being rich around so much poverty and poverty-driven angst."

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 days ago
[–] [email protected] 34 points 2 days ago

Her honesty has also been great for her business. Fox used to work in wealth management at Wells Fargo, where she realized that clients with multigenerational wealth — like she also had — came with a unique set of needs, financially and psychologically, that weren’t being met by more traditional advisers. So she broke off and started her own firm, Sunnybranch Wealth, a few years ago. ...

"Its just a bunch of parasites sucking on parasites down there?" astronaut-2 astronaut-1

[–] [email protected] 23 points 2 days ago (2 children)

“A revolution is impossible without a revolutionary situation; furthermore, it is not every revolutionary situation that leads to revolution. What, generally speaking, are the symptoms of a revolutionary situation? We shall certainly not be mistaken if we indicate the following three major symptoms: (1) when it is impossible for the ruling classes to maintain their rule without any change; when there is a crisis, in one form or another, among the ‘upper classes’, a crisis in the policy of the ruling class, leading to a fissure through which the discontent and indignation of the oppressed classes burst forth. For a revolution to take place, it is usually insufficient for ‘the lower classes not to want’ to live in the old way; it is also necessary that ‘the upper classes should be unable’ to live in the old way; (2) when the suffering and want of the oppressed classes have grown more acute than usual; (3) when, as a consequence of the above causes, there is a considerable increase in the activity of the masses” [3]

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Damn, spring 2020 really was a revolutionary situation

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago

I would say 2020 was a clear demonstration of the US's approach towards revolutionary conditions that started to show in 2008. Look at the periods of unrest we've seen in the US since then: Occupy Wall Street, then BLM, then the George Floyd Rebellion. Each one more expansive, radical, and unconstrained than the last. The American people have been getting squeezed and have not been unaware, and in each instance of pressure rising they have responded in greater numbers, with greater militancy, and with greater organization.

Today that squeeze is tighter than ever and I think this summer will show more revolutionary potential than we've seen since the 60s or even the 30s. Maybe the real pop is a few years off, but this year will be a big step. The direction of history is clear as crystal - the only question is if the final ingredient for revolution will be there: a revolutionary vanguard party prepared to turn those revolutionary conditions into a proper revolution.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)

See, this is why I have this pet theory that an intra-class divide between the traditional capitalists and the professional-managerial class of capitalists will be a pre-cursor to socialist revolution in the West. There’s too much contradiction between the meritocracy, capitalism is about letting the cream rise to the top narrative and the reality of how late stage capitalism is functioning practically. As the contradictions heightened, those who’ve bought into the former will be at odds with the traditionalists.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

the intractable nature of capitalist competition and the declining rate of profit produce irresolvible contradictions that only socialist revolution can wash away, and for people on this site to think that is anything other than inevitable is idealist fantasism

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

There is also a possibility of "common ruin of the contending classes". nuke

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

All the more reason to dedicate your every waking moment to building the revolutionary party

[–] [email protected] 44 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 days ago

Perfect emoji usage. 10/10 no notes