this post was submitted on 27 May 2025
860 points (99.5% liked)

politics

23672 readers
2727 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

He huffed about how the question wasn't "appropriate" even though his bill would result in kids being asked that same question.

A Republican state rep from Michigan testifying about his anti-trans sports bill on Monday was left speechless after an out Democratic colleague began his questioning by asking, “Representative, can you tell me: are you trans?”

A long beat staring down out gay Democratic state Rep. Mike McFall followed, before state Rep. Jason Woolford (R) managed to reply, “Are you?”

“I’m actually going somewhere with this,” he said to lawmakers in the small chamber.

“Because I want to know, how does a 14-year-old girl prove whether or not she’s trans to a 50-year-old coach?”

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 26 points 3 days ago

It's a real shame he deflected, I would have loved to see this argument continue.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 3 days ago (1 children)

trans guys have bigger dicks than republican legislators, so this is a fair question

[–] [email protected] 22 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Last time I was at the gynecologist’s- “that’s unusually big - are you sure you aren’t intersex”?

Nurse told me my dong was big, hehe.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 days ago
[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 days ago (8 children)

I guess I'm out of the loop on this subject and honestly I don't know if the information I have is factual or not.

Do trans women generally have a physical advantage over women? Are there any rules for this kind of thing? Do they need to be transitioning or taking suppression drugs? This is a serious question.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

There is a recent last week tonight with Jon Oliver that explores this topic in a way that entertaining and powerful. Definitely worth a watch.

https://youtu.be/flSS1tjoxf0

Hopefully you have a genuine interest and aren't "just asking questions"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 days ago

The answer is more complicated than other comments would lead you to believe. Before I get into all that, please know it doesn’t matter. Especially, when it comes to 14 year old kids who are playing JV sports at school.

First, the problem with studies is that there are very few trans athletes to study. Some studies have only one or two subjects.

Studies show that there is both an advantage and a disadvantage depending on what sport we are talking about and how long the athlete has been on hormones. Weightlifting and other strength based sports do tend to give an edge to trans women. However, cardio sports such as swimming and running put trans women at a disadvantage because they now have smaller muscle mass for their larger frames.

To me, it doesn’t matter. The camaraderie and other things that kids get out of sports is more important than who wins and who loses.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

"Do trans women generally have a physical advantage over women?"

No. Trans women were able to complete in the Olympics beginning in 2004. No trans woman has won an Olympic medal in the woman's category.

There are many studies that compare cis men to cis women and based on that claim trans women have an advantage. Among the studies that actually compare trans women to cis women it is generally found that trans women have no overall advantage.

"Are there any rules for this kind of thing? Do they need to be transitioning or taking suppression drugs?"

The rules and requirements vary by league. At higher levels of competition its generally required to have hormone levels at cis female levels for a prolonged period. Often 6 months or longer. To clarify, getting to those levels roughly takes 2+ years of hormone replacement therapy(hrt). Hrt for trans women generally consist of an anti-androgen, estradiol, and progesterone.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

There are many studies that compare cis men to cis women and based on that claim trans women have an advantage.

They also selectively exclude all of the sports where women have distinct advantages, like cross-country. Cis men are statistically better at quick bursts of energy, like weightlifting or sprinting… But cis women are statistically better at endurance sports like cross country. Basically, cis men have an higher concentration of fast-twitch muscle fibers, which use a lot of energy but are more powerful. While women have more slow-twitch muscle, which allows them to last longer while exerting less energy or using less oxygen.

Sports were originally segregated by sex because men couldn’t stand the thought of losing endurance sports to women. It would be wholly undignified for a dainty woman to beat a bunch of big strong men, after all. They broke women off into a separate category, so they didn’t have to worry about it. And all of those endurance sports conveniently get left out of the conversation whenever discussing the advantages that conservatives claim trans women have.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

I want to believe you, but the record for marathon time for men is faster than the record for women and the record for long swim events (1500m freestyle) for men is faster than the women's record.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 54 points 3 days ago (3 children)

trans people on hormone replacement therapy stop receiving the effects of whatever hormone their body produces naturally. so trans women lose muscle mass, bone density, whatever, and have no benefit from having previously lived as a man.

additionally, im of the opinion that less than 1 percent of child athletes go on to play professional sports, so who gives a shit who is playing who

[–] [email protected] 19 points 3 days ago (10 children)

One could argue that having gone through puberty as a male people might have a bigger frame which could be advantageous in some cases (basketball, track) but in my mind, this is more an argument for puberty blockers than against athletics

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Human beings are sexually dimorphic, but most of the advantages or disadvantages are negligible or can be overcome with training, so it makes little difference. It makes even less difference in middle and high school aged children, since everyone is at (somewhat) different points developmentally anyway.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago

negligible or can be overcome with training

I agree on a highscool/grade school level, but not at any extreme competitive level. There's a reason most of the world records for athletics are held by men.

Testosterone doesn't make all men better than all women, but if you take two equally trained+talented people for most athletic events, the men outperform the women.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

So in college sports the performance gap is larger and should be considered or no? I also find this hard to believe even at a highschool level. While I was in highschool the advantages of testosterone were very obvious. If it were really the case that it makes little to no difference then shouldn't the argument be to remove gender from sports all together?

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Also sports were never fair to begin with, they are literally competitions of ableism

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Maybe but that doesn't mean we shouldn't attempt to make them as fair as possible.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I disagree, especially if it means auditing childrens genetalia to vindicate a chud.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I agree with what you're saying but I also don't think it has to come to that. I guess my point is that if we don't make some attempt to set a standard then we are allowing literally anything. I don't honestly care for sports being tied to school in the first place but are we saying that anyone can claim to be trans and join the other team at any time because we're all too afraid to talk about it or what? If that's the case then it seems like we should just do a way with gender in sports completely.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

Exactly, we're talking about two different things when comparing children's sports and Olympic sports and it's easy to conflate the two.

Olympic competition needs fair rules to ensure the best humanity can produce is rewarded. The rules are already there and they seem to be fair and supported by trans athletes. Politicians need to stay out.

In children's sports it's more important kids learn skills, fitness, cooperation, and find a sense of community. So unless there is a massive outlier, the rules should maximise inclusion over "fairness". Politicians also need to stay out.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Imma keep it a buck fifty, I don't give a chicken fried fuck about fairness in any sport. Let them juice, drug, dope whatever, if they can do it then just document the conditions under which they achieved their times,reps, whatever.

This whole thing is just a fools errand to give chuds a foothold to deny transcare and further trans erasure.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I think you're being a little dramatic. I understand if you personally don't care about the rules but I have to imagine no one is saying it should just be an absolute free for all. Again I don't understand why we link school and sports but we do and for that reason it means a lot to some and nothing to others. I'm completely down for a free for all in professional sports.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›