this post was submitted on 23 May 2025
750 points (96.6% liked)

Technology

70285 readers
3453 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 20 points 18 hours ago (4 children)

An extra 25% must be paid by consumers. Like every other tariff. New taxes be like that.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 73 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (4 children)

It's coming true.

And again "tariff must be paid by Apple" really shows that he still has no idea how they work.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 18 hours ago

What a fucking idiot

[–] [email protected] 27 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

iPhones not iPhone's... Who let this idiot be in charge of anybody? Did he even go to school?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

& Just that entire sentence is atrociously bad

[–] [email protected] 10 points 18 hours ago

Thank your for your attention to this matter!€

[–] [email protected] 8 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

LMFAO it's the entire fucking tweet!! Thank your for your... omg you are the president of the united states get grammarly or something...you sound even dumber than the people who voted for you...

[–] [email protected] 26 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

Good fuck apple they probably donated to trump

[–] [email protected] 9 points 17 hours ago

They did, or at least Tim Cook did.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 34 points 19 hours ago

This is what you get for bending down to the tyrant in inauguration day. You cant appease tyrants, you must fight them.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

Failed business man telling people how to run their businesses. I’ve got an idea about how to make American manufacturing cheaper universal healthcare.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 20 hours ago

Such smol govment

[–] [email protected] 17 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

It is paid by consumers, not Apple. Other phone companies will raise prices as well to increase their profits, since iPhone prices will set a new high price. When Apple prices goes up 25% other phone companies can increase their prices by 15% and still be competitive to apple.

Actually to make same profit due to lower phone sales Apple may have to raise price even higher than 25% or find other ways to get consumers to pay more. Die hard fans of Apple will buy, whatever the price.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 21 hours ago (9 children)

This is actually a real socialist or even communist policy. The State controlling the businesses.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

How in god's name is this promoting worker ownership of Apple's phone production processes?

[–] [email protected] -4 points 19 hours ago (8 children)

Last time I looked, the Soviet, Chinese and North Korean people didn't own shit.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 21 hours ago (3 children)

It is authoritarian. Communist system devolve to authoritarianism because it is a natural progression (easy to do). Socialists can, but a good democratic political structure makes it harder.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 21 hours ago

Don't tell all the tankies.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

It would take MINIMUM 10 years to even come close to like 60% manufactured in US. And that’s assuming the US upends the entire global tech industry by coming even kind of close to TSMC’s chip manufacturing tech.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Thank you for your attention to this matter.

Who does he think he's talking to?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 21 hours ago

His subordinates, who else?

[–] [email protected] 17 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (1 children)

Tim Apple could just buy him a fucking plane and be done with it. And that would open up some interesting opportunities, nahmean?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

It’s what I’d do if I were an ambitious, resource hoarding, ass pimple billionaire.

It’s obvious the way to Trump’s heart is to tell him he’s pretty and give him something .

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 47 points 22 hours ago (4 children)

Killing Biden's CHIPs act certainly didn't help that cause.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)

He will kill and reinstate it to sell it as his own doing.
Obviously guided by his counselers and consultants.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 21 hours ago

Oh, like NAFTA!

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 22 hours ago

Tarriffs are an articulable cost that can be direclt passed on to the consumer. Income taxes would be something more manageable and the company would need to figure out what to pay. But, Republicans increasing taxes on their donors? Ha!

[–] [email protected] 4 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Apple should just not sell them in the US then.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 21 hours ago

Profiteers foregoing the largest source of profit? Not likely.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 23 hours ago

Looks like Apple is balking at paying the required bribe.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›