this post was submitted on 23 May 2025
425 points (95.7% liked)

Greentext

6259 readers
1331 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 14 points 11 hours ago

Wokeness is what keeps them in the air, which is why they're falling out of it now

[–] [email protected] 24 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

This person's grasp of physics is like halfway there. Like one more module and they'd calm the fuck down.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 hours ago

"A little knowledge" has never been more dangerous.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 hours ago

‘flying for no reason’

‘ignoring gravity’

‘somehow joints don’t break’

Halfway might be overstating it

[–] [email protected] 20 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

I think large planes "look" like they can't work because their "relative speed" is really low


that is, their speed relative to their length. We're used to seeing birds cover tens of lengths per second, whereas a large airliner covers ~1ish per second at takeoff.

Or not, but this always seemed like a plausible explanation as to why planes look impossible. (Though given that hovering birds don't look funny, maybe this is a silly observation...).

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 hours ago

Though given that hovering birds don't look funny, maybe this is a silly observation...

Birds flying against the wind and staying in the same spot as a result do look kinda weird though. Especially if you are not aware/don't notice there is mstrong winds

[–] [email protected] 15 points 13 hours ago

That's a really thoughtful take, I'm glad you shared. I think it has merit. I think proximity is a factor too. The public rarely gets up close to a jet, but I can attest from personal experience they seem much faster when you're closer during takeoff and landing.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

My faith in humanity is so low that I 100% believe there are planes are not real truthers that's out there.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Well, I mean, those flat earth idiots clearly have never flown, so I wouldn't be surprised if their digging down attitude would include planes. They already think the moon landing is fake, don't they?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago

Actually that's something I don't understand, they think the moon is a sphere about 100 miles across about 1000 miles above the flat Earth. Why couldn't humans have flown that short distance?

[–] [email protected] 33 points 20 hours ago

i remember when i thought these jokes were funny. now i know tons of people actually think like this and it's depressing rather than funny.

[–] [email protected] 49 points 20 hours ago

Be human.

Have billions of tons of atmosphere directly above you

Don't explode

Make it make sense

[–] [email protected] 12 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

...fake and gay

Hey now. Let's not blame gay people for the common-sense-defying demon-wizard sorcery that engineers get up to when someone threatens to take away their calculators and caffeine.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 15 hours ago

G.I.N.A.S.F.S.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 21 hours ago

Bruh some of the earliest planes were literally called biplanes. The gay has been complicit in aviation demon magic since the very beginning.

[–] [email protected] 43 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

It's not pressure under the wings, it's fucking Bernoulli sucking on top of them.

(So, yes, sure, it is gay, but it's not fake.)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

But then how can they fly upside down?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 hours ago

Flaps. (As in, the hinged bits at the back edge of the wings, that essentially change the shape of the wing as required, not by flapping the wings; that'd be an ornithopter, as in Dune, not a plane.)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 13 hours ago

Because air doesn't give a fuck about gravity

[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 day ago (1 children)

When you nut, but Bernoulli keep sucking...

"goofy plane"

[–] [email protected] 8 points 15 hours ago

I'm 100% convinced this was never a battle of airframes and manufacturers and simply was down to: "No, sir/ma'am, I will not fly the derpy plane into combat. Can't do it. YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND THE REST OF THE PILOTS WILL LAUGH AT ME"

[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Next time you see a plane imaging two hooks in the middle of the wings, a crane lifting up the plane with these two hooks and shaking it.

This give you a good approximation of what the forces in the plane are, and once you picture that you might think that there is no way the plane can hold up in this situation. Yet it does.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago

It's more like putting the plane in a bowl of jello and then shaking the bowl.

load more comments
view more: next ›