this post was submitted on 22 May 2025
356 points (97.8% liked)

No Stupid Questions

41177 readers
1808 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 week ago

It encourages then to develop that grindset early.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

How is that 15k statistic calculated? Sounds questionable. Do you have a source? Does that include social spending like the dedication of parents time and personal expenses such as in South Korea? Is that government spending? Are fundraisers only a USA thing?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

Regardless of how exactly the stat is calculated, I am sure it is massively inflated by college football budgets

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 week ago (3 children)

PSA, whenever someone asks you to buy something for a fundraiser just donate instead. Especially if you don't want what they're selling. They'll get 100% of that instead of like... I honestly don't even know, but it can't be more than 25%.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If I don't want something, I give nothing. Most fundraisers are pure extortion, and I can't be bothered to check if something is legit or lining someone's pocket. "No" is a full sentence.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago
[–] [email protected] -2 points 2 weeks ago

It is socialism thinly disguised as capitalism.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The real issue is these funds aren’t evenly distributed per student, school districts are funded by property tax which leads to poorer neighborhoods getting considerably less funding.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago

Criminally underfunded, plus capitalism as a value.

[–] [email protected] 92 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (4 children)

One of the major factors to consider here is that public schools in the US are not equally funded by number of students. Instead, most of the funding is provided by state and local property taxes, meaning that richer areas where houses are worth a lot more, get much better funding for their schools. So while those rich areas' school funding is probably much higher than the global median, the poorer areas' school funding is likely much lower, in a very high cost of living country in general.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_school_funding_in_the_United_States#State_and_local_role_in_education_funding

The other factor to also consider is that public schools in the US have fairly extensive athletic programs, meaning that they spend a lot of the funds to build and maintain things like American Football ~~stadiums~~ fields, swimming pools, etc., as opposed to only funding actual academic education.

Edit, I've retracted the link about teacher vs coach salaries because it's about College sports, not primary and secondary schools. I still haven't found a good source for this info regarding those.

PS: Aside from fundraisers, it's fairly common to hear teachers telling stories of having to spend their own money to buy supplies for their classes.

PPS: It's also common to hear stories of poor families doing everything they can to move to richer areas just so their kids can benefit from the much better-funded schools. I've even heard of situations where they will register their kids with the address of a relative who lives in a better-funded area, for the same reason.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 22 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Comparing things like this between countries is not straightforward. For example, Australia spends $14.1k per student while New Zealand spends $8.6k. That's about 5.2% of GDP for both countries. From those numbers, would we conclude that Australia is overpaying, or New Zealand is underpaying, or that the two countries are comparable?

https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/education-spending-by-country

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Damn, Norway being only 4% of GDP is shocking, because they also pay their teachers well and have great education in general.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I think that goes to my point about simple comparisons being difficult. Norway has a high GDP relative to its size, so 4% might be more than enough for their situation. You also have to account for things like the labor cost of teachers, which varies by country.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

Also the sort of things the schools spend money on. I don't know from experience, but I think US schools pay for police officers to be at the school. That seems crazy to me, and expensive.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago

I don't know the answer to your question, but I buy whatever the kids are selling. And I make like an idiot that knows nothing about it, whatever it is. (separately, am idiot, but I play it up)

I figure, maybe I can help a little? The money is probably negligible towards whatever the need is, but learning to sling popcorn or cookies, that might stoke some spark of pint-size entrepreneurship in them :j

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Not the only reason, but the cost of living is higher in the U.S. than most other locales on the planet.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago

That was my first reaction. I didn't find the global average spending number reported by the OP, but according to this page, the 2019 average spending of $15,500 per student (38% higher than OECD average) did consider purchasing power.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

In my experience the outfits target schools to exploit the children's relationships and free labor with family. We are talking incredibly low quality junk you cannot find at stores or really even online.

At my school the goal was to sell like $1000 worth a crap to get a limo ride to a local restaurant.

6,7,8 year old etc do not have a value of wealth. "Oh daddy/mommy/grandpa, I really really want the limo ride" etc.

There's no legitimate reason for such a thing to exist other than pure exploitation. After experiencing that I would demand to opt out for my children.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

I absolutely agree, and having lived through it, it's infuriating the way they intentionally exclude/call out kids whose parents haven't signed them up or who haven't sold any trash. They'll send the kids home to sign up 10 email addresses and on the second day they'll come back with some piece of shit stuffed animal for everybody who did it. A little kid doesn't understand that the whole thing is a fucking scam. They're just sitting in school watching the rest of their class play with cool new toys.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 weeks ago

Looking at the global median isn't a good comparison, for starters. Many of those school systems aren't comparable.

That said, there's not likely to be one reason. I could guess at them, but I'd rather not since some will inevitably be wrong.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago

without digging into the numbers, i can pretty confidently say that schools are more than 30% more expensive than the global median in the US. staffing costs especially.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 2 weeks ago

Textbooks are a racket and not just for college students.

Most of the money spent on education involves grifts for stuff like that, not for actual important shit like schools or teachers.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 weeks ago

Have to teach kids to beg for the bare essentials early in life. That way they'll never know it could be different.

[–] [email protected] 117 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)
  1. These are often for extracurricular things like school trips.

  2. Schools are underfunded.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 week ago (2 children)
  1. The schools that aren't underfunded have millions of dollars in funds earmarked for sports usually.
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I think #1 is sports. Have you seen some of these stadiums?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Public primary and secondary schools do not typically have stadiums.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 36 points 2 weeks ago

Wrt 1, teachers buy out of pocket and request classroom supplies such as tissues, chalk, pencils, erasers, notebook paper, art supplies, graph paper, compasses, protractors, safety scissors, glue, , hand sanitizer, etc

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago

Cattywampus knows what's up

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

Not American, and I have no factual answer but I assume it's because the people at the top just take all the money and leave the schools to fend for themselves. Typical corporate nonsense.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 weeks ago

You'd think so, and while you're right that the people at the top make way too much money, docking their entire salary at a large district like mine would only be enough to fund maaaaaaaaaaaaybe just under 5% of the schools in our district. And then you'd be left without leadership. If you cut everyone in my pay scale, you'd have enough to fund all the schools and then some, but you wouldn't have teachers, custodians, tech workers, etc.

But here's something interesting: during the pandemic, since athletics funds were already allocated and athletic events were cancelled, we were allowed to use those funds as we saw fit within the district. Suddenly, we were able to feed every student and staff member for free. Yee haw, welcome to Texan education...

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›