this post was submitted on 21 May 2025
277 points (96.6% liked)

politics

23601 readers
2758 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 days ago

If gulf was a word to describe a type of person, he could be the gulf of America

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 days ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 days ago (8 children)

I don't know that we should be advocating for violence here. If we do that, we may find our opponents responding by doing the same, resulting in a positive feedback loop of escalation. I mean it's not like they [checks notes] carefully planned and organized a rally based on an extremely inflammatory lie, riled up the attendees, told them to fight, sent them to the Capitol Building resulting in an angry mob that stormed the Capitol while actively calling for the deaths of the VP and several members of Congress, killing some people and vandalizing the offices of Congress...oh, no. Well, at least they weren't pardoned for their flagrant, violent insurrection...oh, no. You know what? Just disregard my earlier comments. Carry on.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 155 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Matt Calkins, CEO of software company Appian… said Musk’s approach to running his tech companies didn’t translate well in Washington.

It doesn’t even work well in his tech companies.

[–] [email protected] 37 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Unrelated tangent on the Appian software: It is exactly your solution if you have a five person job, but need to employ 30

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 119 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (7 children)

Theater.

Elon Musk is playing the part of "heel", and articles and reporting like this is engineered to "take you in" to the moment, where something can be simplified and reduced to a "good" versus "evil" paradigm. It creates an escape clause for those doing the truly villainous where the heel can be pointed to as "worse".

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago

The old Vince McMahon strategy.

[–] [email protected] 51 points 2 days ago (3 children)

100%. Also a hatchet man. He's brought in, wrecks shit on purpose, gets "kicked out", profits immensely. Now admin can roll things back 5-10% to placate the plebes and blame Musk who everyone already hates for their life being worse. That said, a lot of people would nonperformatively tell him to go fuck himself. Just don't mistake it as anyone being on your side

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I was going to say, this has been one of the clumsier high-school dinner theater productions I've been to.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 days ago

Agree, and I've been to some pretty rough Rocky Horror Picture shows.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 27 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Lmao. He's so fucking unlikeable. That is absolutely hilarious.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 36 points 2 days ago (1 children)

He hurt a lot of people and the debt is higher than ever.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 days ago

Mission accomplished, for them

[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 days ago

Fuck all of them, I say

[–] [email protected] 72 points 2 days ago

Y'all are being way too nice on this actual Nazi

[–] [email protected] 82 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I concur, fuck you Elon Musk.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 days ago

I approve of this message

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 days ago

I'd rather deny him those bodily pleasures. Hit him with a bat instead.

[–] [email protected] 56 points 2 days ago (1 children)

But also fuck Scott Bessent. And pretty much everyone else within earshot of that conversation.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›