this post was submitted on 19 May 2025
232 points (97.2% liked)

politics

23557 readers
3309 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

President Donald Trump’s most ardent supporters are motivated by their prejudices, not economic concerns, social scientists contend. Will Democrats stop trying to win their votes?

In January, Smith and his University of Kansas colleague, associate sociology professor Eric A. Hanley, published a 47-page paper deconstructing the Republican president’s appeal. Building on decades of scholarship about the lure of authoritarianism and their own analysis of American voting psychology in 2012 and 2016, the social scientists make an argument that some may find offensive and others unsurprising.

It goes something like this: Trump’s biggest supporters are motivated by bigotry and want him to hurt the people they dislike.


Note: There's a lot to unpack in this article, and this just seems to be the hook.

(page 2) 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They're not all racists but all racists are maga

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

Unequivocally yes. Next question.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah, that’s about as surprising as sand at the beach.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

Around here its hard to find a sandy beach... I'd say as surprising as water in the ocean

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

I'm a Democratic Strategist and I think the BEST Takeaway from THIS is that we NEED to Start HURTING More People VERY LOUDLY so we can get THESE Votes INSTEAD of Trying to Keep the Voters we ALREADY have!

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago

Oh come on they can't be racist! There's people of color in that base! What are they, racist against themselves? Please, that makes no sense. That's like if there were Jews that supported the Nazis! Or black folk that fought for the Confederacy!

/s if that's not obvious

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago

Your just now deciding to weigh in on this? After how fucking long?

His base is fueled by a fear that the "wrong" people (people that look, speak,dress, act, believe differently, and that I don't really know) are trying to take the country from the "good" people (people like me, that I know).

The issue is that the only cure is to make people get outside of their box. I really started to realize this when I began working with more departments/clinicians in the hospital I was working at. What I've found is that the more you get out there and interact with people who aren't like you, the more you realize that broad generalizations aren't really worth a damn, and that there's more good people of all types than you'd think. The main thing they have in common is that they aren't fucking shitwad billionaires.

I used to show up early for work to catch the morning rush of doctors in the physicians lounge and see a Muslim doctor or two praying after being there since 2am because they were on call, and decided to round on all their consults before they left, and here I am rolling in hungover just waiting to pound out another 8 hours so I can go home and get drunk and high for another night.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 day ago
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

You need academics, research scientists and a bunch of professionals to figure this out?

This like asking firefighters to produce a research paper to determine if there is a fire for the towering burning 50 story inferno that's lighting up the skyline.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago

Suck it, Betteridge !

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I could have saved them some time, yes, yes they are. Now who do I call to get my name on this paper?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago
[–] [email protected] 58 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Honestly, my experience is entirely anecdotal, and I completely admit that. I have not read this article yet, so I don't even know what the conclusion is (but I can make an assumption).

Disclaimer being what it is, literally all of the full-on racist people I know or have known are also MAGA conservatives. And conversely, all the MAGA people I know or have known are way more racist than average. I say that from the perspective that, at least in the USA, most people have racial biases to a certain extent.

I've been told things like "You don't have the right skin color to take the bus into the city", meaning because I'm Caucasian with "white" skin, I would somehow be an outlier among the rest of the folks taking the bus. Many, many times I've heard statements like "we can't even say [the N-word] anymore even though that's what they call themselves all the time" and let me tell you the people saying that don't say "N-word" they say the real deal that rhymes with chigger. They'll claim illegal "Mexicans" took their jobs, without a moment's thought about who hired those "Mexicans" or what nationality those "Mexicans" are. There's really no skin color other than white-white that doesn't receive some hate.

Anyway, this is just old man ranting at this point, and it may even be too long to be readable, so let me summarize it with FUCK RACISTS & FUCK MAGA.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The average immigrant from Guatemala has had about 2-4 years of school in their entire life. They don't speak English and will never be fluent. There a decent chance they're not even literate in Spanish.

Now imagine who you have to be for that person to be a threat to your job.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

Democrats will absolutely still try to appeal to them. This is obvious by the fact that so many of them blamed being "woke" for why they lost. If it keeps them relevant, they will throw every minority under the bus.

[–] [email protected] 101 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Not necessarily, some of them could be not racist but too dumb to see the conflict.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If you read/hear anything people in Trump's orbit are pushing as policy and ignore the vehemently racist overtones, that doesn't make you any LESS racist for supporting obvious racists. That's like the trope of people saying "Well, I'm not racist, BUT........"

Same difference.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago (7 children)

Not saying there aren't a lot of racists, but there are also many very dumb people. I've met enough of the general population to feel fairly certain that there are a non-zero number of Trump supporters who are otherwise tolerant people. They simply don't think about it.

You'd be surprised by the proportion of the population which spends virtually no time on self-reflection. They just kinda bumble forward through life. Most of these people inherit their political affiliation like a sports team, from their environment. They're not bad people, they just don't think too hard.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 day ago

So... MAGA = Cucks? Once again, every accusation is a confession.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›