"Centrist" pundits be like: "No, it's the democrats, who went too far by language policing whites for calling blacks a historically accepted word blacks use in rap music, and other double standards, especially within law enforcement, favoring blacks over other races."
this post was submitted on 19 May 2025
232 points (97.2% liked)
politics
23557 readers
3309 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
HOLY FUCK! PEOPLE WHO VOTE FOR ETHNIC CLEANSING ARE RACIST!
Sigh... They're not racist they're just "economically anxious".
Me, a social scientist as well: Bubbler noises
The entire problem is very specifically that they lie about the economy in lockstep, and the media reports it and then idiot centrists are like "oh yeah I guess the economy is bad? People keep talking about it so it must be true."
They should never have been trying to court his "most ardent" supporters to begin with. It's the swing voters and non voters they need. (And the centrist agenda isn't the way to do it.)
The Trump supporters I know definitely are
"are we the baddies?"
It goes something like this: Trump’s biggest supporters are motivated by bigotry and want him to hurt the people they dislike.
Hence his supporter whining that he's not hurting the people he "needs" to be hurting. I'm sure many of us personally know people just like this and most definitely do get a chubby when they think about someone like donvict actively harming certain segments of society.
Wasn't this settled way back when?
Anyway, I seem to remember that digging deeper on donvict's base after Hillary's deplorables "gaffe" (not a fucking "gaffe" to tell the goddamn truth about awful people) found that she was basically correct - a portion of them are racists, xenophobes, homophobes, misogynists...
Took them long to find out the obvious answer. Nice they finally did.
Short answer: Yes.
Long answer: YEEEEESSSSSSSSSS.
Does the Pope shit in the woods?
Is the bear Catholic?
I hear the new pope likes camping, so likely, yes.
Their findings will be published in the "Journal Of No Shit Sherlock."
Is a circle round?
No. Like the earth, a circle is flat.
mic drop
Hmmm, I wonder if the political base that waves Confederate and nazi flags, serves a fascist dictatorship, and works alongside fascists globally might be racist? What a real head scratcher that is, who knows really
/s
I'm sure many don't think they're racist but most if not all probably buy into the line that we all have an equal playing field in life and any statement to the contrary is just victimhood.
Nobody wakes up in the morning, gets out bed, and enters the world with the intent to be an asshole. Yet there are a ton of assholes in the world.
Everyone does shitty things from time to time. The difference between an asshole and a good person is that the good person realizes when they've been shitty and tries to learn something from the experience.
The ones I talk to, now, openly admit that Muslims are "scary", gays are "disgusting", and women are "lesser".
The same bunch usually think going to university somehow "taints" someone.
Of course they either overlook or don't know that plenty of the people they vote for went to college, too.
Talking to my aunt Linda, eh?
What scares me more isnt the men who think women are lesser. What scares me are the women who think women are lesser, and want men who think that too
Women who are like that usually change their mind after a couple of years buckled into the yoke. There's currently a whole group of women stuck in golden handcuffs in the trad wife influencer community who are miserable in their relationships but making too much ad money to consider stopping.
It's not always necessary to believe in white supremacy to support white supremacist policy. It would be sufficient to just be a psychopath who is white.
If you have no empathy, no capacity for compassion, give zero shits about justice or the greater good of society, and you believe that putting racists in power will help people of your own race, that's what you're going to do. Because it might help you, personally, to get ahead.
I think there are more of these people in the Republican party than there are those who actually think the white race is superior and deserves to rule.
Begin?
"Journalist remembers social sciences exist and start listening 10+ years late to see if it snags some web traffic" Trust me, social science and history have been on red alert this whole time.
How many racists do you know that didn’t vote for Trump?
Same reason bigotry isn't an impedance to a gay or woman President that I see so many people try to claim. Bigots aren't voting Democrat no matter who it is. Good thing you don't need those deplorables to win.
…yes
I mean, obviously the answer is yes. But that is a great hook into what's next.
This article also does a good job of making an argument for the Democrats to tack left and have a strong contrasting message to the Republicans. Even the squishiest, least offensive MAGA is still pretty far right and closer to Trump than to any Democrat. They don't even regret their votes in any appreciable way. The most regret is coming from people who stayed home or voted third party. Give them a real contrast so even the most intellectually dishonest grifter can't say "both sides" anymore.
If the Democrats had a real message and some fight in them, they could be an opposition party. Instead, most just want to write strongly worded letters without doing the hard work. And with that, they might actually win elections. Too bad they're only starting to figure this out now when it's probably too late.
Is a frog’s ass watertight?
Most asses are
view more: next ›