this post was submitted on 15 Mar 2024
131 points (94.0% liked)

politics

19107 readers
3052 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Judge Scott McAfee's ruling into whether to disqualify Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis in the case into former President Donald Trump's alleged election interference sparked outrage from MAGA members on Friday.

McAfee ruled that Willis could choose between staying on the case herself or keeping attorney Nathan Wade as a prosecutor. Attorneys representing Trump's co-defendants argued the relationship between Willis and Wade should lead to her disqualification, alleging the pair benefited from taxpayer dollars. Willis, however, maintained that she engaged in no wrongdoing and that their relationship began only after he was hired.

Conservative commentator Benny Johnson said during a livestream discussing the ruling that it was "not the result we were looking for."

"We were looking for total and complete disqualification," he said.

Conservative pundit Tim Pool wrote in a post to X, formerly Twitter, "This judge is a coward."

top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago

Well usually that's a good thing...when fascist morons are upset then democracy is working.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago

Outrage is their whole identity.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago
[–] [email protected] 15 points 8 months ago

Good, fuckem. Worthless traitor garbage.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 8 months ago

Dim Tool followed his tweet up with another which read “…civil war?” /s

[–] [email protected] 12 points 8 months ago

Good to see it has.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 8 months ago

I wish I could afford to hire a lawyer to question the morals of any cop who ever writes me a traffic ticket. Take it to the Supreme Court!

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago

Article title tells low intelligence maga folk what to think and feel. Stay tuned for more outrage

[–] [email protected] 11 points 8 months ago (1 children)

When you are guilty AF and can't defend against a mountain of solid evidence, all you got is trying to get the case crushed on some technicality.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago

It would be some proper justice for the Justice Dept to step in and say "We agree, Willis has shown a conflict of interest, and as a result, Jack Smith will now be the prosecutor."

Try to get it thrown on a technicality, get an even harsher prosecutor

[–] [email protected] 57 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Everything enrages these fucking snowflakes. They can go suck an egg.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

They have to act outraged or the legitimate outrage of democrats and progressives will make them look even worse. It's vital they maintain every aspect of their alternate reality or it all crumbles.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 8 months ago

Fani Willis allowed this to become an issue.

This was an unforced error on her part and never had to come into question in the first place.

[–] [email protected] 111 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I wish they were just as outraged about Clarence Thomas and his wife.

[–] [email protected] 70 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Or Trump and his entire family.

[–] [email protected] 56 points 8 months ago

Or that a trump backed company paid Smirnov, the lying FBI informant and central to the entire impeachment effort to smear the Bidens, $600,000 right before he started lying about what he knew.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Judge Scott McAfee's ruling into whether to disqualify Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis in the case into former President Donald Trump's alleged election interference sparked outrage from MAGA members on Friday.

Attorneys representing Trump's co-defendants argued the relationship between Willis and Wade should lead to her disqualification, alleging the pair benefited from taxpayer dollars.

Willis charged Trump and 18 others for efforts to allegedly overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election in Georgia, which the former president has claimed was stolen despite a lack of evidence.

"This finding is by no means an indication that the Court condones this tremendous lapse in judgement or the unprofessional manner of the District Attorney's testimony during the evidentiary hearing," Judge McAfee wrote.

Fani Willis overpaid her lover Nathan Wade as he had zero experience with RICO cases, abuse of taxpayer funds!"

Willis has not yet responded to McAfee's ruling, but legal experts have said the judge gave her an "easy choice," as she can simply remove Wade from the case and continue toward the trial, which has already been delayed due to the disqualification question.


The original article contains 682 words, the summary contains 184 words. Saved 73%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!