this post was submitted on 09 May 2025
684 points (99.6% liked)

politics

23705 readers
2738 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The Trump administration’s tariff scheme appears less and less likely to bring manufacturing jobs back to U.S. shores.

Businesses across the country are crunching the numbers and realizing that, despite Donald Trump’s insistence, they can’t balance out his tariff hikes across the supply chain.

“Some manufacturers who had plans to open factories in the country say the new duties are only adding to the significant obstacles they already faced,” Bloomberg reported Friday.

That’s because the supply chain to produce those goods in the United States simply isn’t there, requiring companies to import raw materials and factory equipment—which Trump’s tariffs have made unaffordable—from abroad.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 21 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

So first Trump prevents any ex-allies to the US from trading with them

Then Trump prevents factories from being opened in the US to produce goods locally

What kind of 6D backgammon is this?

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 weeks ago

The kind where shelves go empty soon. I remember walking round the grocery store during covid and everything being empty, felt like a dream. Now it's a nightmare.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 weeks ago

It was never possible even under normal circumstances

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 weeks ago

back to the mines!

[–] [email protected] 28 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

That's the point. Destroy America but keep idiots voting for it.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Well they want to almost destroy America, that way the rich can buy up everything for cheap and become even more pwoerful. They're literally trying to recreate the situation that caused the rise of oligarchs in Russia.

And the idiots vote for it because they've been brainwashed by propaganda to think they'll be part of the elite once it's over.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

This is what I’ve been saying, building factories is already an expensive and time consuming process, then you slap high prices on everything you need to make a factory work it’s going to be out of reach for basically anyone and the few who can afford it likely wouldn’t anyway because like this describes it’s not fiscally responsible but also the US is in decline why would you be putting an enormous investment into a wildly unstable system? If you want manufacturing in the US building factories needs to be reasonable price wise and you need consumers with the funds to do the consuming, neither of which can be delivered now

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago

Also need regulatory approval, plus funding talent and all the employees for said factories, and then manage the logistics from the factories to distribution warehouses then to the stores.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

What Trump and MAGA wanted can be done... but over a period of many years (like 20+ years) of careful and purposeful policy making.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

ironically, much of the domestic industrial policy Biden signed into law was intended to do exactly this but Trump reversed course because corrupt reasons

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

"Corrupt reasons" is actually giving him too much credit. He's tearing up everything Biden did because Biden did it. He did the same thing with as much of Obama's legislative agenda as he could.

It's pure pettiness. He can't allow his predecessors to have a legacy. His ego cannot afford it.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

So how come the people in MANUFACTURING couldn't see his proposal in MANUFACTURING was a big crock of shit?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago

Because the people writing him checks aren't the people doing all the actual work.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

you were warned months before, and even before the election. dont act surprised, you thought his only legislation was tax cuts, but it wasnt , he was pushing things further along the line for PUTIN.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 weeks ago

Only the 1% are getting tax cuts. This was all known before the election but people are dumb.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

The world has no appetite for his big beautiful luxury goods store.

USA used to be the managers and leaders of these factories, now he wants them to be the grunt workers and for some reason people are all for it.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 weeks ago (7 children)

Before Reaganomics and globalism the middle class was strong and built on the shoulders of blue collars, why do you think they forced globalism down our throat? So they could make stuff cheaply and could eradicate the middle class. I hate Trump and what he stands for, but globalism was something the left was fighting against back in the day because the left realized the consequences of losing manufacturing jobs in first world countries.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

What made those jobs great for the middle class wasn't the fact that they were blue collar manufacturing jobs, it was the fact that they were unionized.

Unions and high top tax brackets built the American middle middle class between the fourties and the eighties. Yes, offshoring allows companies to seek lower wages elsewhere, but the solution to that is not sweatshops at home. You need to start by building up strong labour rights and investing in education and infrastructure, which drive investment in job growth. Stop trying to regain all the jobs you lost and work and improving the jobs you have.

Yes, leftists have been warning about globalisation for decades, and they're right, but lets not pretend that what Trump is doing is even in the same continent as a solution.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

It's still good jobs for people who won't go to university, you can't tell these folks "just learn programming" when what they're good at is manual work.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

All socialist ideologies are globalist.

"Workers of the world unite" ring any bells? "All war is class war?" Globalist rhetoric. The idea that artificial divisions like nations are weapons against the people.

You are, ironically, using the word the way Reagan and his kind used it, as an ill-defined nationalist slur to protect local profit margins.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

There's a difference between fighting together against capitalism and being pro economic globalization. Economic globalization has actually hurt the workers of the world and you know full well that's what I'm talking about, you just want to argue for the sake of arguing.

https://repository.law.miami.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1082&context=umiclr

[–] [email protected] -1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Because only white Europeans deserve to have the benefits of an industrial or post industrial economy, obviously.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

Go tell a kid making Nike shoes that he's benefiting

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 weeks ago

they also saw reagan was a easy to manipulate stooge, especially after his alzheimers starting to affect him, they took even greater advantage of him.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

the supply chain to produce those goods in the United States simply isn’t there

This is what everyone has been saying ad-nauseum since this whole shit show started.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 weeks ago

BRB, setting up my backyard forge after years of not smooshing any metal. Looks like it's up to people like me to make all this complicated tool&die

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago

But they'll be able to build big beautiful factories with huge tarriffs on all the building supplies and equipment right?

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›