this post was submitted on 09 May 2025
992 points (98.4% liked)

Microblog Memes

7897 readers
3602 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 3) 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 98 points 3 weeks ago (12 children)

I'm surprised so many people still don't realize that HR exists to protect the company, not the employee. Yes, since a bad or reckless manager can put the company at significant risk, sometimes they will take the side of the employee, but not because it's their charter.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 weeks ago

Exactly. They're not there for you.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 weeks ago

Humans are the resource.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

The fact that it's called human resources instead of something less dystopian should be a hint. If you want an actual ally as an employee you gotta unionize.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] [email protected] 45 points 3 weeks ago (11 children)

one time i had to interrupt an hr sensitivity seminar because the trainer casually threw down an ethnic slur for me

[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 weeks ago

What the fuck?

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] [email protected] 67 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

A coworker drunkenly made out with my face at a work event and HR tried to send me to a sexually harassment seminar so I could "learn what sexually assault really is"

Another great quote from that meeting: "if you knew she was a sloppy drunk, why were you hanging out with her?"

HR is there to protect the company - not you

[–] [email protected] 29 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 28 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

It was crazy. What made it worse was that I didn't even report it...my friend was so upset about it, he told his boss.

When the HR director asked me what I wanted to happen to the girl, I told her NOTHING. I don't want her fired or anything, I don't even work directly with her. Then she asked why, if I didn't want anything to happen, I reported it? BITCH I DIDN'T I was going to find a new job and move the fuck on with my life

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

That last line is the key take-away for dealing with ANY HR.

Never forget who signs their paychecks.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

"Tina, there are six of us. Learn to share"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 111 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

"If you're going to start a meeting with fat shaming me, then yes; I am going to fire back. Don't dish it out if you can't take it yourself.

If you have a problem with that, we can get the lawyers involved and discuss it further."

But I also live somewhere that actually has labour laws and where 'at-will' employment is a ridiculous concept. If you want to fire someone (after their three months probation), you've gotta have a good reason and you better document it throughly.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

"At will" isn't as magical as people think.

If you terminate an employee without documented cause, you still have to pay them unemployment.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

they can just say they're downsizing, or the employee hasn't been performing well, or any other lie. as long as they don't specifically mention that you're being terminated for something illegal you'll never stand a chance in court.

that being said. record every meeting with hr, they slip up more than you think

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

That's simply not true.

If you're laid off they have to pay unemployment. If you aren't performing well they have to show records proving it when you file unemployment and they try to deny the claim.

Please don't talk about topics on which you're clearly uninformed, because the belief that someon3 can be fired for anything with no recourse keeps people from filing for unemployment when they're 100% eligible.

All "at will" means is that they can fire you for any reason or no reason. They may still be required to pay unemployment, but they don't have to keep you on staff.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I'm in PA, so yeah unfortunately this is how it goes. hats off to y'all in states with slightly better laws, but this is how it goes in my state. I speak from personal experience as well as the experience of my friends.

and all that documentation can be easily fabricated or cherry picked to try to make a point that isn't there.

it doesn't matter how the system is supposed to work, the laws in this country and PA especially are so fucked that it very rarely works out in the employees favor. you can potentially get unemployment, but wrongful termination suits very rarely go anywhere.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

No, that's not how it works in PA or any state.

You're incorrect regarding unemployment eligibility as it relates to at-will employment status, and since you don't know what you're talking about you need to shut the fuck up before you discourage people from even attempting to pursue their rights when they lose their job.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 62 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

In practice this just means that your documented cause will be fabricated.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

It doesn't really need to be fabricated. It's stupid easy to build a case to legitimately fire anyone.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 40 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I used to feel bad for Toby that Michael was constantly shitting on him. That is, until I encountered corporate HR. And now I too hate so much about the things that Toby chooses to be.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 3 weeks ago

True lore: in one episode, Toby says that he was actually training to be a priest, but he gave it up to hook up with a woman. (who later left him and is now his ex.) Then he just took the first job that he saw. ...almost as if he was guided to it by a higher power?

So canonically Toby is in a living hell because he rejected his god to indulge his fornicatory lust.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Why are you the way you are?

[–] [email protected] 25 points 3 weeks ago

Toby's from HR, which means he's not a part of our family. Also he's divorced so he's not really a part of his family either.

[–] [email protected] 163 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (4 children)

Who would have imagined that a department called "human resources" wouldn't have your best interests in mind?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Most functional HR departments actually do have the workers best interests at heart, because protecting the company and not screwing over workers usually has a ton of overlap. But HR does a lot more than handle workplace disputes.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 21 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Where I'm working they rebranded HR to ✨"People & Culture"✨ so I don't know what you mean. With that name, they simply must have our best interests in mind instead of always siding with the higher ranking individual.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Weird, at my company they changed it to "flesh asset repair and removal."

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago

This was a triumph! I'm making a note here, "Huge success!"

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 weeks ago

Found the meatbag Amazon warehouse employee

[–] [email protected] 38 points 3 weeks ago (6 children)

If you think about the phrasing of the title “Human Resources”, it makes sense that they are not your friends.

Let’s look at the definition of the word resource:

resource /rē′sôrs″, -zôrs″, rĭ-sôrs′, -zôrs′/

noun

  1. Something that is available for use or that can be used for support or help. “The local library is a valuable resource.”
  2. An available supply, especially of money, that can be drawn on when needed.

Those definitions describe disposable commodities; easily replaceable. The adjective “human” simply refines what type of disposable and replaceable commodities that the department deals with.

If you want someone to be your advocate your best interests at a job, you’ll need to hire a lawyer. In the meantime, make sure you take notes, and follow everything up with an email (bcc your personal email a copy of each correspondence).

If your state allows one-party consent, you can even record conversations; be very aware that despite being legal, it will likely get you fired with prejudice if anybody finds out you’ve been recording them without their knowledge.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 weeks ago

That's why forward-looking and thoughtful tech companies call them "People ops," which changes absolutely nothing about what they do.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

It could also be interpreted as "resources for humans", but you're spot on

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›