this post was submitted on 09 May 2025
1343 points (98.8% liked)

Microblog Memes

7657 readers
2600 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

I wonder why BioWare was pressured to cut out so much of Juhani’s content in KOTOR. I don’t think that was a BioWare decision - Jade Empire and Mass Effect both had lesbians. I’m not really willing to give George Lucas rainbow a lot of rainbow points.

If Finn and Poe’s chemistry had been allowed to blossom naturally, I think the sequels would have been much better. The attempted “theme” of “it doesn’t matter where you come from, you can shape your own destiny” just would be so much better if the story had been about Finn’s growth and reconciliation with his past work for the First Order. Then you don’t have Rose (and the subsequent ridiculous internet harassment that poor actress received) and the aborted character/subplot.

You can even do Palpatine returning, just have it be more like the Thrawn clone shit. Less Jedi stuff, more people stuff. You’re even copying the structure of the original trilogy that way - Rey is off doing her Jedi training stuff, while Poe and Finn are on related adventures that lead them to growing closer and closer.

Like I’m 99% sure the actors for both characters have even said that they agreed with the fact that those characters were needing each other.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 54 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (6 children)

he followed up to simultaneously say he was joking while also doubling down 🤦

screenshot of follow-up tweet linked below

https://xcancel.com/theronster/status/1538239717032042497

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Wars are political in nature, it doesn’t even need to get to this shallow of a depth

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 week ago (2 children)

"War is a mere continuation of politics by other means" -Carl von Clausewitz

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 53 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Really there's nothing that's not political in some way. Politics is the expression of human wills and desires and people tend to say something is political when they disagree.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 week ago

Woah there, that's leftist woke propaganda, talking about human wills and desires. I was brought up apolitical so I'm sensitive to these things - I can only vote for the Republicans because every other party is just too political.

/s

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 week ago

Literally. Politics is all about the power dynamics between people. If there are two or more people there will always be a power dynamic even if the two are on good terms and do not exert power over each other.

It’s like how you can always describe the color in any given painting, even when the painting is monochromatic.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 63 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Political: the act of making people feel bad about their dumb choices and opinions

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 week ago

Woke: whatever a right winger doesn't like

[–] [email protected] 62 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Every so often I wonder how people could be so stupid and/or heartless to bring the world to where it is today and then I see an American tweet something outstandingly silly/inmoral and I remember, lol.

Also, Americans use the word "political" to mean ethical nowadays. And whenever they recoil because you said something like "hey, wars for profit are wrong" or "gay people shouldn't be killed just because they're gay" and ask you to stop being 'political', they're just admitting they don't stand for anything, no self-restraining rules nor lofty ideals. This is why the Nazis could also go as far as they went: "just follow the leader and I too will succeed, I don't believe or stand for anything except what has been told to me and I'm a good boy for following". They want/got the bag, and fuck you, basically.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 week ago

Every so often I wonder how people could be so stupid

Most of the world's large predators are extinct or on the verge of extinction. Interpret that how you want.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Also, Americans use the word "political" to mean ethical nowadays.

A certain segment of our population has been told to equate words like "political" and "woke" with "That person is saying or doing something that might influence someone about something I've been told to disagree with".

It's incredibly horrifying how quickly this same segment of the population has been conditioned to view the rest as "weak, sensitive, entitled weirdos who can't handle even the slightest criticism without seeing it as a existential threat" while simultaneously being conditioned to throw a tantrum when anyone takes an action to support something they've been told they should disagree with.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Americans use the word "political" to mean ethical nowadays.

This is wonderfully succinct and I will be stealing it, please and thank you.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 week ago
[–] [email protected] 38 points 1 week ago

I prefer the 18th century Carl Von Clausewitz's definition of war:

War Is politics by other means

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carl_von_Clausewitz

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›