this post was submitted on 08 May 2025
664 points (98.3% liked)

Games

38427 readers
2129 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here and here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

With the implementation of Patch v0.5.5 this week, we must make yet another compromise. From this patch onward, gliding will be performed using a glider rather than with Pals. Pals in the player’s team will still provide passive buffs to gliding, but players will now need to have a glider in their inventory in order to glide.

How lame. Japan needs to fix its patent laws, it's ridiculous Nintendo owns the simple concept of using an animal to fly.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 hours ago

I wonder how hard it would be for an "unofficial" patch to "somehow" be released that restores the previous functionality

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 hours ago

Fuck Nintendo.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 2 hours ago

This is bullshit. Warner Brothers and Nintendo need to lose, hard.

Also, why the hell does Nintendo think they were first when it comes to the concept? Animals and gliding have been a thing for a long time.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 3 hours ago

Remember they amended the patent after palworld came out

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

That's lame af. Flying on my dragon dude between my bases was badass.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 hour ago

You can still fly, it's just gliding that got hit by the gaming mafia

[–] [email protected] 35 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 56 minutes ago) (1 children)

Palworld did more for the monster-collecting genre in one early access title than Pokémon has in the last decade of AAA titles.

Why does Nintendo deserve these patents when they aren't going to produce anything meaningful with them and simply weaponize them to squash any real threatening competition?

Pokémon is the highest grossing franchise in the world, and 2nd place isn't even close. I think they can give a little ground to an indie developer who makes games that people are actually interested in playing. The patent bullshit is ridiculous.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 hours ago

Because that's how Nintendo works. They are the Disney of gaming.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 4 hours ago

I don't care about Palworld, but I do hate Nintendo. Enemy of my enemy and all that.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 hours ago

Not how patents work but whatever, Nintendo has more money so they’re in the right

[–] [email protected] 28 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

Nintendo are rightly losing their free pass with gamers.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 55 minutes ago

Heard that before, this happens every decade or so

[–] [email protected] 16 points 4 hours ago

That is very true, but the Venn Diagram overlap between Gamers^TM^ and ‘Nintendo gamers’ is a rapidly shrinking area.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 hours ago

So can we please fork v0.5.4?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 hours ago (3 children)

I wonder how much of this game they can force them to change. I know Steam has a 2 hour limit for returns but at what point does this game become “not the game I bought”?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 hours ago

Pretty much anything so long as Palworld doesn't have 1.- a backbone and 2.- a dictionary at hand. Because it is as simple as finding a picture of any of a long list of animals that can glide, state the words "previous art" and they should be free from this ridiculous demand.

Mechanics that already exist in nature should not be copyrightable. Can you imagine if the first videogame company ever patented "character walking"?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 hours ago

point does this game become “not the game I bought”?

Anytime you can’t access the version of a game you spent money on

[–] [email protected] 28 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

I mean, the game is in early access so if you bought it and are now complaining it changed... It's a you problem, not something that should be refundable.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

Nah, not complaining, idly wondering. I made my bed, I’ll sleep in it, I’m just wondering how far a game can go to change a game and still claim it’s the same game.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

There’s and endless list of games people have complained about changing during early access. It’s a stupid idea. Don’t preorder games.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 21 minutes ago

Yuuup, Palworld was a rare early access buy for me. Burned too many times but a sale burnt a hole in my pocket after holding off for years and I got curious, I knew what I was getting into haha

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 hours ago

Theseus' Game

load more comments
view more: next ›