this post was submitted on 07 May 2025
242 points (85.0% liked)

Blahaj Lemmy Meta

2593 readers
54 users here now

Blåhaj Lemmy is a Lemmy instance attached to blahaj.zone. This is a group for questions or discussions relevant to either instance.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

As posted about recently in [email protected] and [email protected] it seems that @[email protected]'s stance on transphobia has not changed and his apology only seems to be that he was sorry he got caught and that someone leaked the DM. This is concerning for an admin of Lemmy.ml and the leader of the project. I don't think this means we should stop using Lemmy, it's open-source and even if they embed donation links, they can be stripped out in our fork. But it does make me wonder if we should consider defederating lemmy.ml on that merit. Since if they hold such views on trans issues, it's very likely they won't have any desire to act on that type of transphobia being expressed on their instance.

I know that Lemmy.ml has and does handle overt transphobia well, but I can't speak to their ability to handle less overt or thinly veiled transphobia, and this incident doesn't inspire much confidence either.

Edit: Since some people haven't seen the original. I decided to include it here. Warning, it contains transphobia, if you don't want to see that, don't open the spoiler.

CW: Transphobic talking points

I'd really like to hear Feedback from Blahaj's local community on this, I'm not as interested in outside opinions here so please try to refrain from top-level commenting if you aren't from lemmy.blahaj.zone (I will ignore them if you comment anyway from a remote instance).

(page 3) 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 days ago (6 children)

I'd really hate to lose [email protected] honestly, it's the largest community for Linux stuff, and a big part of what I spend my time on Lemmy doing. While the stuff Nutomic has said is awful, I'd also really like to see instances of moderation on lemmy.ml that are problematic/transphobic before making the call to defederate.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] -5 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Did you contact their mods or admins? They should have an opportunity to administer appropriate action first. Then, if they are ok with this bullshit, de-fed.

Meanwhile, may I endorse a cool shirt that people might want to wear this summer:

https://www.punkwithacamera.com/products/chaos-marine-trans-people-existing-does-nothing-negative-to-your-life-you-cry-baby-bitch-40k-gutter-press?_pos=3&_sid=9fae89d95&_ss=r

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 73 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Personally, I don't think his shitty views necessarily translate into .ml moderation policy and action, which to me would be the problem that defederation is meant to solve.

That said, I wouldn't mind defed-ing from them in general, as most of my unpleasant interactions in the fediverse have been with .ml users.

Ultimately, I'll back Ada on what she thinks and decides. She's very level headed and strict with other instances as far as blahaj zones mission statement is concerned, and I trust her completely.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Defederate, and I would have said the same if you asked me yesterday.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 days ago

Yes. There should be no handwringing over this. If admins/mods for an instance are bigoted, fash, or other such things then they deserve to get defederated as they will allow many bad things and spread their hate. It is best to isolate them as they want to spread their hate and convert more people, that's their entire goal.

[–] [email protected] 38 points 2 days ago

This looks like a fight trying to be picked, not something to defederate over.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 days ago

I never really liked his ideas, trans-related or not, but why the hell was he saying all of that just for a (presumably) message about a Firefox plugin???????

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Admin Ping for @[email protected] to weigh in on this issue with her thoughts and opinions on the matter.

[–] [email protected] 72 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Nutomic was banned from this instance approximately 9 months ago when I first become aware of his stance. However, it's not something I plan on defederating over unless it becomes clear that the instance as a whole is not acting on transphobic content or unless it becomes clear that the community strongly believes that we should defederate.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

What statement about transgender people are we talking about?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

Sigh, if you must know, here is the context:

CW: Transphobic talking points

I thought more people had seen this since it's older and pinned in MeanwhileOnGrad.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 days ago

allowing biological men to compete

I don’t go to this school, but this line seems irredeemably constructed.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 67 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

Personally, I have a very poor opinion of nutomic. And yes, he has always been/felt transphobic. He has a history of making massive oversteps to attack people that have differing opinions to his, and overall I believe him to be a threat to the trans community. As for whether we should defederate? I really have no clue. It certainly isn't a bastion for blatant transphobia, and hosts many of the top Lemmy communities, and a very large amount of the active Lemmy userbase. I think the effects of defederation would be immense, and take a lot of time and consideration to understand if it's overall beneficial to the community. That being said, I'm sure I could be swayed to support either side. I'd be very curious what Ada has to say about this, as I believe I'll support her opinion on the matter.

EDIT: I think it's valuable to point out that any individual user can block an instance in their settings. So regardless of any defederation decision (which Ada seems opposed to), anyone can choose to block the instance themselves.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 days ago (3 children)

That is partially why I opened this thread. A community discussion is something that could be beneficial here in deciding what to do. There could be a lot of fallout from defederation though I don't feel like it would be particularly bad since most communities on Lemmy.ml are already a thing elsewhere, and have more users there too, and most people who want to be here already have accounts here or would very quickly and easily make accounts here or on an instance that federates with us.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Although I don’t agree with nutomic’s stance (nor do I have any previous experience with them) the tone and language isn’t rude. It’s important to take that into consideration. There’s a difference between discussing opinions and just mindlessly slinging insults.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Regardless of the tone, the opinions he is discussing and the ways that he represents his views are inherently transphobic. He and his views are a threat to us at Blahaj Lemmy, being a space for queer folks (many of us are trans). He is also the lead developer of Lemmy, and the head admin of lemmy.ml. A statement does not have to be framed as a direct insult to be hateful and harmful, and the fact that these views of his have been persistent, along with his influence, means that he as a user is dangerous. Hence why he has been banned from this instance. The question being discussed is really if his views are reflected into the community and moderation at lemmy.ml, because that is the point at which the instance is harmful enough to defederate from. If lemmy.ml is a place where transphobia is allowed to propagate, then that is immensely harmful for us. We need to protect ourselves against transphobia.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago (2 children)

All I ask is that it not be ignored completely. I’m not close enough to the situation to make any decisions.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I mean, the two big communities for me are [email protected] and [email protected], though the latter of which isn't really active anyway so I wouldn't be sad to see it go. There isn't a suitable replacement for the Linux community elsewhere, and that's honestly what I'm most active on, but if we defeferate, I'd probably just cut my losses. Yes, it is easy for people to create new accounts, but the hassle is that you cannot transfer your comments or posts to a new account, so you lose that history (as I've had to deal with). But overall, I think most people on ml would just stop seeing posts from our instance and never think about it. It would be a small minority that would even notice, but the majority would be getting less content from diverse voices in the queer community overall. Again, it would just take a lot of consideration.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

There isn’t a suitable replacement for the Linux community elsewhere

What about [email protected] or [email protected]? Those seem decently active.

but the hassle is that you cannot transfer your comments or posts to a new account

That is a minor drawback. It would be nice if they implemented ownership transfer abilities for posts and comments, though it'll probably be a while before we see that.

But overall, I think most people on ml would just stop seeing posts from our instance and never think about it. It would be a small minority that would even notice, but the majority would be getting less content from diverse voices in the queer community overall. Again, it would just take a lot of consideration.

I can see how and why this would be a problem and why this should be carefully considered, that can be a poor outcome. I guess the same can be said for any defederation including the feddit.uk one. It all depends I guess on how they handle these issues going forward and also how they handle this subject overall. If a lot of the people there are "I support trans people but I don't think kids..." (you get the idea) it doesn't really do much good to federate with them. At least in my opinion.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

What about [email protected] or [email protected]? Those seem decently active.

The former of the two (which is also the larger of them) has 13% of the userbase, although you're correct that it does seem fairly active. I suppose that would be a decent place to migrate to if defederation were to happen, although I tend to mostly help out new users, who tend to flock to the larger community. Again, I'd figure it out if it happened, it wouldn't actually be a problem. The latter of the two I would not consider very active by comparison.

That is a minor drawback. It would be nice if they implemented ownership transfer abilities for posts and comments, though it'll probably be a while before we see that.

Yes, this is one of the grievances I had when migrating here from lemmy.world, as I have some very detailed and helpful comments I wish were easier for me to find. I'd love to see that as a feature in the future, but I wouldn't get my hopes up.

I can see how and why this would be a problem and why this should be carefully considered, that can be a poor outcome. I guess the same can be said for any defederation including the feddit.uk one. It all depends I guess on how they handle these issues going forward and also how they handle this subject overall. If a lot of the people there are "I support trans people but I don't think kids..." (you get the idea) it doesn't really do much good to federate with them. At least in my opinion.

Yes, I agree here. What I suppose I'm basically trying to say is that defederation is an extreme option, so it has to be considered carefully. If the community on ml starts to reflect transphobic views, then absolutely that would warrant defederation. But if it's a single admin, and it's otherwise being moderated to remove transphobic content, then I do think it's really difficult to determine without a lot more consideration. In most other situations, banning a single transphobic user may be sufficient. It all depends on how his views are reflected in the moderation and the content of the community as a whole. If it's resulting in transphobia, then it becomes a much more clear case. I don't have enough information to know if that is in fact the case.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 days ago (3 children)

yeah. i mean isn’t this what downvotes and bans are for? instead of defederation?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Blahaj.zone doesn't enable downvotes. As for bans. Sure. If it's a handful of one-off users. But if this speaks to the larger instance culture on .ml that's where defederation is considered, and because it's one of the lead admins, it speaks to their ability and willingness to keep their instance safe.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)

lemmy.blahah.zone does not allow downvotes. And the concern is moreso that some transphobic content wouldn't be moderated (based on nutomic's views), hence the burden of moderation would come down to our instance's admins, and that simply shouldn't be their responsibility. Defederation is for situations in which the instance in question is harmful to the community in the instance defederating. And if transphobia is not properly moderated, and transphobic views are allowed to spread, then that is actively harmful to lemmy.blahaj.zone.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

gotcha. i figured all posts could be up/downvoted. kinda still new here.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›