this post was submitted on 07 May 2025
1694 points (99.6% liked)

People Twitter

6935 readers
1198 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 208 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (11 children)

Bytes, my man, you need an archived link. https://nitter.net/PabloReports/status/1919822694477947003#m

Edit: A reminder to go after the argument, not the users. No troll baiting.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 20 hours ago

I wouldn't be surprised if some cop who ate there wasn't happy with the service he got and organised this shenanigan

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Cops will take as much freedom as you give them and often they will attempt more than they have been granted. Never give cops an inch they are not legally entitled to. In democracies, laws exist to grant people freedom from the power of the state, not to grant the state freedom from the power of the people. Any laws that grant cops protection from the people are laws of a tyranny. We get only the protections of the state that our rights make possible and no more. Trading freedom for security gets us neither.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

(deleted duplicate)

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

In democracies, laws exist to grant people freedom from the power of the state, not to grant the state freedom from the power of the people. Any laws that grant cops protection from the people are laws of a tyranny. We get only the protections of the state that our rights make possible and no more. Trading freedom for security gets us neither.

Correction: In democracies, laws exist to grant power to the state, not to grant people freedom from the state. For example, I'm guessing that in your nearest democracy, there's probably not a law granting you the freedom to stand still for more than a minute or lie down for more than a minute. The people's freedom is a default.

Now, perhaps what you were thinking of was that some laws have exceptions (that might be phrased as affirmative defenses). But those aren't granting freedom to the people, they are restricting law enforcement. It's like a "tax refund" — the government isn't giving you their money, it's returning your own money.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 hours ago

Funnily enough, if I am not violating parking regulations, or being a public issue, I am free to sleep in my car, or chill on a bench all day, in my home state.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

🎶 Stack em high. Stack em high. While they gurgle bleed and die! 🎶

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago

The only disappointing part of the article is that the 2 brown shirts continued to live.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

"Batches? We doan need no stinking batches!"

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 day ago (4 children)

They could be ICE, they could also be the KKK.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

why did you say the same thing twice

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

America's Gestapo

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

Indeed, my thoughts exactly.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

¿Por que no las dos?

load more comments
view more: next ›