this post was submitted on 06 May 2025
474 points (98.6% liked)

News

29476 readers
3021 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

White House proposes giving out $5,000 checks to address falling birthrates amid growing ‘pronatalist’ movement

One of Donald Trump’s priorities for his second term is getting Americans to have more babies – and the White House has a new proposal to encourage them to do so: a $5,000 “baby bonus”.

The plan to give cash payments to mothers after delivery shows the growing influence of the “pronatalist” movement in the US, which, citing falling US birthrates, calls for “traditional” family values and for women – particularly white women – to have more children.

But experts say $5,000 checks won’t lead to a baby boom. Between unaffordable health care, soaring housing costs, inaccessible childcare and a lack of federal parental leave mandates, Americans face a swath of expensive hurdles that disincentivize them from having large families – or families at all – and that will require a much larger government investment to overcome.

(page 5) 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 93 points 2 weeks ago (16 children)

$5000? Does Trump still think it's the 1950s?

[–] [email protected] 50 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I sizable chunk of the populace seems to harbor similar delusions

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)
[–] [email protected] 72 points 2 weeks ago (12 children)

Hey non-Americans, fun fact! If you have a baby here, you can expect $15,000+ in hospital bills.

$5,000 should cover that, right?

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Trump: "Gotta save the government money"

Also Trump: "Just throw money at it, maybe it will fix itself"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 26 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Why do I have a feeling the administration would still try to find ways to not pay nonwhite families having kids?

Trump was propped up by people who believe this bogus "Great Replacement" theory and I don't think they would be willing to back down from that stance on account of a generally declining population.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 76 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Give me one year paid family leave and Medicare for all, then we'll talk.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Maybe a grant for college as well, so I can get a degree so that I might actually be able to participate in society at large.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Add at least one zero to that, ideally two.

[–] [email protected] 64 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Other countries have tried this, and it was a spectacular failure

His arrogance means that he's incapable of learning from others though, so good fucking luck

[–] [email protected] 36 points 2 weeks ago (9 children)

It's not a monetary issue, otherwise the middle class would have more kids than the poor, which isn't the case. It's simply that when given the right and the means to control how many kids they have, people choose to not have enough to renew the population.

Same pattern everywhere as women gain rights over their body and as contraceptives become available. Even in periods where there was a strong middle class, even in countries where socio-economic inequalities aren't as much an issue. Northern European countries and Quebec are some of the places with the most socio-economic equity and their birthrate is down the drain.

[–] [email protected] 45 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

Turns out having kids is hard on a body, and I don’t blame any woman for not wanting to go through that.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 125 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

$5000???

Hahahahaha

Give me a house. Anything short of 1500 sqft, 3br, 1.5ba, on a half acre or more is just not enough for my gf and I to even consider.

And we are both gainfully employed.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 weeks ago (9 children)

I get the sentiment here, but a half acre is a lot of land and the development of large suburban lots is a big thing that contributed to the housing crisis in north america. We need to diversify housing and increase the number of 1000-2000 sqft apartments as well. Relatively small homes on smaller lots (1/4 acre and under) should also be being built.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›