My parents think NASA controls the weather. So this tracks.
this post was submitted on 05 May 2025
291 points (98.3% liked)
News
29203 readers
3989 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
It is amazing how much "crazy" mirrors rule 34. If you can think it up, someone has a conspiracy theory about how it is being used to harm or control the general public.
education much?
Russian PSYOP
Seriously playing out like Canadian bacon?
Wtf are the writers thinking?
I didn't know there is whole group of people trying to kill Gary Burghoff.
Wrong conspiracy idiots
Based on the title, I could easily believe this was an accurate description of the American regime.
No I will not validate it by calling it a government.
This militia brought to you by AccuWeather.
I don't really think that's the case, but I am wondering if it's actually illegal to spread disinformation that might gently direct these nutjubs at specific targets.
Nah, all the US weather corporations source their initial material from NOAA. This includes radar data both raw and processed (storm locations, storm tracks, hail potential and mesocyclones). Anyone living in an area that gets severe weather. I live in tornado alley and am absolutely terrified that something could happen to the nexrad site near me with severe weather season going on right now.
At this point it wouldn't be surprising if acting on "official" orders
It’s unclear what the group believes the radars are doing. The NEXRAD, or “next generation radar,” network has been in place since the 1990s and detects precipitation in the atmosphere. It can also help pinpoint tornadoes and severe thunderstorms, prompting timely, life-saving warnings. The system is also used by the Federal Aviation Administration and the US Air Force
Among other actions, NOAA’s security office advises that the NWS implement a buddy system when working at remote sites and be alert for suspicious activity.
[...]
The security threat comes at a time of turmoil for the NWS, with many offices short-staffed due to hundreds of Trump administration layoffs and early retirements.
This does not end well.
Edit: I hope it doesn't get as bad as I can imagine.
I'm trying to be less pessimistic but this doesn't sound good.
Some sort of group sponsored by shareholders that want to privatize noaa but still get socialisms funding from actual working Americans. So all is profit and paying the larping group through foreign dark money?
Jesus Christ. There's an actual takeover of your government that you guys can use your guns on. Cosplaying losers.
You forget, they want this as well. Donald loves the uneducated.
Only if we organize, and that’s not as easy as it looks given:
- Vast geography, and
- I wouldn’t even know who to trust to follow through
But the radars wont shoot back
Jan 6 showed us that they only go after low personal risk targets they think they can attack with impunity but whine like little snowflakes when they get caught and have to pay a price. They were shocked when the law came after them.
That’s why they attack radars, non-violent protests from the Left, or things like power substations as you mentioned. Nobody’s shooting back and the odds of getting caught are low.
Those dummies think they're the good guys.
Round them up and put them in front of a jury and then treat their mental illness.
The group Veterans on Patrol, which the Southern Poverty Law Center defines as an anti-government militia organization
Aww. You guys were this close to a meaningful 2A and then Doppler radars 🤣 Roll again.
Lets also not forget that Southern Poverty Law Center no longer is the highly regarded organization it once were. They've been labeling people such as Ayaan Hirsi Ali as anti-muslim extremists for example.
Definitely conservatives.
I’ll one up you and say MAGAts, mainly because I know ONE guy who was hardcore conservative, and still is, but is as anti-Trump as I am.
Lucky you.
I have a whole family tree, some very religious, some not, almost all invested in Trump. The rest are hard Democrats.
The Trumpers are very into Facebook.
Actually, there is one kinda libertarian, and I’m not sure who they voted for… but it was not Harris or any Democrats for sure. And they kinda dismiss Trump as “noise” that will eventually go away.
I mean, I can envision how plausible this sounds.
Much of this tech is hand-me-down military radar. There are adjacent tiny grains of truth, like energy weapons allegedly used to target diplomats, very slight correlations in studies on the dangers of radio/microwave-range radiation to humans, scary-sounding geoengineering papers, really scary military projects and so on.
Now, picture yourself in these people’s shoes. You have virtually no background in science. You’re in an information environment, immersed on Facebook and your neighbors and pastors and online influencers everything, where climate change is a hoax, where FEMA is corrupt and hostile, as is much of the government. Maybe chemtrail or cloud seeding theories are on your, err, radar.
…Thousands, if not millions of people live in this state.
Now the NWS is politicized and liberal. People make the connection with them and climate science.
…This is not a big jump. It’s a really tiny one.
The US has been at the edge of many similar thresholds, and we’re gonna cross a ton of them very soon.
Now, picture yourself in these people’s shoes.
Ankle boots from military surplus stores?
Standing in the basement surrounded by food buckets they bought during ad breaks on OANN.
Meh, let them weaken their country so a good invader can take over and correct the bullshit
I don't think there is any such thing as a "good invader".
Based on USA slipping in to Nazi dictatorship, what could be a "bad" invader?
North Korea? Somalia?
Seems the same if Trump gets his wau
There have been a few. The Allies in WWII leap immediately to mind.
But in this case I don't see why anyone would do this for America.
I dont see anyone that could. Even a weakened US is likely to have nukes, and a fair few of them, a hypothetical invader that is not Canada or Mexico (which would have to deal with having a smaller population and a much worse economy, or a much smaller population) has to deal with crossing an ocean and therefore building an extremely large naval capability. And finally, whoever it is would have to occupy a huge area with a population of over 300 million.
In the European theater? Maybe on the western front you could argue that was true but absolutely not on the eastern front. The Red Army was the cause of so many rapes and warcrimes on their way to Berlin. Not to mention their occupation of Eastern Europe, setting up on puppet states and later genocide in Eastern Europe. The western front also had plenty of rape cases caused by an army passing through. Definitely better than the eastern front but still heavily impacted the regions they passed through.
The Pacific theater is a bit of a question mark. The Japanese were absolutely awful, worse than the Nazis in quite a few ways. But from the sheer intensity of the fighting over here it is not a pleasant experience for anyone involved. Especially if you were a Japanese citizen during the island hopping campaign. There are plenty of reports of mass suicides being committed out of fear of what the US could do to them, to the US’ credit they did send interpreters to try to talk them out of it. Then there is the ethical question of the usage of the nuclear bombs, I am not going to give my opinion, this is one you must decide for yourself. The Chinese front is another complicated topic, there’s the Japanese with their brutality in things like the Rape of Nanking and there is what would be Maoist China, the Republic of China (who I don’t know enough about to make an argument on) and the USSR who is also here to complete the shit sandwich.
The North African front I know the least about so I am not even going to discuss it.
I don't count those as invasions because the goal wasn't the seizure of any resource. WWII kicked off from the Nazi invasion of Poland, and the Allies fought them all the way back to Berlin, then gave Germany back (mostly, except the partitioning and the permanent military bases).
view more: next ›