this post was submitted on 01 May 2025
869 points (98.9% liked)

Uplifting News

15107 readers
124 users here now

Welcome to /c/UpliftingNews, a dedicated space where optimism and positivity converge to bring you the most heartening and inspiring stories from around the world. We strive to curate and share content that lights up your day, invigorates your spirit, and inspires you to spread positivity in your own way. This is a sanctuary for those seeking a break from the incessant negativity often found in today's news cycle. From acts of everyday kindness to large-scale philanthropic efforts, from individual achievements to community triumphs, we bring you news that gives hope, fosters empathy, and strengthens the belief in humanity's capacity for good.

Here in /c/UpliftingNews, we uphold the values of respect, empathy, and inclusivity, fostering a supportive and vibrant community. We encourage you to share your positive news, comment, engage in uplifting conversations, and find solace in the goodness that exists around us. We are more than a news-sharing platform; we are a community built on the power of positivity and the collective desire for a more hopeful world. Remember, your small acts of kindness can be someone else's big ray of hope. Be part of the positivity revolution; share, uplift, inspire!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 3) 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 19 points 3 weeks ago (9 children)

Whatever happened to “solar shingles”? There were supposed to be a couple of companies making them, but you never see them on houses.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 3 weeks ago

They are more expensive and less efficient. Very few people use them.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 weeks ago (9 children)

I like it, but with housing prices already out of control I wonder if this is the wisest? It's just going to make housing that much more expensive. Long term it's great! But I hope they have some fancy financial footwork to curb the upfront costs.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 weeks ago (7 children)

In long term, you would not be paying much on electricity, which is a saving. The upfront cost would be higher, but it is a good move imo, because retrofitting almost always has some shortcomings, like poor implementation, or unnecessary damage

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 57 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I heard our glorious leader will be making an upcoming EO mandating all homes be retrofitted with coal-burning stoves.

Oh say can you see

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 weeks ago

He's the Uncle in Nepokean Dynamite, but it's like he's stuck somewhere between mid to late last century..

[–] [email protected] 27 points 3 weeks ago (33 children)

While solar power is great and possibly the future, I sure hope they fully thought this through. A lot of areas with large numbers of solar panels are struggling to manage overcapacity. Solar energy produced is not always sent to the grid but wasted, as there is often not enough grid-scale storage capacity to absorb it. I'm no expert, but I wonder if mandating smart in-home sodium-ion batteries which intelligently charge and discharge based on grid capacity wouldn't be more effective.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

California's weather definitely isn't England's

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago

Absolutely. But I also read about these concerns in The Netherlands and Belgium, which aren't quite California.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

It definitely would be a good idea to put some SIBs in every place that produces intermittent energy.

Also, energy intensive places might want to get batteries too. Let’s say you have an aluminiun factory, which obviously needs lots of energy 24/7. How about you use cheap (or even free) solar power when there’s oversupply to charge the batteries, and discharge them during the night.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

incidentally i contacted a few local solar installation companies and all of them told me my roof doesn't have enough space, but one of them suggested to get a battery and go on a peak/offpeak tariff as this would be more effective than trying to fit solars to my crazy roof

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 23 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

The UK is no where near the point of having too much power through the daytime. Today was pretty sunny, better than average day especially for time of year. At mid day there was still 5.8GW of fossil fuel use and 3GW of biomass, so about 8.8 GW of CO2 production. Or to put it another way of the 32.5 GW of power needed solar contribute 3.41GW.

There will come a moment where there is an issue where more storage is required to use that power through the evening and night or negative power pricing but its not the issue yet there still isn't enough renewables to make it through a day without burning gas even on a windy sunny day so promoting more Solar and Wind is still necessary to get to netzero for grid power in 2030.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 28 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

We actually have a growing amount of gravity battery capacity in the UK, currently a drop in the ocean around 15GWh, but I believe 200% of that is currently in construction.

IIRC the same article I read about this suggested we could make use of all the old coal mines, retrofit them to become gravity batteries relatively cheaply and gain magnitudes more capacity than we have today.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 weeks ago

I'm sure I read something about using local battery stores. Similar to the battery solution you suggested, but with each battery being shared across multiple neighbours

load more comments (27 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 weeks ago

That’s actually pretty expedient

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›