this post was submitted on 25 Apr 2025
1177 points (99.3% liked)

News

29101 readers
4514 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Luigi Mangione is accused of stalking United Healthcare CEO Brian Thompson and shooting him to death on Dec. 4, 2024.

(page 3) 37 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 128 points 6 days ago (5 children)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 66 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I told you he didn't do it!

[–] [email protected] 21 points 6 days ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 93 points 6 days ago (4 children)

Luigi Mangione is a hero of the people.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 29 points 6 days ago

Good. All the best to him.

[–] [email protected] 73 points 6 days ago (4 children)

Free this man. The wealthy psychopaths need something to be fearful of as it's the only emotional trigger that will keep their behavior from genociding the poor.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

He was halfway around the country eating ice cream with me.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 days ago

At least he's wearing armor now.

[–] [email protected] 44 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Federal prosecutors claimed in their new filing that Mangione deserves the death penalty because of "the impact of the victim's death upon his family, friends and co-workers" and because "he expressed intent to target an entire industry and rally political and social opposition to that industry, by engaging in an act of lethal violence."

I just want to remind everyone of the impact of many of Thompson's murders on their family, friend, and co-workers, all in the service of the money masters' sheer, unadulterated, insatiable greed.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 6 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (2 children)

Also we literally only know his thoughts on the matter because they released excerpts of his journal. If he was trying to rally political and social opposition, you'd think he would have published a manifesto himself.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 26 points 6 days ago (3 children)

Does the public have any information on the evidence they have that he did it? What I have read about all sounds like a weak case with what I suspect is a mountain of inadmissible evidence gathered by methods outside of laws that would apply to the non elite class.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 74 points 6 days ago

Who's that guy? Doesn't look like the guy they were searching for. At all.

[–] [email protected] 225 points 6 days ago (3 children)

Solidarity aside, whenever you are arraigned, any lawyer worth their salt will advise you to plead not guilty, because entering a guilty plea means it's over, move on to sentencing, where you have no leverage at all.

You can always change a not guilty plea to a guilty plea later, if a plea deal offered by the prosecution is acceptable to you. This is especially relevant in a case where the death penalty is on the table, but also applies to the possibility of reduced charges or penalties in any case.

I'll also add that this case could well end up with an Alford plea. In short, where the defendant asserts innocence, does not admit to the criminal act, but accepts the sentence because they believe that a jury would find them guilty based on the evidence. Again, this is definitely related to a case where the death penalty is on the table.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 days ago

Because of this fact a lot of courts will just automatically enter a not guilty plea during your first appearance now.

[–] [email protected] 145 points 6 days ago (8 children)

I'd be very disappointed in any jury who found him guilty

[–] [email protected] 26 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Realistically they'll try arrange one that will. They're going to try secure a guilty verdict by any means necessary to make an example out of him.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 119 points 6 days ago (4 children)

Having been on a jury,

People are dumb and have no empathy

[–] [email protected] 71 points 6 days ago

~~Having been on a jury~~

People are dumb and have no empathy

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (3 children)

In federal Court the judge has a lot more control in the composition of the jury., they even lead voir dire.

They can pick a jury of all ceos if they want.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

That would be a bold choice, and I don't think it would work out well overall. In terms of the public response. And imagine the security, it would be locked down harder than any place in the world.

Although in all seriousness, in a normal setting they might be challenged if they chose an all-CEO jury. You can't fill a jury with the potential target victims of the crime that is being accused. It would not be seen as fair by any stretch of the imagination.

If someone was a accused of targeting very tall men with pink hair, you couldn't fill the jury with people matching that description. Any sane person in the legal business would call them crazy.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 30 points 6 days ago (4 children)

Ideally, a jury's responsibility is to weigh the evidence and find whether the evidence supports a guilty verdict beyond a reasonable doubt.

There has been no jury selection yet, let alone presentation of evidence. I would guess that any jury nullification would depend on a defense tactic of "Yes, my client committed this act, and his motive was to prevent UHC from directly causing the deaths of their customers by refusing to honor legitimate claims or by delaying payment of claims." There might be something there, especially since UHC changed its stance on something (I forget exactly what right now) in the wake of their CEO being killed.

But that would be a really difficult defense to mount. You'd basically be admitting to the act and hoping that at least one person on the jury would A) agree with your defense, and B) be willing to hold out over it, and C) not be replaced by an alternate for "failure to follow jury instructions" or some such thing.

Again, since a jury has not even been selected, I won't speculate on what evidence gets presented and what evidence (if any) ends up being excluded. By extension, I cannot agree with your above comment.

Please note that I am also not saying "He's guilty, he should hang", because that would also entail speculating on evidence.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 days ago (1 children)

They'll find 12 angry rich white women and its over for him. You know it, I know it. Dude martyrd himself from the beginning and I bet he knew it

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 6 days ago

"The man who saves his country breaks no laws" isn't that right DoJ?

[–] [email protected] 21 points 6 days ago

They don't have to say outright that the guy was scum and got what he deserved, just question why the federal charges are being brought while there's a state case and ask questions about how many other people would have a good reason to want this health insurance executive dead. You can introduce the message without abandoning all other defense and saying it explicitly.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 53 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Yeah that tracks. He was walking my dough at the time.

[–] [email protected] 41 points 6 days ago (2 children)

He was walking my dough at the time

Is that a new way to make bread?

[–] [email protected] 19 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 days ago

Mmmmm, barium bromide.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 6 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 135 points 6 days ago (2 children)

He's guilty of stealing my heart tho

[–] [email protected] 64 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Why, is he made of cheese?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 days ago

Guilty of my cholesterol.

[–] [email protected] 55 points 6 days ago (1 children)

whatever he's made of id eat the shit out of him.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 days ago

I mean, cheese is one thing. But if shit is your thing, who am I to judge.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›