Asklemmy

When did academic journals just start publishing nonsense? When did conspiracy theories like a shadow cabal of evil people that record the rich and powerful abusing children become obvious reality? When did literally hundreds of government officials state UFOs are real, they're not human, and there's a good chance they're not natural phenomena?

Science only has trust if you can trust those with the means to verify the work, do actually verify the work. The reproducibility crisis in all scientific fields was at a peak before LLMs were on every single phone; now there no such thing as trustworthy peer reviewed research that can be reproduced, even if the money was there to test everything that was published.

Tl;Dr the entire scientific world lost credibility and a whole lot of conspiracies were proven real as more CIA docs got declassified. Anything might be true at this point.

I think it's always been this way, but social media has for sure exacerbated it. People really want to believe there's some big order, some grand control, somebody in charge that all makes sense somewhere somehow.

"They" don't want you to know because its all about power and control is weirdly a lot more palatable than "shit just happens".

At some point we all got smart enough to realize that, even if everybody believes it, it still might be totally wrong.

1000 years ago that kind of thinking would get you burned at the stake.

So ya, progress.

You better start believe in conspiracy theories, because you're in one

Food is definitely a weird one. A lot of us were taught advertisement slop (the food pyramid) in science class. And we witnessed the boom and bust of fad ‘diets’ pushed by well-respected yet-to-be-disgraced lunatics. Nowadays both those things merged and live on as the Instagram ‘health and wellness’ influencer industry.

I feel in this new world ruled by social media and the need for online attention as a measure of self worth, conspiracy theories are the low hanging fruit answer to standing out and getting that attention.

https://www.pbssocal.org/food-discovery/food/revisiting-the-evils-of-the-food-pyramid

Food is a weird one. I've heard it wasn't just lobbyists but an attempt to drop inflation, by prioritizing low input foods over high input foods.

Honestly I think that this isn't in inherent to the modern world, in earlier ages it "they" was probably attributed to gods and what not. "Why does lightning spark fires in the fields": "They (the Gods) are probably angry at our insolence". Fast forward to the present where religion and the supernatural have less hold on human thinking and that type of idea is shifted to a nameless, faceless "they", orchestrating and manipulating events in secret.

For a fun look at this occurrence, read James Tynion's fantastic Department of Truth comic that deals with the truth and popular American conspiracy theories.

Paranoia is a survival trait dating back to our ape ancestors.

Mk ultra, contra, sterilization of native American women and the intentional infection of African Americans, operation snow white, operation mocking bird, 5 eyes, the business plot, the ongoing business plot 2.0

Uhhh that one room that's capturing the internet in real time, I forget it's name.

False flags throughout history.

I don't know, but I started realizing that nearly all of the holiday traditions I'd ever participated in originated by way of some well received piece of advertising. It's all a mess. It's all people lying to each other for power, influence, and resources back to the very beginning. The internet certainly allows for messages to travel and build to critical mass faster, but humanity and this behavior originated together, only the tools change.

• Actual conspiracies and manipulation (leading to probably most imperial wars of the 20th century till today)
• A justified distrust in the government, who people identify readily as not defending their interests in the slightest
• Conspiracy theories straight up cooked up by states to misdirect, or propagated heavily from media that are either state aligned or conveniently left unsanctioned
• The manufacturing of a climate of anti-science (in the US specifically)

Are the main reasons I can identify for why it's become such a norm. When things like MK Ultra, Cointelpro, Operation Gladio...etc are all declassified, the bar gets puts pretty fucking high for what states are willing and able to do.

Deconditioning. If we had a really serious full-on plague we'd eventually get casual about the corpse disposal wagon.

Because the government keeps lying about extremely dangerous stuff to make 5 bucks profit.

Case in point shell and otherd lobbying governments for decades to deny global warming.

Microplastics are showing up everywhere because of products which were supposed to be safe.

Israel controls half the Western governments not sure if it's still "antisemitic" to point that out

They is their preferred pronouns

I always suspected the trans were behind this

The Cholesterol thing is mostly true though.

Saturated fats aren't a problem for most people, trans fats are a problem. Saturated fats are what you get with things like meat, trans fats are what you get with processed foods and vegetable oils.

In the early 1900s a Dr. Stefansson MD lived with the Inuit for 6 months. He was used to the diet meta of the times which dictated a vegetable heavy diet was necessary for health, the Inuit don't have vegetables, they eat fish and fatty meat exclusively. He saw the Inuit as a healthy people and his own health improved during his time with them. He returned to the US and tried to spread his experience, he was dismissed because of racism towards the Inuit. They said that the diet and health of the Inuit has no relevance to the white man because the Inuit are primatives that have no culture or civilization.

He later did a study on himself and another man where they ate nothing but meat and had regular tests done. They were in perfect health, except when they ate too much lean meat and going back to fatty meats corrected the issue. Doctors, unwilling to find out what they knew was wrong, disregarded the study.

In the 50s, as a result of Eisenhower's heart attack, a study was done of diets in 22 countries and their rates of heart disease. Of those 22 countries, 6 of them were chosen to be the basis of the argument that saturated fats are bad because they showed a direct link between a diet higher in saturated fats and a higher rate of heart disease. When you look at all 22 countries, no such correlation can be drawn. That study was reported on heavily and saturated fats were now the cause of heart attacks.

Later on in the 70s the government got involved with nutrition and diet, in order to address the growing heart disease, and did what government does best and they fucked it up with a commission that was made up of politicians. They spent 10 years wanting to say that fats were bad because there was fatty deposits in patients with heart disease, so fat must be the problem. Their entire argument was that the cholesterol observed in hearts and arteries was a result of eating fatty foods. There was no evidence, only an unsupported hypothesis based on logic about as bulletproof as saying that meat makes maggots because you find maggots on meat. They pointed to the 1950s study as supporting evidence, they remember when it broke as news and held onto it religiously. Doctors at the time disagreed and wanted more studies done before saying that fatty foods were the problem. No evidence from those studies supported removing meat, nuts, cheese, and other fatty foods from your diet improved one's health. At the end of it, the commission declared that some fatty foods is ok but grains, fruits, and vegetables should be most of your diet.

The whole fat is bad argument comes from that dietary and nutrition commission. It was also the basis for the food pyramid, which has no foundation in nutritional science.

Epidemiological studies are an inflammatory aspect of the cholesterol issue. They are poorly conducted studies that show vague associations and then the media pulls small associations from and blow it up to say things like egg yolks cause a greater risk of hearth attack when the data they got didn't say that.

Tl;Dr: Eating lots of meat isn't a problem for cholesterol, you only think that because of decades of bad science.

So your friend isn't a conspiracy theorist, they just couldn't or wouldn't tell you all of that and what I wrote is like 10% of the whole story.

In regards to the beef guy. As someone who is on the carnivore diet, I’m guessing “they” are the lobbyists for Big Grain (or whatever) who fight to keep the Standard American Diet in place. You know, even though it hasn’t been working for decades and we’re fatter than ever.

(If anyone is curious, I was previously on carnivore to lose weight and it helped a lot. Nowadays I’m also on it because it’s the only thing that combats my long covid symptoms. Carnivore is an anti-inflammatory diet, so I guess it makes sense why it’s helping.)

Idk what material science is but it doesn’t sound like nutrition.

As someone getting their PhD I know a lot about my very specific sub topic in a very small field but that’s it. Who even has time to really know anything else? So point being highly educated people can still be bozos though they should have better research skills.