this post was submitted on 26 Jun 2025
723 points (97.6% liked)

Science Memes

15429 readers
1711 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
723
submitted 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 
(page 3) 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 177 points 3 days ago (4 children)

A guy on YT actually tried it experimentally a few years ago (how many slaps, not how fast one slap); and it works to some degree! The main problem becomes to make a slapping machine that can survive long enough:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LHFhnnTWMgI&pp=ygURc2xhcCBjb29rIGNoaWNrZW7SBwkJzgkBhyohjO8%3D

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 days ago

Excellent, physics in service of humanity!

[–] [email protected] 31 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (5 children)

The chicken has to exceed the boiling point of water for it to be cooked? Unless we’re making chicken caramels, I don’t think so.

Doing some math, I think it works out to 6,242 slaps or a single slap at 1,939 mph. Much more attainable.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

That 205C would just be the surface temperature of the chicken, not the average. Note that the calculation doesn't take into account the volume or radius

EDIT: No, I'm wrong. The calculation is for boiling the whole chicken. Who was this written by, a Brit?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Are you sure? The numbers in the ~~tweet~~ reddit post talk about total mass and heat capacity. So I think that means the entire bulk has that average temperature.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 3 days ago (2 children)

One thing’s for sure: a chicken slapped at 3726 mph won’t be very tasty. Or look too good.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

What, you don't like ~~vaporized~~ ionized poultry?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 43 points 3 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago (2 children)

How fast does it cook in a vacuum?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 days ago

I'd suspect it doesn't cook so much as, y'know, explode and dessicate

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)

How many wanks to choke my chicken?

[–] [email protected] 22 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I don't really know you, but your ex told me three strokes, tops

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›