this post was submitted on 11 Mar 2024
313 points (87.5% liked)

Not The Onion

12172 readers
694 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 10 points 7 months ago (2 children)

I feel like people take these way too seriously, like some of these comments sound like it's personal. Its just a movie/book series if some one wants to poke some fun then just let em.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

I think the problem is more that Tyson is "uMm AcHtUaLlY"ing in a way to try and be cool or funny, but it doesn't come off as cool or funny what-so-ever. It's just irritating.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

If its irritating then why bother engaging with it. There is a point where you can just ignore it because in the grand scheme of things, it doesn't change anything (or at least it shouldn't).

Idk I think he does it in some misguided attempt to try to educate people. I agree it is obnoxious though.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 7 months ago (1 children)

It's a scifi series, If in their universe sands can pass vibrations for a long range, they are welcome to do whatever they want.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

yeah, I don't care if a fantasy universe is inconsistent with our standards and physics.

I only care if its blatantly inconsistent within its own rules.

I like NDT, but the dude just loves to shitpost constantly like this and its tiresome.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (3 children)

Person who's only job is science and who is an expert on science comments about the science of things and people find a way to complain about it.

Let the man die on his silly hills. It's funny and harmless. Pull the damn stick out. Perhaps go pound sand.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 7 months ago

My bitch with him is he’ll say the most stoner ass thing in the most smug way possible like it’s some insight from god.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 7 months ago

Immediately after any sci-fi movie comes out:

Internet: hey sciencey person, how accurate was the science?

Sciencey person: not.

Internet: surprisedPikachuface.jpg

[–] [email protected] 9 points 7 months ago

He who touches the grass controls the universe

[–] [email protected] 39 points 7 months ago (3 children)

NdGT is a pretentious twat who needs to just shut up and sit down.

I swear the only time he’s relevant is when he’s bitching about some science fiction movie not being 100% accurate

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Eh, I'm fine with a little pedantry here and there.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

Comedy is hard

[–] [email protected] 18 points 7 months ago (2 children)

So, you're saying he should...pound sand?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

He should go and make a another season of Cosmos already.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

Like a thumper!

[–] [email protected] 8 points 7 months ago

Movie: "Y'all check out these space wizards who can pilot big space ships at FTL. Check out these giant worms that shit magic dust. Check out a Special Boy who can see the future."

NDT: "None of this is scientifically accurate."

I swear the only time he’s relevant is when he’s bitching about some science fiction movie not being 100% accurate

Taking an ice-pick to "Contact" because it isn't realistic, and posting it in Tyson's DMs every day until he deletes his account.

[–] [email protected] 38 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Science fiction not science facts. When was the book written again? And why is an Astrophysicist giving opinions on worm biology? Not his area of expertise?

[–] [email protected] 21 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

The specific thing he's bitching about is sand physics, that is that sand doesn't really 'thump'.

This is something that is actually specifically addressed in the book, I'm not sure about the movie; short version is that the sand and weather on Arrakis are weird, and the sand forms more solid areas than elsewhere.

So not only is he complaining about a minor (from a realism perspective, it's important in-universe) detail, he's also showing that he did not read the book

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Which is funny because on Earth sand actually does create resonant chambers in the desert dunes that do, under specific circumstances, drive sound hundreds of miles. It's the phenomenon of singing deserts, that goes from anywhere between low rumbles up to flute like warble, it's been documented since the times of Marco Polo. We even have squeaking sand beaches. So, as usual, the pedantic twat is actually technically incorrect.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago

In the movie, the first time Paul uses a thumper he has to dig in a few spots before he finds one that the thumper will work on.

load more comments
view more: next ›