this post was submitted on 11 Mar 2024
338 points (89.9% liked)

Technology

58123 readers
4505 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago

Capitalism.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago

I agree! We just need to kill capitalism for that to happen.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 6 months ago

He isn't wrong, but the pathways is by taxing the absolute fuck out of billionaires

[–] [email protected] 18 points 6 months ago

Sure. Just need to get a bunch of trillions hoarded away by billionaires and throw it at R&D to solve these problems and I bet it would happen.

These rich fuckers making proclamations like that yet somehow still expecting someone else to pay for the solutions.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 months ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 6 months ago

Artificial General Intelligence

[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 months ago

Adjusted Gross Income.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 6 months ago

I gotta find a way to filter out techbros from my feed.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 6 months ago

We don't even have NGI.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago

It's very rational, it's always been mocked and looked down upon to be optimistic. But through the ages it has been proven to be true that we achieve much more than we imagine.

However the pessimism built in to most people probably helps this drive and is actually a good thing.

[–] [email protected] 38 points 6 months ago

The thing that keeps us from living lives of abundance is not a lack of technology.

[–] [email protected] 57 points 6 months ago (3 children)

Abundance is already here, tons of food are destroyed and thrown out when they accidentally make too much while people are starving, there's no money in abundance, it's the artificial lack of supply that keeps prices high and profits soaring.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

Have you read Ishmael?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

Approximately 1/3 of all food produced is wasted.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Food isn't the only resource in the equation. Most of the resources are limited and even diminishing.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I agree but I think their point was more along the lines of "Even if we have complete abundance of everything (as in, the capabilities to produce anything in abundance), capitalists will continue to create artificial lack of supply to continue profiting off of the workers. For example, look at the food abundance we have"

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

capitalists will continue to create artificial lack of supply

I think it's not that, but just:

capitalists won't spend their money to create logistical chains for free.

"Collect and distribute supply" won't do itself, someone should do that. And noone will do that for free

[–] [email protected] 31 points 6 months ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 6 months ago

This reads like Musk promising everyone that his imaginary train will be faster and cheaper than everything else.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 6 months ago
[–] [email protected] 25 points 6 months ago

Every rich tech bro has convince themselves they are the savior of the world.

[–] [email protected] 52 points 6 months ago

It's just bait for investors. This is the kind of crap that gets people with money and zero understanding of computers to buy stocks.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Great... And and will this abundance be shared or hoarded for profit like everything else that is abundant already is?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago
[–] [email protected] 19 points 6 months ago

Just put it in chatgpt I'm sure it will figure it all out

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 months ago

Aah, the innocence of 2022.. 🫠

[–] [email protected] 69 points 6 months ago (3 children)

The current state of capitalism will ensure the second line never sees the light of day

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

No no, they're desperately looking for that, because gating infinite abundance away from the plebs will be amazing for quarterly profits and entertainment! Think of all the reality shows you can make by pitting the poor against themselves!

[–] [email protected] 26 points 6 months ago (1 children)

We can already create enough abondance that no human starves, sleep outside or can't affotd medical treatment. Still look at the world.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago

Why bother to let humans live if they are not profitable enough for the megacorps? That almost sounds like work.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 6 months ago (1 children)

deregulated capitalism is a curse on society

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago
[–] [email protected] 15 points 6 months ago (1 children)

He's not wrong. He's probably not going to be the guy leading the charge on any of that but he's not wrong.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 6 months ago (2 children)

He's forgetting about the part where it'll be monetized in such a way that only the rich will benefit.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

You're not exactly wrong but at the same time we all benefited from the invention of say electricity or computing. If they do invent fusion or something I'm sure we'll get benefits. Maybe not free power but at the very least that allow us to buy it.

With access to that much power we could desalinate seawater on an industrial scale or power some of the carbon capture technologies. It will make things better.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago

Check again. He never said it wouldn't!

He's not forgetting: that's what he's proposing!

load more comments
view more: next ›