this post was submitted on 16 Apr 2025
216 points (98.2% liked)

Global News

3796 readers
465 users here now

What is global news?

Something that happened or was uncovered recently anywhere in the world. It doesn't have to have global implications. Just has to be informative in some way.


Post guidelines

Title formatPost title should mirror the news source title.
URL formatPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
[Opinion] prefixOpinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title.
Country prefixCountry prefix can be added tothe title with a separator (|, :, etc.) where title is not clear enough from which country the news is coming from.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. No social media postsAvoid all social media posts. Try searching for a source that has a written article or transcription on the subject.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

Icon generated via LLM model | Banner attribution


If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @[email protected].

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The White House said the higher tariff is as a result of Chinese retaliation.

Archived version: https://archive.is/20250416092702/https://www.newsweek.com/china-245-trump-tariff-2060295


Disclaimer: The article linked is from a single source with a single perspective. Make sure to cross-check information against multiple sources to get a comprehensive view on the situation.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 days ago

All of those numbers mean absolutely nothing. As soon as the price is higher than shipping it through Singapore it's useless.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

wtf they beat the Turkish car tariffs

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

it was the highest in the world, used to be, before trump

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 week ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

Lol we got a fentanyl tariff now🤣

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

A post 6 hours old. I give a 50% chance, that the number is outdated.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 week ago

This headline is bullshit. The correct headline would be "Americans now face 245% Trump tariff on Chinese goods". No need to spread misinformation about how tariffs work.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

hahaha line go brrrrrrr

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Welp when the debt defaults and everyone stops using American dollars or hold their gold here, then better hope we don’t all become forced to use crypto like El Salvador (which is probably the blueprint plan).

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Nah, its not over 9000 yet.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

We could call it the BFT 9000.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yeah because they excempted the main imports so now they can jack it up to whatever to look tough even though they already conceded.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

No, they walked that back almost immediately. The tariffs are still on everything.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Damn, I can't keep up with this shit

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

That's ok. Neither can they.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

China should just one up him in a way that doesn't let him one up them: complete embargo

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

"Oh yeah? Complete embargo PLUS ONE!!"

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

245% embargo. If you dare try to export things to the US, you're getting 245% of it back.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

The bad part being that the stuff over 100% will be poorly-made American knockoffs.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Doesn't matter whether it's a 80% (or whatever it was, basically changes on a whim) or 245%. There is no difference.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

It does make a difference. Let's say a thing you need about once a month to run your business was 10 dollars from China. You can get a similar product in the US, but it's 30 dollars. At 80%, it's still cheaper to get from China, 18 bucks. At 245%, it's now 24.50 to buy from China. Still cheaper than buying from the US, but now way more expensive.

I know these are made up numbers, but it isn't that unusual for US made items to be 3-10x the price of making it in 'cheap labor' countries. Also, this assumes there is a comparative replacement made in the US. But many machine parts have no analog or are proprietary, you must buy it from China or end that part of your business.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Your point is fairly good but you need to recheck your math. At 145% a $10 product will be $24.50. At 245% it's gonna be $34.50. And that doesn't even take into account additional federal, state, and local taxes.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

Non-tarrif taxes would apply equally to foreign and domestic goods and can be ignored when comparing prices.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It was 145% last, before the current rate, for those curious. It only further cements your point, it no longer has real impact, importing from China is just as dead.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

These numbers are absolutely wild. Has anyone made a site for tracking this madness?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Many, it's all over the news. It seemingly changes based on emotion though, we thought it was 125% but it was really 145%.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I’ve seen a bunch of articles, each with just the latest number and a date. In order to make a nice graph out of all of them, I would need to set up some sort of webscraping project to pool the numbers together. I’ve also seen a bunch of articles that have other types of graphs and tables that don’t really answer my question. The data is out there, but it’s scattered all over the place.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

Don't know of any, sorry!

[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 week ago

Title should be "Americans face 245% Trump tariff on China"

load more comments
view more: next ›