this post was submitted on 12 Apr 2025
1389 points (99.4% liked)

memes

14186 readers
2845 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to [email protected]

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

FTL isn't possible, ERBs would pastafy any matter passing through them and there is no way to control the other end, and take Kardashev scale 3 civ at least (and that's even pretending the Kardashev scale isn't the purest daydream fantasy)

[–] [email protected] 26 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That's another solution to the Fermi paradox. FTL travel is impossible, but can't actually be proven to be impossible, so no one wants to be the sucker.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 days ago

Don’t have to fll. Just have to be a third faster to give them 1000 years head start

[–] [email protected] -5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Nah, they actually can't arrive faster due to time dialation.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 days ago

Where does it say the first ship is traveling near the speed of light?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Oops we forgot something. Sends him back.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

Also can someone check if I turned off the stove? Thx

[–] [email protected] 59 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Not only that, but 3000 years into the future, language has changed so much that the plural of SHEEP is now SHOOP

That's right, androids do dream of electric SHOOP

Shit's wild yo

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

1000 years alone is a wildly long time for language. Granted, written language and education are more accessible than ever, so I imagine language evolution will be significantly slower than it once was, but still I found this short of English over the past 1000 years to be really interesting

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/WLSBCs5vcgQ

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Have you seen how fast slang is evolving currently? I can't even imagine translating something like "chat, am I cooked?" to my grandma.

Also on a side note; have you noticed the rise in lisps?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago

True! Fad based language spreads like wildfire with modern tech! At the same time, I feel like trends like that fall out of favour just as fast. It's definitely a wild time for language evolution.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

3000 years is insanely long for language. Consider that the mother fucking alphabet was invented around 1000 BC*, and basically no languages that anyone still speaks existed in their modern forms. Homer hadn't written the Illiad and the Odyssey yet, and the standard Greek that came to be defined by these works had also yet to develop. If you went back to 1000 BC you'd have no idea what was going on.

*Although previous alphabets existed, the Phoenician alphabet that became the basis for pretty much all modern writing systems in Europe, North Africa, and Western Asia was invented around 1100 BC

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Dude, listen to 1000 CE English. It's 90% jibberish even at that point.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It's also possible that audio recording being a thing that exists will slow changes in language as well.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

You gotta have a wake up protocol.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›