this post was submitted on 10 Apr 2025
372 points (99.5% liked)

News

28767 readers
3561 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

The Republican-led House passed a bill 219–213 to curb federal district judges from issuing nationwide injunctions, a response to judges rulings against Trump-era policies.

The bill restricts relief to affected parties only, not nationwide. Republicans argue liberal judges are blocking Trump's agenda, while Democrats say courts are striking down illegal orders. GOP lawmakers also seek to limit funding for enforcing broad injunctions.

The bill faces slim chances in the Senate.

The Congressional Research Service reported 17 nationwide injunctions so far in Trump’s second term, compared to 86 in his first.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

This is not surprising at all. The Trump regime will be gaining absolute power step-by-step using the russian playbook but with accelerated timelines. Americans may cling to the idea of living in a democracy but it's no longer the case.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 week ago

They had ONE judge in the fifth circuit that hamstrung the entire Biden presidency. Now they think it’s not okay.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Judge: Not constitutional, NEXT

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Carved into the Supreme Court building:

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

That's a precedent, it was not in the constitution. People at the time just went along with it.

Laws are only enforced by the people. They could totally use a law to overturn Marbury v Madison and the most of the law enforcement / military would just think "seems legit" and go along with it. Separation of powers would be, for all intents and purposes, over (unless the boots on ground actually stop it)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

It's not just a precedent. It's the precedent that all legal scholars learn on their first day of US law school. It's a foundation stone of the US legal system. You tear that one down, and you've torn the system down.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Clarence Thomas: "I'll allow it"

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

"Now I gotta be getting on vacation. Harlan's RV is outside, gassed up, and ready to roll!"

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Republicans better hope they never lose the House, Senate, White House, or Supreme Court. If so, shit will bull them over quick. Gun Laws will finally be fixed.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Nothing will happen. Democrats are completely spineless and will bend over like they have in the past.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 week ago

I vote with them, because there's no other choice, but if Democrats were given a magic lamp with three wishes, they'd negotiate it down to one and then wish for something they thought the republicans would like.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (2 children)

We should support democrats that believe in real change

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That would require the removal of most of them, not easily done with the extreme misinformation

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

Not most, just a majority.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

There's plenty of believers. None of them are acting in a meaningful way.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

Then they are not believers, they say it for personal gain.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 week ago

Lil Ole Magic Mike workin’ his fascist “Christian” magic

[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Republicans argue liberal judges are blocking Trump's agenda, while Democrats say courts are striking down illegal orders.

Well, when their agenda is composed primarily of illegal orders...

[–] [email protected] 78 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I mean, yeah. They want a king. I am, without any exaggeration or irony, surprised that they haven't tried to dissolve the legislative branch entirely yet.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

We'll see, I guess. I don't think this administration really needs rhyme, reason, or symbolism. They'll just do what the fuck ever when the fuck ever.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

Need? No. Want? Absolutely. This president craves attention.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

They have their Kombover King of Kaos, isn’t that enough for them???

[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 week ago

They want to keep the image of legislation and a reason to keep getting bribes. They're not ready for the complete shift yet. They're prepping us for it by effectively making him king so when they declare he is we're already used to it.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 week ago

Uh, because unconstitutional totally doesn't mean nationwide

load more comments
view more: next ›