this post was submitted on 09 Apr 2025
725 points (99.1% liked)

politics

23226 readers
3142 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said Tuesday that President Donald Trump is exploring legal pathways to “deport” U.S. citizens to El Salvador, where the administration has already arranged to house deported immigrants in a prison known for its human rights abuses.

(page 3) 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 111 points 3 weeks ago (6 children)

So yeah if that's the case then we need to seriously explore ways to remove him from office

[–] [email protected] 43 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Well, certainly we can count on the republicans to vote to impeach and convict once they see him disregard the constitution.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Why would they impeach him for something the Republicans on the Supreme Court will declare perfectly legal?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 85 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

So when is the rest of the world putting sanctions on El Salvador?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Wouldn't that just make them more reliant on the US for trade and funding?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 78 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

2nd amendment doesn't just apply for Nazis.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 weeks ago

Even if it did, not currently an obstacle.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 weeks ago (9 children)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] [email protected] 92 points 3 weeks ago (10 children)

Can't wait to find out if I've been vocal enough to be selected as a concentration camp candidate!

[–] [email protected] 21 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

At least we'll all have company...

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] [email protected] 167 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

Don’t worry guys! He only wants to deport the worst criminals! You know, like the enemies of the people. Now, who was it that he call the enemy of the people, again…?

[–] [email protected] 59 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (6 children)

I did not have "The Nazi's will outsource their gulags to El Salvador" on my fascism 2025 bingo card... I need to get more creative, or possibly criminally insane.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 81 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

Rapists, gang members, democrats, red haired people, wokists... You know. The enemy!

[–] [email protected] 26 points 3 weeks ago

Then finally the non-loyalists

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 100 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

Of course he does.

First they came for the socialists, and I did not speak out— Because I was not a socialist.

Then they came for the trade unionists, and I did not speak out— Because I was not a trade unionist.

Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out— Because I was not a Jew.

Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak for me.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

He already did and a judge ruled that he had to be brought back

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 52 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

First they came for the socialists ... But the US was coming for the socialists at the time, so that part is left out at the Holocaust museum memorial.

[–] [email protected] 68 points 3 weeks ago (7 children)

Actually first they came for LGBTQ+ people and scientists studying controversial subject matter, but the guy who wrote the poem was a conservative Catholic priest, so he didn't mind.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›