this post was submitted on 08 Apr 2025
685 points (99.1% liked)

Open Source

36971 readers
288 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 33 points 1 month ago

Lets encrypt could run a patreon and stay funded. Plenty of people with money depend on them.

[–] Cattail@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

we shouldn't need the government also we have made it fairly far

[–] SpiceDealer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 38 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

While it sucks that FOSS projects will have their funding sapped, let's remember why the open source model is used in the first place: it can't be bought. If it goes down, someone will just fork the last known repository and have it up and running again.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Aeri@lemmy.world 78 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I didn't know that the government was funding these things to begin with, but I don't know many things.

[–] Isaac@waterloolemmy.ca 37 points 1 month ago

I also didn't know this, but really we should all be putting money behind FOSS (myself included). We don't need billionaires.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 93 points 1 month ago (1 children)

So I guess funds were cut, but then the courts ruled the president doesn't have authority to do this himself since the funds were allocated by congress, and so as of now they have been restored, although congress needs to approve them every year and there's concern they might not do so for next year.

[–] Midnitte@beehaw.org 33 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Until Trump ignores court orders and cuts funding anyway.

Supreme Court will probably rule that while congress has the power of the purse, the president has the power of canceling the credit cards in the wallet, because fuck you that's why

[–] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 1 month ago

Well, this is what the relevant part of the video says:

USAGM disbursed $7.5M to these entities, in "what seemed to be an effort to delay the hearing or woo the judge". Regardless, the latter has sided against USAGM, and just a few days ago, the agency has decided to back off and release the funds for the 2025 fiscal year.

[–] Paddy66@lemmy.ml 92 points 1 month ago (7 children)

Urgh this is so backwards.

Governments need to fund more FOSS not less!

Hopefully the EU can increase its support to compensate.

[–] redsand@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 month ago

They are in order to get away from American products

[–] redwattlebird@lemmings.world 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I thought the EU was reducing funding to FOSS projects and investing more into AI. I could've sworn I read that somewhere last year.

Edit: https://www.theregister.com/2024/07/17/foss_funding_vanishes_from_eus/

I think it was this event that I read.

[–] HurlingDurling@lemm.ee 60 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Foss is free, and this guy is all about making the American people pay more money to his rich buddies

[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

He's doing a suck job of it. The things he's gutting are pennies towards his dark-souled oligarch masters. Cutting small government projects like the NEA, PBS or like FOSS grants is only used as an appeal to fiscal responsibility conservatives that aren't willing to cut into old-people benefits like Social Security and military sacred cows. Not because gutting tiny projects does anything useful, rather it gives the vibe that representatives are doing something.

This is an appeal to the imbicile MAGA though the tech bros might have specific FOSS projects that compete with their own commercial offerings. Not enough to cut all FOSS grants, though.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] yet_another_commie@lemmygrad.ml 18 points 1 month ago (1 children)

A great opportunity for China to get into open source

[–] stink@lemmygrad.ml 25 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They open sourced deepseek and the US government banned it 😭😭 even universities are barred from using it

[–] yet_another_commie@lemmygrad.ml 16 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Funny reading westoid commenters here bashing China for being "authoritarian" when it literally open sourced a groundbreaking innovation a month ago. Washingtobot crackers

[–] CapillaryUpgrade@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Why does that exclude the Chinese government from being authoritarian?

[–] yet_another_commie@lemmygrad.ml 5 points 1 month ago (6 children)

China is authoritarian just like every other state in the world. Except that it's also a whole-process people's democracy unlike the W🤮st

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] stsquad@lemmy.ml 28 points 1 month ago

FLOSS projects can only be sustainable if their are enough shared interests able to support it through contributions of all kinds. Fortunately the code is free so that constellation of support can change over time. It's a shame this particular line of government funding is coming to an end but others can help.

[–] Zoop@beehaw.org 20 points 1 month ago

I really appreciate that there's a text version for those of us who can't or won't use videos! Thank you so much for sharing it, too. 💙

[–] pastermil@sh.itjust.works 103 points 1 month ago (2 children)

EFF should GTFOutta US and set up shop in a safer region.

[–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 month ago

I was going to suggest Canada or Greenland...

[–] NOPper@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 1 month ago

We need them here now more then ever unfortunately. But yeah, stay safe and spread out for sure.

They're the only thing I wear tee shirts for, have stickers all over my gear, and talk about way too often. Underappreciated champions of the people and nobody outside of these kinds of circles knows who the hell they are.

[–] novacomets@lemmy.myserv.one 6 points 1 month ago (2 children)

That would be good for government to cut funding. Users should give away their own cash to support the projects.

Funders of any project can influence decisions, but users giving from their own personal money can keep open source software free from any influences.

[–] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 18 points 1 month ago (2 children)

One of the expressed reasons for cutting funding to PBS and NPR (via the Corp. for Public Broadcasting) is because they can’t influence what is being said by those entities.

[–] EisFrei@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

One cannot influence what no longer exists. *tapsforehead

[–] Kualdir@feddit.nl 82 points 1 month ago

But sadly in reality it means these projects will most likely go underfunded

load more comments