this post was submitted on 22 Jun 2025
170 points (92.5% liked)

Asklemmy

48986 readers
632 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 3) 47 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 days ago

We're leaving the east coast? I think they deserve a path too

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

The first step is refering to yourself as a member of your state and not an American I guess

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Colorado would be Switzerland of North America, but with concussed weed smoking ski bums instead of billionaire globalist

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 days ago

trumpistan leaves, enters techbronia.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago (2 children)

I’d much rather California split into 12 different states, each with roughly the population of Nevada.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Texas technically has always had plans on the books to split into 5 states and there was a time when a part of Tennessee wanted to become its own state called Franklin.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

What’s been stopping them?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I feel like the US would take over California again if that was the case. It's why they like to split up their enemies, to make them easier to control (Korea, China, all the gulf states and parts of the Ottoman Empire, Yugoslavia, etc.).

My personal view is yes, California should leave. I feel like California has the best chance of turning into some sort of Democratic Socialist state without the rest of the US holding it back, and it's big and rich enough it could possibly actually defend it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

A big part of the reason that Republicans are more able to pass legislation is that smaller states have a larger impact than they should, based on their populations.

Each state has a number of members in the House of Representatives in proportion to their population - 52 for California. Each state has two members in the Senate, so CA has the same amount of power in the Senate as Wyoming, which has a population of under 600k to CA’s 39 million.

Beyond the impact on Congress, the sum of those counts determines the number of electoral votes a state has in presidential elections. So California has 54 electoral college votes.

If California split up into 12 different states, each would end up with 6 electoral votes. The total count in the House would decrease from 52 to 48, and some other state would get the remaining 4 (though even that could be avoided by just having some sub-states be large enough to get 5 Representatives) but the total count of Senators would increase from 2 to 24 and the total electoral vote count would increase from 54 to 72.

Many of the smallest US states are firmly red, which means Republicans don’t need as much popular support to make policy changes. This would help reverse that. Heck, if California went all the way and split into 65 states, each with the population of Wyoming, they’d end up with 195 electoral college votes.

I feel like the US would take over California again if that was the case.

I’m not sure how you think the US would take over CA again, or what the impact would be, if it continued to be part of the US and just split into several different states. Could you elaborate?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Only if there's a legal way to do it, which is at this point, a constitutional amendment. The civil war made it clear secession is not an option.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago

If we could do it in a peaceful and democratic way that doesn’t lead to an immediate second civil war, yeah, I’d probably vote for it. It seems to have worked out well enough for Czechia and Slovakia.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 4 days ago

Anything that hastens the death of the U.S. is good by me.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago

Yeah. Horse nomads for Pritzker

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago

I'm cool wit dat

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 days ago

While many of my family members have served in the past and do now, the US is not the end all, be all.

I pledge allegiance to a country without borders, Without Politicians

[–] [email protected] 13 points 4 days ago

I live in Oregon, I'd prefer it if Oregon joined Canada as a province, or like Washington and Oregon together. I don't think it's realistic. There's a lot of unanswered questions of how things would work but I have daydreamed about it.

[–] [email protected] 60 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Californian here, bye Felicia. I'm fucking done with my hard earned money going towards ungrateful backwoods idiots that actively hate me, my state, and my neighbors because they're told to by thuh teevee, yet don't realize it. I'm done subsiding hatred for the sake of it, because "it's the right thing to do." I'm done being at the political whim of people that can't spell potato. I have a lot of heart for my countrymen, but considering far too many of them hate us for reasons they don't even understand, I don't see the point anymore.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 days ago (5 children)

I just hope they automatically give former residents citizenship. I'm stranded out in the badlands for now.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

If honestly be curious how that would work out. CA tends to know the value of immigration, and i couldn't really see them holding a policy of closed borders, at least not in the long run.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 4 days ago (2 children)

California could pull this off, given its industry, agriculture, and Pacific seaports. New York, where I live, has lost too much industry and agriculture to be self-sufficient. Joining Canada, though, could help assuage some of those deficits.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 days ago (3 children)

There's one big fatal flaw to that though. Water. California doesn't have enough.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 days ago

Eh, California is mostly water independent. Most of the water that is “imported” comes from the Colorado River and is used for the least productive and least necessary agriculture in the state. Yeah, figuring out how to handle however much water would be lost if California were to secede would be an issue, but it wouldn’t be an impossible situation.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 days ago

It really does come down to this. They would be outright screwed.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

New York has quite a bit going for it. I think we can stand up for ourselves. I think Jersey, Connecticut, and Vermont would join us right out of the gate. I'd certainly support secession.

Additionally, NY plus CA seceding would put way too much pressure on the remainder for the rest of the states to manage the federal government. If Texas secedes for the opposite reasons, that's the end of it.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago

I speak for all NJ and say "sure fuck it let's go ny" and then I get into the concerns of "who is now in control of the port authority"

We have a lot of fucking idiots though

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Personally, absolutely. California subsidizes so many of the red states in this country, and it sucks, because we don’t get the representation we should. We have 10% of the population, but only get 2% of the representation in the Senate.

That being said, I am completely aware that this is Putin’s goal, and that is why there is a lot of discussion online from Russian bot accounts about this.

It sucks when your goals align with Putin’s, because he is such a monster.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 days ago

I am not a bot, not a Russian asset.

I think.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 4 days ago (2 children)

I'm at the point where I think we should peacefully dissolve the Union entirely. Just grant all 50 states full independence. Let the states come back together in whatever new nation or combination of nations they want.

Look at the current state of our politics. Step back and really look at it. Every political system relies ultimately not on a constitution, but on the good faith of the people actually governing. Look at how the current president is wiping his ass with every check and balance built into the system. Words and laws don't matter, there's always a bad faith interpretation that can allow the president to seize more and more power. And the Supreme Court is openly giving broad sweeping authority to Republican presidents while severely curtailing the power of Democratic presidents. Bribery is legal, and both parties are completely captured by the wealthy. Oh, and every last scrap of freedom, privacy, and autonomy are being torn down in the path of an ever-expanding surveillance panopticon.

I'm sorry. But by the time your political culture decays so far to allow this level of dysfunction, there's no saving it. Our constitution is a woefully out-of-date obsolete document that should have been scrapped generations ago. And it was made difficult to amend by people who had no idea how important amending it would later be. It was built for the compromises of the 1780s, not the compromises of the 2020s. We need to go through a new process of Constitution creation, potentially multiple such processes, and come back together based on new compromises that reflect the reality of the 21st century.

This nation cannot be saved. We need a peaceful national divorce. The alternative is likely something far worse, as we hurdle inexorably towards a second civil war.

Note: obviously there are practical difficulties with dissolving a nation. When this comes up, people love to hand wring about the national debt or how military assets will be dissolved in this kind of scenario. These are important but obvious concerns. But national myopia blinds us here. Nations have peacefully divided countless times through history. These matters are always handled through some negotiation process. American exceptionalism blinds us to our possible futures, simply because we are unwilling to look beyond our own borders for inspiration.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

I think the only reason states have not truly waged war on each other is that we are part of a union. That's just my opinion, but many states would simply begin to fail without the feds redistributing wages from states that have good industry and gdp.

Once they don't get, they will start to try to take, and that fire would spread faster than it could be put out. Again all imo. But us Americans are "a bit shit" to eachother already, to borrow a British phrase.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 days ago

I actually read this, unusual for me. I appreciate your take, and while your reasons are real concerns, I'm not in agreement with your solution.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

No, because it would lead to civil war. Do I wish it could happen? Yes. But is it realistic? No.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Ah, but Trump does not have the balls, brains, or moral integrity of Abraham Lincoln.

So, we got that going for us.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

He doesn't need to imo, these things have plenty of inertia right now. It wouldn't take a lot to get Americans fighting even harder against eachother than we are now even.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago

Not "fighting against each other"...just "trying to repel a Nazi invasion".

[–] [email protected] 28 points 4 days ago

I don't think the population is as hopelessly divided as the social media spaces make it out to be, but at the same time, the federal government looks more and more unrecoverable from corporate interests and back to the people every single day. It's probably past the point of return, excepting major societal shakeup.

It feels like there may come a point where the states that are large enough to be countries on their own start looking into any mechanisms that would allow them separation, just to be able to run themselves without federal interference and incompetence.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 days ago

Only as a last resort and everything else has been tried.

[–] [email protected] 37 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (4 children)

This throws under the bus the many many non republicans in places gerrymandered such that the minority can continue it's rule. My life would probably get better, but only at their expense as more and more solvent states leave the union. I'm not willing to 'punish' those people for the crime of being born in a impossibly corrupt district.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Gotta break a few eggs, etc.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 4 days ago (4 children)

Why did democrats not stop the gerrymandering? Why are there so many laws that should not exist still there?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Because democrats have found a way to benefit from their own misuses of the law as well, so you can see how this leaves the people trying to change this with impossible choices they have to suffer consequences of even if they make the best one. It takes a lot of fight to stand up and keep pushing through that, and those are exactly the folk I'm proud to call my country-kin

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Democrats do gerrymandering too. Basically without gerrymandering, the power would shift about 4% in Democrats favor. Enough to shift power in the House, but not as much as people think.

(That statistic comes from a video I watched a while ago, and could be wrong, so take it with a grain of salt. I’m not an authority on this matter.)

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago

I suspect politics would actually shift a huge minority amount towards "no, don't kill the planet, my grandchildren live here".

The billionaire planet killers can afford to buy up and lock down two parties. I doubt they can afford to buy out everyone.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 4 days ago

And that outdated electoral college, smells like the fourth republic in france IMO.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 days ago

Fuck it why not. This country is proving to be a global liability due to its structure, size, and lack of codified protections for its own handling.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›