this post was submitted on 30 Mar 2025
305 points (99.4% liked)

politics

22571 readers
4084 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 days ago

Why doesn't Greenland/Denmark disallow them from even having a base there anymore?

[–] [email protected] 25 points 2 days ago

What is that minimizing title? He's talking about an invasion of conquest. Call it that.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

since these guys don't understand opsec I think I'm safe to assume they don't understand surface area either

[–] [email protected] 74 points 2 days ago (1 children)

A few people I work with are huge Trump fans and with the news of taking over Greenland they are fully onboard with it and have been trying to find racial slurs for Greenland people. These people are mentally unstable and need to be removed from society.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Look a lot of people online talk big game about how people should dump their partners or file labor abuses/lawsuits, etc. without any concept of what these things actually require from people. Chest pounding usually.

However, if you actually have colleagues who are actively trying to drop slurs at work, you need to report that shit immediately.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Agreed! Most if not everyone I’m working with is all talk and no action. For the most part I just quietly listen and laugh to myself. Let them have their own awareness of the situation when it’s far too late. Although I highly doubt they will ever become aware of how bad things are in this country.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Totally get the sentiment but you might have colleagues who are more deeply effected

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I definitely believe that most are affected with something.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago
[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Shun people like this, and if possible, quietly sabotage them.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

No point in going all cloak and dagger about it. Just go straight to HR and report them. Make them decide if they want that liability. Let them ruin their own lives.

This isn’t about revenge, this is about not having to work in a hostile work environment. This is about you and your sane colleagues not having to put up with this shit on top of the shit you have to deal with at work. I have zero tolerance for this kind of stuff. somebody says something fucked up at work, they usually get one polite warning from me that I don’t wanna hear it again. After that I let HR or upper level management deal with it.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Not every workplace has HR. And in many cases, the offender may be your superior.

Cloak and dagger.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

HR or upper management

You always have a boss. If not, then you’re the person who has to deal with this directly. They never said it was a superior, so we should operate under the assumption they aren’t reporting to this person.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Any American forces attacking Greenland are committing war crimes. If they listen to trump and go ahead with an attack the American military leaders of any rank will be guilty of war crimes. Let's see how many generals and admirals are willing to quit sucking trump's asshole and abide by the law.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago

That wouldn’t be the first time.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

guilty of war crimes

And just who would try them for it?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

The Revolutionary Committee

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 days ago

checks history notes

[–] [email protected] 30 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Trump will encounter a home-grown resistance in the US if he wages war on NATO. It will start a civil war. MMW

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

good thing the police have been militarizing for decades.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago

The problem is that invoking the term "civil war" for the US calls on a historical image of two clear sides, or perhaps the very vague handwaving history of the recent movie of the same name. There might finally be some sort of civil unrest against the government in some ways, but it won't be a Blue vs. Grey organized movement. More a fall into chaos where some places will go on as usual, while others might be a war zone type scenario caused by official lashing out at public actions. It's unprecedented, like most of recent events, and unusual because of the size and makeup of the US itself. It won't be like any other civil war.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I'd love to believe that but I find no evidence to support it

load more comments
view more: next ›