Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
I am not seeing the fact that they had one week expiration on the messages or that not archiving these communications is illegal. Shady people doing shady things.
It's all in the 2025 play book.
Just look there for any potential illegal activity and they will likely be doing it.
These people think rules are there just for show. They think they can do no wrong as long as they obey dear leader. It doesn't matter to them that with the amount of power they weild one mistake could cost human lives.
They don't deserve power. No one in this administration does. Trump hasn't even accidentally done something right this entire administration. It's like if he were walking in the rain and he purposely jumps in every puddle he sees.
He should be calling for an investigation into bombing Yemen.
They'll be wiping fascist cum off their chin again by the end of the week
I demand consequences
Honestly if you're anybody in the government with this bozo, just assume you're already going to get compromised.
Tensions within the GOP are growing, with hawkish Republicans supporting Waltz and Trump loyalists opposing him.
What does break rank mean in this context out of curiosity?
The term “rank and file” refers to an army marching in a grid. Breaking rank is leaving the group.
So like legitimately swapping parties or just like performatively being ashamed of their party temporarily?
The second one lol
Given the Republican and now MAGA propensity to march in lock step, any break in the ranks is noteworthy.
Doing the bare minimum. A security incident happened. Make a report on how and suggest ways to resolve / prevent it.
No further consequences required.
I hope I'm wrong, but my money is on most of them deciding early that there shouldn't be any punishments handed out. Susan Collins will swerve a bit with her answer to appear as a holdout, until she ends up towing the party line again, stating that they've "learned their lesson".
It's going to be a lot of "concerned" comments from both the senate and the house, but nobody is willing to put their votes where their mouth is.
Definitely an accurate prediction for Collins - she already called in sick so she didn’t have to attend the hearings.
Hawkish Republicans are standing WITH Waltz? Shouldn’t they be calling for a court martial, since he flagrantly violated long-established military codes of conduct?
I was one of the American military who had access to classified information. I knew better than this. I've worked with enlisted members as young as 19 or 20 years old who knew better than this. When the head of the DoD, the National Security Advisor, Director of the CIA, the Vice President, and the Director of National Intelligence do this, it's not because they don't know better. It's because they're trying to hide their communications in violation of the Presidential Records Act, and they know full well what they're doing is wrong. ETA: And they also compromised a military operation putting the lives of American soldiers at risk, which would land me or any of my enlisted colleagues in Fort Leavenworth for an extended stay, so there's that.
I'd love to know what the American military thinks of all this. I'm sure there's a lot of pro Trump in the military, but you'd think brazen violations of opsec should leave you worried about who's putting your lives at risk...
prior service here. it's disgusting. it's infuriating that the president fucked off to mar-a-fucko with nuclear secrets. it's revolting that this current junta of incompetents seems to be hellbent on running the country off the cliff.
there's some pro trump people, but the vast majority just want their benefits and a better job than arby's.
Not all of us are fascists, and not all joined because we wanted to blow up brown people. I wanted to be an engineer but couldn't afford college when I was 17, and was offered a pretty good salary with benefits out the gate, plus the opportunity to have my degree paid for. Even during the Iraq invasion when i joined, I had no interest in actually doing anything related to warfare.
But a lot of the guys I work with, whether they've always been like that from the start, because they think it's funny, or because they're willfully ignorant, don't think the same way. There's also huge disparities between thoughts in the branches as a whole, as well as intellectual stratification in the branches. For example, it's a lot more likely that you'll find fascist ideals in the Army and Marines than the Air Force and Navy, but you'll still find free thinkers in the more educated parts of the "fighting" branches and idiots in the ones focused on tech. The smart ones are worried, the dumbasses think it's lulz.
I do find it funny (in a sad, sad way), though, that a lot of the people who have been openly supportive of the Fascists' policies in the past now say things like "I don't really pay attention to politics lol" or claim/admit that they don't vote. Now that it's clear that their ineptitude has led us to a place where the country's soft power is nil, the benefits every servicemember enjoys are at risk, and they're probably going to go up against China within the next couple of years, they're suddenly not as vocal about their position. I can't wait to retire and put this all behind me so I can focus on more important things. One more year and I'm done.
All that said, politicians really like to prop the military up as a huge, monolithic entity that always thinks, acts, and votes identically (and conservative to boot), and this simply isn't true. Anyone smart enough to think past "brown people bad/MURICA FUCK YEAH" realizes that the military benefits program is the most successful socialist movement America has ever had.
I have to go to work so I need to cut it off here, but that's the start of my rant. Thank you for attending my TedTalk.
Legal disclaimer: I do not speak for the military, the government, or anyone working in either. There's your disclaimer, Whiskey Pete. I'm compliant with the words on your DODI now.
Sorry, but it doesn't matter one. single. bit. that the US military "isn't a monolithic entity" if, when it comes down to it, they act like a monolithic entity and follow corrupt, unlawful, and treasonous orders like how the USAF has been wordlessly transporting kidnapped legal residents and greencard holders to foreign countries without any semblance of legal process or even a criminal act done.
US military personnel love saying "we don't follow unlawful orders" who have never had to make that decision until they are given an illegal order and they follow it. Just see every war that the US (and most other nations to be honest) had ever fought and what is currently going on.
It is the exact same as the argument of ACAB. If there are 50 "good" people who actively shield, enable, and do nothing about 50 "bad" people doing horrible, illegal, and/or immoral things, you have 100 bad people.
I respect your opinion and agree on many points, and in many cases. I will contend with your argument that the military acts monolithically and wordlessly executes illegal orders, however, particularly because in its wording you apply a blanket onto 3 million people while failing to acknowledge the counter.
The military in the US is beholden to not only the Constitution and the laws of the country, but also the UCMJ, under which we are explicitly and implicitly prohibited from taking part in any partisanism or taking any action which would even imply that the military and Executive are at odds. We can argue the necessity and limits of that policy but that's not the point here. The news will readily report on the sensational--"Navy Sailor arrested at protest," "Soldier participated in attempted coup on January 6th," but they can't get clicks from "NJP article 134," "Sentenced to Leavenworth 6 years following trial and holding in brig."
Neither one of us knows what orders those pilots received. If they were directed to, and chose to, execute an order they knew to be unlawful, they absolutely deserve to be investigated, tried, and sentenced. Is that more than the victims of this atrocious act were allowed? Yes, but two fascist acts don't cancel each other out. I can't stress the point enough that this should never have happened, and we should be doing what we can to rectify it, but retribution is not justice.
But if they were lied to, told to fly from one airport to another per today's schedule, and their listed cargo was just "personnel, materiel," it's not reasonable to lay blame on them like that. Likewise, it's illegal for them to talk about what happened to anyone outside need-to-know unless it's released in court, so we'll probably never hear what actually went down.
Have people executed unlawful orders? Yes. Have they been absolved of responsibility? Sometimes, yes. Should they be held accountable to their level of responsibility, and are they? Typically, yes. That's the biggest difference between police forces and the military, and my other point of contention with your argument.
I agree that when a Nazi sits at a table with nine people who don't tell him to leave, you just have ten Nazis. But whereas the police will band around the Nazi to protect him because he wears the same color clothes, the military will eventually jail the Nazis when they're found guilty of crimes. It's just past the sensationalized news cycle so you have to look for it rather than being presented.
So then it comes down to whether enough military personnel will have the morals to stand up to fascist orders from the executive branch and disobey them, displaying that they are at odds, or if they will simply obey unlawful, fascist orders to not get prosecuted under the UCMJ.
Also, I would be extremely hesitant to believe that the host of pilots, mechanics, MPs, and logistics did not notice at all women and children being dragged in chains, likely crying, and if on-video behavior is anything to go by, also likely being harassed by ICE handlers and thought there was nothing wrong enough to bring it up to their COs. Cargo is quickly inspected at the very least. And the fact that they didn't have any prior clearance to land at the airport they were going to... They aren't complete idiots...
Sorry, but these things do not happen quietly. That is like saying the train drivers and the people loading them into the cars carrying the Jews only knew they were carrying "personnel, material" and happened to be going to "a labor camp".
... will have the morals to stand up to fascist orders from the executive branch and disobey them, displaying that they are at odds, or if they will simply obey unlawful, fascist orders to not get prosecuted under the UCMJ.
Obeying unlawful fascist orders will get you court-martialed, not avoid it. Not obeying them might have you scrubbing latrines for six months, getting a punishment from your CO, but obeying them will end in prison time. This precedent was set at the Nuremberg Trials and this is the reason every soldier is drilled with the knowledge that you are not encouraged, you are obligated, to ignore unlawful orders because the law WILL NOT have your back for performing them.
One story about this for you. MI during the first Trump presidency. There was much said in my office when he tweeted top secret satellite imagery in 2019. My chief went around the shop after this and sat with everybody, and made sure they knew what happened, how this leak got an Intel source burned, how much time/money/effort was wasted from that burned source, how much harder it will be for us to keep the boots-on-ground out there safe, etc.
The tone of the workplace was set after that: "We are here to do our job and keep the guys in the field from getting killed. Our leaders have, and will continue, to make that mission difficult."
This is NOT good! For the people Breaking with Trump! Who CARES if our Military Leaders BLATANTLY put American Soldiers and Civilians in Harms Way? Trump said it was OK and TRUMP is ALWAYS Right! I'm NOT in a Cult and I LOVE America!
I see right through you and your correct spelling. Lol
As they should. This is a colossal fuck up. Multiple people should be fired
Out of a cannon and into the sun?
They should go to fucking prison.
Starting with Stephen fucken Miller.
Kapo Stephen "PeeWee Himmler" Miller
Best we can do is paid suspensions for life lol
Fired is the least that should happen. Several federal laws were blatantly, very obviously, violated. They should be sitting in a prison awaiting hearing, then sentenced to 15 years. This is worse than what Jack Texeira did.
Fired!? Heavens no, multiple people should be in jail. but best we can do is pardons and maybe a raise.