this post was submitted on 26 Mar 2025
1970 points (97.4% liked)

Microblog Memes

7673 readers
2814 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Credit: u/manchesterMan0098

(page 4) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MTK@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 68 points 1 month ago (7 children)

Women: "I want a guy in touch with his feelings."

Men: "I want a woman I can share my feelings with."

Internet people: "Women aren't your mommy, go see a therapist with your dumb feelings."

Me, too moron to interact with human: "Hello kitty, wanna watch King Of the Hill again? Me too, I'll get the blanket."

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 38 points 1 month ago (6 children)

As a guy, when I was younger, I jumped from relationship to relationship looking for that exact thing. You know what I got for my trouble? Nothing.

So, during my college years, I spent time by myself, learning how to get by and be okay with surviving without relying on anyone else. It was a farce of course because I was in school, not going to work, but it was close enough.

I got into the workforce and all of the things I forced myself to learn to be independent from literally everyone, was the pivot point where I was able to stabilize my life and start dating.

After a while I knew I didn't want someone who needed me. I wanted someone who 100% could do everything that they needed to do on their own, but wanted me around anyways.

I found what I was looking for. I put a ring on it.

I don't worry when she goes out in her vehicle that she bought with her own money for her own purposes, that she's going to go find someone "better" because neither of us care about what's "better" than whatever else. I don't have to worry that she'll call and say she needs money because x, y, or z. She has her own money she made, that she can spend however she wants.

We split household costs, we enjoy eachother company and we value that we aren't relied on by the other for everything. It goes both ways.

As things have gone, the line between "mine" and "hers" has blurred to the point that, unless it's a high dollar value item, it's just ours. Because bothering to remember who paid for what is a waste of time and effort. Cars, yes, anything else? Probably not.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] ShotDonkey@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

Men need friends, not bros.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 26 points 1 month ago

We all need a caring person to nurture and restore our energy. This is a fundamental part of loving someone. Your parents do it when you're young but that does not mean you stop needing it.

Both of these posters are toxic in different ways.

[–] Iceman@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I don't think therapy is a particularly good substitute for having loved ones you can be intimate with. Nor is relationships necessarily tools for learning to deal with every dysfunction that one could have.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] barsoap@lemm.ee 24 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Going from "men need intimacy" to "manchild wants a mommy" is toxic masculinity on the second guy's part.

[–] Zorque@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

What about only reading the last part of the description instead of the whole thing to make a snap judgment? Is that toxic masculinity? Or is it just reframing it for your own ends, which is gender neutral?

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 6 points 1 month ago

So what was that because you just went off on someone who made a valid point.

Why don't we all have a bit of nuance here? Wanting to be in a loving relationship doesn't mean you need therapy. Obviously.

Some people don't need to be in therapy and some people do need to be in therapy and the people who do need to be in therapy should be in therapy regardless of their gender. Making overly broad statements like pretty much both of these two are doing is entirely unhelpful.

What is also unhelpful is being rude and snarky.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Allonzee@lemmy.world 25 points 1 month ago (4 children)

If you dont want to both provide and receive caring, nurturing, and intimacy, as needed in a relationship, stay single.

That is the entire point. "to have and to hold" isn't a nearly universal marriage vow for nothing, even if it's a lie when said by many of either sex.

Sadly, as with virtually everything in society, relationships and marriage after a lovely but brief enlightened period are regressing back to a transactional business arrangement and not something based in mutual love, warts and all. Sucks to suck.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 7 points 1 month ago

Sadly, as with virtually everything in society, relationships and marriage after a lovely but brief enlightened period are regressing back to a transactional business arrangement and not something based in mutual love, warts and all. Sucks to suck.

There definitely seems to be this feeling online that everyone has that everything is now terrible and everything was wonderful and roses in the past. But that simply is not true. It isn't worse now than it was 20 years ago, and it's a lot better now than it was 50 years ago. I really do not understand why people seem to go around believing everything is falling apart.

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Hasn’t marriage been a business affair for much of history?

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago

Varried by region culture and era but yeah at the bare minimum it was true for the upper classes and merchants. Farmers, Craftsmen, and Mariners seem to have generally married for social reason be it friendship or love.

[–] Allonzee@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I literally said it's regressing back to that after an enlightened period.

[–] PotentialProblem@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Eh…. Of all the people I know in relationships, none of them are transactional like you’re saying and they all want to be supported. So, unless my area of the world is different, this may just be a vocal minority that you’re running into online.

[–] Allonzee@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I'm married myself, but have noticed a fairly recent "reality" dating television proclivity rotting my significant other's brain with regards to this.

I'm concerned for her because she never used to be into such drivel and it is changing her opinions on the dynamics of marital life. Those shows are the gospel of making relationships about material gain and tit for tat.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] echodot@feddit.uk 3 points 1 month ago

If anything that kind of transactional relationship is less likely now then in the past since divorce is now more socially acceptable.

load more comments (1 replies)

Men need a loving relationship and therapy.

load more comments