_portrait.jpg){kind=link}
What a fucking idiot
this post was submitted on 25 Mar 2025
111 points (99.1% liked)
Leopards Ate My Face
6120 readers
1431 users here now
Rules:
- If you don't already have some understanding of what this is, try reading this post. Off-topic posts will be removed.
- Please use a high-quality source to explain why your post fits if you think it might not be common knowledge and isn't explained within the post itself.
- Links to articles should be high-quality sources – for example, not the Daily Mail, the New York Post, Newsweek, etc. For a rough idea, check out this list. If it's marked in red, it probably isn't allowed; if it's yellow, exercise caution.
- The mods are fallible; if you've been banned or had a comment removed, you're encouraged to appeal it.
- For accessibility reasons, an image of text must either have alt text or a transcription in the comments.
- All Lemmy.World Terms of Service apply.
Also feel free to check out [email protected] (also active).
Icon credit C. Brück on Wikimedia Commons.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Segregation academies, here we come (again)!
Huh, oddly enough towards the end of the article it states that this guy is actually working to limit the number "vouchers" for charter schools in Tennessee expressly to preserve funding for public education.
"I'm in favor of reducing the Department of Education on the federal level," Warner said. "I would love to see President Trump send more money back to the states. I'm good with that, but I don't want to see that go to the private sector. I want to see it help our public schools."
I'm confused by this statement. What does "send more money back to the states" mean? Does the US have federal schools or something? Isn't the federal government paying for state run schools already sending money back to the states?
I'm going to try to give him the benefit of the doubt. (Although I think the answer of 'he doesn't know what he's talking about' is probably accurate)
He may mean that X amount of money goes to the DOE, but only Y goes to the schools. From what I understand, they think that eliminating the staff of the DOE will bring Y closer to X, since they won't have to pay those people anymore. By dumping the responsibilities on to other depts, they can keep paying those people the same to do more work, and the total cost of business will go down.
You’re not confused, the quoted person just doesn’t know how anything works. They’re a Republican voter, after all
They’re a Republican voter, after all
The quote is from Tennessee State House Rep. Todd Warner, though I'm sure they do vote Republican.
Thanks for keeping me honest; that’s what I get for not checking the source of the quote