this post was submitted on 23 Mar 2025
171 points (76.1% liked)

Technology

67669 readers
5629 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The title is err, not correct because the top 2 alternatives Opera and Arc are based on Chromium engine. I have seen tons of people swear by Arc, but I am seriously asking (since as a Linux user I can't use it), how much good can a browser be in this day and age if ultimately it's ad blocking breaks and it will since Manifest v2 will go soon(unless Arc folks have a solution for it)

The rest alternatives are Firefox, Zen (FF fork but honestly Atleast this was something new I learned from this article) and Tor (which is weird since it is not meant for normal web browsing and using it will not only be slow but put additional strain on the nodes, correct me if I am wrong).

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Its actually pretty important that some normal traffic does flow through tor. If you dont mind the speed then its perfectly okay* to do all your web browsing through tor

*there are some caveats here but its not about the network really

[–] [email protected] 12 points 4 days ago

Firefox
Firefox
Firefox
Firefox derivatives
...

[–] [email protected] 46 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Great opportunity to mention Brave is owned by a dipshit right-wing homophobe.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 days ago

Always has been.

Right beside the fact that their monetary model relies on user activity tracking. Yet they advertise privacy.

A browser that had a seemingly unlimited budget for advertising before it even had users is suspicious as hell.

I've never trusted brave.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 4 days ago (1 children)

And funded by a right-wing billionaire who owns the largest corporate intelligence agency on the planet. Your data is not safe with Brave.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Except your data not being safe with Brave doesn't depend on who owns it. It's a technical conclusion that should follow from technical traits of a system. Those are such that using a modern web browser to do modern web things is not secure period.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago

You identify as a liberal politically, don't you?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 days ago (2 children)

I didn't see Waterfox mentioned in the article or comments, so I'm giving it a shout out now. Firefox is still my #1 browser, which I have synced to all my critical accounts, and use very cautiously, only using a few trustwothy extensions. However, when I want to explore unfamiliar domains or experiment with lesser-known browser extensions, I've relied on the equally dependable Waterfox browser. It's fast, free, and 99% the same as Firefox except it's a completely different app so you can basically have 2 Firefoxes set up and customized for completely different roles. Between the two, I can keep Chrome frozen on my phone and off my desktop (although I have a portable Chromium on USB for emergencies).

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 days ago (1 children)

You do know Firefox has profiles you can use to effectively make it two (or more) separate browsers?

Not shitting on Waterfox, just FYI.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

I do, and have used them in the past. However I've had issues with the profiles getting corrupted. Could be user error ;) Installing Waterfox was easier than trying to sort out my profiles.ini and so as you know, nothing is more permanent than a temporary fix :D

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago

I have Waterfox setup as an alternative browser but it does not have much stuff to differentiate itself from mainstream FF, as you said.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Of that list, Zen is the only one really worth considering. And then you have the “but the best one that supports widevine” issue.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 4 days ago

Zen is also being developed by an asshole who doesn't even understand the code he's working on, by his own admission. I wonder if he's fixed the backdoor he added to it yet.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Firefox is still great, and Tor Browser is fantastic.

I'm personally checking out Mullvad Browser.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Tor is good for onion sites, but do people use it for general web browsing? Wouldn't it be super slow?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Yes, and you should too because more "natural" traffic helps protect people who need it (journalists, political dissidents, etc). For mostly text content, it's fine.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Sure, if you want to wait 3 minutes for your all-text site to load.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago

It's not that bad, it's a handful of seconds.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago

Yes basically unusable in my experience.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

Eww opera, at least it's slightly better than opera gx

Edit: TOR? I stopped treating this guy seriously once I read this. Nobody uses TOR for regular browsing. They're full of shit.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I tried Opera GX because it advertised the ability limit RAM consumption, and then I found out that the lowest it could go was 1GB which was not as low as I wanted.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 4 days ago

Some bullshit. If you want to lower raw then just close out your tabs

load more comments
view more: next ›