This time, he's bringing a Black Lotus, Blue Eyes White Dragon, Uno Reverse card, AND Topsun Charizard Blue Back Card.
What fucking cards do you have, Donny?
this post was submitted on 19 Mar 2025
78 points (100.0% liked)
politics
22015 readers
3843 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
"Zelenskyy misunderstood the conditions of the ceasefire. You see, the US and Russia agreed that Ukraine would no longer launch attacks against Russia. We didn't say anything about the other way around. Ukraine needs to start understanding the terms of the ceasefire we're agreeing to on their behalf if they want to show they're serious about ending a war they started."
-- JD Vance, probably.
Get him by the ego. Let Trump know that this is clear evidence that Putin doesn't respect him.
Heh, maybe it will work, but from what I remember, the disaster on that disaster meeting started when Zelenskyy said that putin doesn't honor any agreement.
Another thing is that given how quickly he stopped delivery of ammunition, means this was planned since the transition, so the spectacle was purposefully done.
There's a small chance that this time could be seen as different as Putin broke a "deal" with Trump.
Putin breaking agreements with other people, ok, but Trump considers himself different and those don't count.
Having Trump be directly involved in a broken deal might be enough of an affront to bother Trump.
Long shot, more likely Putin rationalizes it away to Trump somehow
I was hopeful during transition and until Gabbard was sworn in. That's when he showed his true intentions.
Biden set him so well, that he could be remembered as the person that dissolved Russia and have statues built in Ukraine of himself, but he still went with Russia.
Though I would love to be proven wrong.
Moscow has been very friendly to him consistently since the 80s. All flattery and benefit, with zero demanded of him.
Ukraine is that country that declined to make up stuff about Biden in an incident that blew up into his first impeachment.
So I didn't have high hopes
Sounds like an incredible waste of time to me, but I guess as the leader of a country he has to do something.
Not at all... Last time he came to the white house, the world watched. The EU (defense council?) met with him as soon as he flew back, and pledged like 1.5 trillion to fund defense spending, and plans to put boots on the ground moved forward
Now he's going to come back, show he's devoted to peace, and Trump is probably going to ambush him again - demonstrating again that the US is not a reliable ally and drumming up more support