513
🐆🍽️ 🎭
this post was submitted on 18 Jun 2025
513 points (97.1% liked)
politics
24378 readers
6285 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
We ALL told you not to vote for her you spineless loser.
It's simple - no Democrat should cast a single yes vote for ANY MAGA legislation, ever.
I can’t even read this shit anymore. I’m almost more furious with the Democrats than the republicans at this point. Every single nominee should have been a knock-down, drag-out fight. We’d be better off with an empty cabinet than the array of lickspittles and lunatics in there now.
It’s really bad when Tulsi Gabbard is one of the only trustworthy people in the administration.
load more comments
(4 replies)
How many times do we have to teach you this lesson, old man?
If ONLY there was SOME Sort of Way they could have KNOWN that a Dog Killing Lunatic Governor would be a BAD Choice! Oh NO! MAYBE if you Donate some they'll THINK really Hard next time a Lunatic Dog Killer is Nominated!
Saw post title and thought surely this was “leaopardsatemyface”
Get primaried.
I swear, this country has one party of ‘no regerts’ and one party of ‘in hindsight it was the wrong choice.’ Really great that you see the mistake, but you keep making it.
load more comments
(1 replies)
Why did these idiots vote for her?
Because the Dems are still capitalists, owned by big business donors
Don't ever think that they give a fuck about the people
If they weren't capable of seeing this coming, then they should not be in a position to make these decisions.
Get fucked, you fucking traitors. Sadly the terrorist actually got some of the good ones instead of you corporate goons
No they don't. They did what was best for their reelection fund.
Uh, NO SHIT
TACO had the highest ratio of approved appointees, even though he had the most insane ones.
Talk is cheap. Change your actions if you actually care.
Primary the lot of them.
THEY NEVER SHOULD HAVE VOTED TO CONFIRM HER IN THE FIRST PLACE. OUR OWN PARTY IS FULL OF DUMBASSES.
But mUH dECoRuM1!1
It’s not our party. But it could be after the primaries.
Indeed. Though I'm not sure we could without finding some way to do this without shooting ourselves in the foot at every turn. No politician in any party incumbent or not should go without a primary challenge. But so many are hyper focused on Purity tests that don't accomplish anything.
load more comments
(4 replies)
load more comments
(1 replies)
Americans, pay attention. Both parties are selling you out. This is evidence. Republicans, their approach, while brutal, is refreshingly honest.
Democrats merely pretend they care about you. They don't. They, like the Republicans, only wish to continue playing the game at your expense. If they actually cared about you, Rove v. Wade would have been enshrined as a Constitutional right ages ago, rather than used as a political football.
Time to create REAL alternatives for yourselves.
Primary them by all means but not supporting an alternative against the current gov is supporting the fascist status quo.
Need to support AOC and Bernie to overall that party while the stupid FPTP system exists.
Catch 22. A vote for either party is also a vote for FPTP because neither of them want to get rid of it since they both benefit from it.
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(3 replies)
Everybody that has voted while Trump is president should be voted out. If they voted for any approval or confirmation, fuckin voted out.
They sold out our nation.
load more comments
(1 replies)
Why do we keep electing sellout Democrats who won’t even do their jobs? We haven’t even had a real primary in 17 years.
I'll bite. Because on the whole they vote our positions more than the red team would. Are they a good fit for my politics? Nope, but they're usually the least bad option in the general.
That said we need to primary these fucks every time.
We have a similar problem in Canada. A lot of us wanted to vote NDP but felt we had to vote liberal to avoid the risk of vote splitting leading to a conservative win. This problem could be avoided with ranked choice voting like they have in Australia, which our last prime minister promised to give us but he gave up on it.
To your latter point- if people show up to vote at all they don't usually show up to primaries.
Wish in one hand, shit in the other. See which fills up first. People aren't voting every single election and just hoping someone great shows up. Well newsflash- you gotta show up first.
To your latter point- if people show up to vote at all they don't usually show up to primaries.
And this is the problem right here. You should be voting at least once a year and paying fucking attention to who the candidates are and their platform
load more comments
(7 replies)
Because BNMW amirite?
I really enjoy that you have to put this in code now. Can't openly state it. And still get largely downvoted for it.
It's such a shitty, dishonest take. And people are finally waking up to it. Hindsight has always been 2020. And looking back I think plenty of people right now sorely wish we still had a Democrat in the oval office. Regardless of all the problems that we would still have. We wouldn't have a full-on autocrat on the March in our own country as well. And might actually be able to focus completely on what's going on over in Palestine instead of having to split our resources now on more fronts. Including local.
I'm not defending Or absolving democrats of their part in this. They're still not learning. Just like you're still not learning. And just as much as the Democrats are not an ally of the left or the people in general. Neither is someone like you who actively campaigned against our best interest. Helping to get the worst possible outcome elected. Simply because the other option was not perfect enough.
No yours is the dishonest take. You're defending the rot at the core of the Democratic party, when it's that very rot that prevents them from an easy path to victory in elections, and speeds our progress towards fascism.
MLK was right when he said that the true enemy of progress in this world were those who would ask us to suffer an unjust peace instead of accepting the righteous tension required to bring about change.
We're here because we were told, by people like you, that we needed to accept less from Democrats because the alternative was worse. And we listened, for decades. And as a result both Democrats and their alternative both got worse, to the point that The Democratic party is at its lowest favor ability in almost a hundred years.
So miss me with your anemic, shown to be losing, approach to politics
I'm not defending the rot. I literally called you and them both out. But you've never been honest so why would you start now. We could do a lot more to take care of it if there was a democrat in office right now and we weren't having to struggle to keep Ukraine from being steamrolled and our allies betrayed domestic and foreign. All the families now being ripped apart. Simply because Biden was not good enough for you simply because Harris was not good enough for you. You and your useless Purity tests.
Oh and nice selective quoting of Martin Luther King Jr. there. Don't let yourself think that slipped by. But I'll tell you one thing. While King was correct to call that out. You know what he didn't do. He didn't stop trying to seek alliances where he could to change things when possible. Martin Luther King Jr didn't rely on Purity tests. Not like you. People are right to have a lot of regret. Things weren't perfect. But they were better. And hopefully they will learn from all this purity testing. But letting the perfect be the enemy of the achievable is always a bad position.
I've never told anyone to accept less from the democrats. In fact I regularly tell people to primary them everywhere and Republicans as well. The simple fact is when it comes to national elections like the presidency. It will either be a Republican or a Democrat that wins. And while neither one is good. One is certainly much much worse. As shameful as it was. Palestine wasn't on the ballot in the presidential election. But blatant fascism was. And while Democrats I think did the Lions share to hurt themselves. People with purity test like yours did no service either.
But you do you. Tell yourself what you need to to absolve yourself of any role in the problems we're now facing in america. Build as many straw men as you like. People see you. And they're not liking what they see.
You aren't just defending the rot: you are the rot. And calling me dishonest when you've been in a state of perpetual gaslight for litterally years?
Fucking rich dude.
Litterally all I have done is that advocate that Democrats not use strategies shown to lose elections. Your brain interprets that as advocating against Democrats, and I'm sorry that I can't take a time machine back to your 10th grade home home room teacher that Eldritch the apologist needs to work on their reading comprehension skills. Show me once, where I advocated for people to not vote Democrat in the 2024 election.
Your persistent and nefarious approach to politics, your constant efforts to silence important accurate and relevant criticism of Democrats, advocacy that is trying to get them to do better: Your the fucking problem with the Democrats.
Shielding Biden from criticism during an election cycle threw the election for Democrats. Shielding Harris from criticism when she didn't shift policies from Biden lost the election for Democrats.
Gaslighting people to deny the evidence of their eyes and ears will continue to lose Democrats elections.
Democrats can't win elections using your approach. We ran the experiment. We have the data. You were the fucking problem.
load more comments
(12 replies)
load more comments
(2 replies)
As a minority party with essentially no control of anything your only job is to make the majority's job as hard as possible and they couldn't even do that!
Don't worry, as soon as Trump crosses Schumer's red line of disregarding the supreme court the Democrats will spring into action!
.... They'll spring into action any day now
....... Any day now
Democrats: 🦗🦗🦗
They'll spring into action by waving a finger at him and going tsk tsk
load more comments
(1 replies)
What do you mean? Theyre acting right now to address the wild chaos of the Trump admin and calling their stock brokers as we speak
load more comments
(2 replies)
What the fuck did these useless cunts think would happen?
They passed the buck and hoped some other guardrail would do their job for them
load more comments
(5 replies)
load more comments
(1 replies)
Like RFK Jr no Democrat should have found her qualified from the outset. I’m glad that Kaine is very disappointed with her though. Maybe he’ll self soothe with some finger wagging.
Oh fuck off Democrats.
Too fucking bad.
Your regret is worth no more than any regret expressed by US voters who voted for Chump.
Like those US voters, you knew what you'd get, you were warned, you were told, and you ignored all of that and did it anyway for whatever chickenshit reasons you may have had at the time.
Fuck. Right. Off. Shove your "guilt/regret/whatever" straight up your collective ass.
Fucking tired of Dems "saying the right things" and saying it too late when they can't undo what they did and are simply attempting to rehabilitate their reputation. You have no reputation to rehabilitate, you ultimate performative cowards.
🤦♀️ 🤡 🫏 🖕 💩
load more comments
(1 replies)