this post was submitted on 05 Mar 2025
213 points (99.1% liked)

politics

22015 readers
4021 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

When President Donald Trump announced last week he wanted Congress to “pass a clean, temporary government funding Bill,” that should have dropped the chances of a federal shutdown to near zero.

After all, shutdown threats tend to get driven by conservative hard-liners intent on cutting spending — and who better than Trump to pull them in line and keep the government open?

So it’s quite a testament to how dramatically Trump has shaken up Washington over the past six weeks that the likelihood of a shutdown hasn’t abated. In fact, according to my reporting, it might actually have increased.

This time, it’s Democrats who are itching for a fight — over the Department of Government Efficiency cuts that Trump has blessed and deputized mogul Elon Musk has gleefully carried out.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago

Wet fucking noodles.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Democrats

Serious

I'm sure we'll see a shutdown, but that was still a funny joke

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 weeks ago

How many signs will they hold up this time?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Oh no! They'll send another strongly-worded letter! Better lookout, Trump! Facepalm

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago

Eh a shut down is more than a strongly worded letter at least.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago

Anarchists too. Make sure the police and prisons are all shutdown too. Just keep EMS on payroll.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago

looks oh, it's politico. No thanks.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago
[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 weeks ago

Ha. No they won’t. They scared.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago

This is tone deaf, but I guess after so much yelling from trump, how can anything be heard clearly

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago

How about getting serious about using force if Trump attacks an ally or annexes other countries territory? Draw that fucking line in the sand now before this goes any further.

[–] [email protected] 60 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Are we taking about the same lame ass Democratic leadership that sat down with stupid ass ping pong paddles and kept speaking about searching for bipartisanship?

Yeah, sure this will happen and I'm going to find a job in Canada at age 40+, and move.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I thought the paddles were genius myself. What is it you would have done specifically at the presidents talk. no apples to oranges as the paddles were a thing for his speech and helped fight their willingness to throw folks out.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

More people should have done what Green did. Make them censure the entire Democratic caucus.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

I for one thought the paddles were clever. Im not sure if I can say they were more effective. If they could get themselves all thrown out without making to much of a ruckus. In other words make it were they are thrown out and most people would view it as unfairly. That would do a good job of spotlighting the totalitarian ways. Thing is it has a good chance of failure whereas the paddles will definitely work but to less effect. Believe it or not these are actually the things they weigh when doing things. If I was a male congressman though I would have worn pink somewhere although I may be unaware of some dresscode preventing them since women tend to get more leeway with things like that in formal precedings.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I wouldn't be surprised if this is what Trump wants.

He'll argue (or will be told to argue rather) that the constitution mandates that Congress does this job. He'll then use that as an excuse to dissolve congresss by means of the supreme court.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

If he needs an excuse to do something he will always just manufacture one, so worrying about some action against him giving him that excuse is pointless and will only serve to hamstring any resistance to him. It's time to throw everything at the wall until enough sticks to tear it down.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago

Ive been far too optimistic in the past.

I think shutting down the government is a great idea. People won't work if they don't get paid. A week or two? Maybe. A month? Less likely. But beyond that? No way.

But that's the part I can't be optimistic about. The DNC will reason "it's better that the government keeps running so those employed by the government can keep their source of income." Meanwhile the government workers are paid to destroy the government.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Good. Shut it down. And don't reopen it.

[–] [email protected] 119 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

This is your only real leverage, dems

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

It's like you didn't even see their renegade ping pong paddles

[–] [email protected] 68 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Shhhh. They'll notice and cave.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 weeks ago

Oh people, they already did. We just don’t know yet

load more comments
view more: next ›