this post was submitted on 16 Feb 2025
441 points (99.6% liked)

politics

20368 readers
3280 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 51 points 6 days ago

Unions, collective bargaining and striking were illegal, to begin with. People actually skipped work and meals to strike, form unions, and radically protest to give us these things. Before pto, unemployment insurance, and social safety nets existed.

[–] [email protected] 60 points 6 days ago (7 children)

Fucking strike anyway. What are they gonna do?

[–] [email protected] 40 points 6 days ago (3 children)

The postal service is unable to legally strike. They struck in the 70s (?) illegally and got tons of concessions and no one went to prison for it. Seems like teachers could do something similar. We wouldn’t miss cops and, unfortunately, firefighters also wouldn’t be missed (we still love them, unlike cops).

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 86 points 1 week ago (3 children)

The ruling class forgets how the unions were the compromise to allow them to keep their heads attached to their bodies

[–] [email protected] 44 points 6 days ago

I don't think they've forgotten. They're just confident that the culture war trap they've built will keep us busy fighting amongst ourselves.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Americants won't do anything about it

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 6 days ago

would be a shame if EMS were slow to respond to an emergent need for medical care for one Utah governor. why did they think this was a good idea??

[–] [email protected] 36 points 1 week ago

Wow…this is gonna make America so great

[–] [email protected] 40 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Let the buildings burn down. Firefighters don’t have to use a union to show why the working class is the real source of power.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 57 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Isn't that functionally banning unions altogether? Collective bargaining is the whole purpose of a union...

Not familiar with American union laws, but that's protected federally is it not? (aside from the fact that this administration isn't 'protecting' anything, let alone unions)

[–] [email protected] 23 points 6 days ago (2 children)

If we can't bargain legally I suppose we just need to remind them why they gave us a legal option for union organization in the first place.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago
[–] [email protected] 55 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Given the current political climate nothing is illegal.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 73 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

The police certainly had this coming, although I now feel very bad for firefighters and teachers in Utah

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 118 points 1 week ago (2 children)

He included police unions? He's fucked. Republican voters don't give a crap about teachers or firefighters, but he messed with the cops that they vehemently pretend to support.

[–] [email protected] 79 points 1 week ago (5 children)

They originally tried to exempt police unions but were told that would be too blatantly illegal and the whole thing would be struck down, so they did this instead.

[–] [email protected] 39 points 1 week ago

My money is the police unions will just ignore this; or even more on brand, they'll invent some new with that just means collective bargaining, but only for police.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›