this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2025
439 points (99.3% liked)

World News

36900 readers
424 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Twenty years after Jeffrey Epstein was exposed for his child sex abuse enterprise, the Justice Department this week made a startling revelation. Rather than the “dozens” of victims previously alleged by the government and media, Justice now says that there were “over one thousand” victims.

Source

top 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

People are still talking about this creep? Jeez, time to move on people... clearly nothing to see here.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago

I guess a few people didn't detect your joke.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago

If there's one thing I know, it's that if anyone sends the list to Ken Klippenstein he will publish it.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 day ago

We all joke, but the people in charge clearly do whatever the fuck they want and then sweep it under the rug when/if it becomes public.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 day ago (1 children)

no, no, there was no Epstein at all!

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago

There was no Epstein, only files about him, no there aren't, and if we had any tapes, don't you think we'd show you, except there are tapes, except they don't show stuff

[–] [email protected] 54 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Justice says it reviewed “more than 300 gigabytes of data and physical evidence,” including “over ten thousand downloaded videos and images of illegal child sex abuse material.”

I refuse to believe that 300GB of material yielded no additional suspects.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago

Who said they were looking for suspects?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

He *aped all if them, all by himself.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Satan should invent a new, deeper layer of hell for this guy.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Would he even arrive in hell? To my knowledge, God (at least of the old testament) never really condemned sexual assault/rape or hurting children (the latter is even encouraged - "spare the rod, spoil the child", the binding of Isaac, etc.). A rapist could marry his victim as a "punishment" (as long as she's single, otherwise if she was another man's property, both her and the rapist should die)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

Depending on the flavor of abrahamic religions, all you need to do is either believe in God or believe and do works by God. So sin isn't so much what sends people to hell, or everyone would be there. I would doubt the actions of someone like Epstein, despite populist opinions on religion, are actions rooted in a religious person.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

And everyone who helped cover up his crimes and those of his accomplices.

Or better yet, we could punish them in real life instead of engaging in fantasy.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago

How are you gonna punish Epstein? He's dead.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Poor guy got his hands full with Kissinger, give him a break

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Kissinger is probably four degrees of separation from Epstein at the most and that's assuming Epstein had a handler

[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago

Trump is also innocent!

-Trump

[–] [email protected] 133 points 2 days ago (4 children)

With that many, he probably needed to keep track. Maybe with a list of his clients or something?

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I'm surprised they didn't go for their signature move.

"Here's the list. Aheam:

  • Biden
  • Biden
  • Biden
  • Clinton

... "

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Clinton was almost certainly on there. If the list ever dropped both the Dems and repubs are going to lose some of their celebrities.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Regardless of party. Everyone needs to pay the price. Fucking with kids gets your ass beat in prison. Should be the same outside of the cell.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago

I agree, but I also believe there's a 0% chance of a former president going to jail no matter what he did.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

So what? Bring it. All of it.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago

You'll get no argument from me. I'm saying "Clinton is in the list" is probably more than just right wing propaganda.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Very much not happy about the situation

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

20 bucks is 20 bucks.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago

and reports at the time showed he had a phone book

[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 days ago

Maybe even a private jet? Or a secret island in the Caribbean? Couldn’t be…

[–] [email protected] 79 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I’ve seen that list in person and let me tell you it doesn’t exist.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Whoa, was the list on your desk?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago

Perhaps. Or not. We’ll never know. Or will we? Perhaps.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 days ago

Ken Klippenstein is a gem.