this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2025
715 points (98.9% liked)

Not The Onion

17195 readers
1050 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 4 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I've never seen such a clear-cut case of fucking crazy eyes in a "man:"

[–] [email protected] 2 points 13 hours ago

That's drug induced and you cannot convince me it isn't.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 17 hours ago

What a bitch.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 day ago (1 children)

government of fragile masculinities

[–] [email protected] 2 points 17 hours ago

So wait... It's not Tiny Dick Syndrome?

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Enforcing polygraph testing will invariably make people less trusting of you. There needs to specific reasons that target specific people.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 17 hours ago

As if anyone trusted Patel anyway.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 day ago

literally a 30 rock episode

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago

should polygraph about his crazy eyes.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 2 days ago

What a dork-ass loser.

[–] [email protected] 37 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Is polygraph test reliable ? Doesn't it fall under pseudoscience ?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 hours ago

It's more of an anxiety-detector. It has no basis in fact.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 16 hours ago

It measures things accurately but this has absolutely nothing to do with identifying if someone is telling the truth or not.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You can even train to beat them, so it’s definitely not a reliable method.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

And, I would assume, if anyone had done that training it would be FBI agents.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 17 hours ago

Lol right? This seems more like a "can you beat a polygraph test" test, than a loyalty test

[–] [email protected] 36 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It is not reliable at all, and yes, it is widely considered to be psuedoscience. Yes, this is a batshit insane scenario

[–] [email protected] 4 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

Yes, morons still believe in it, yes, he is a moron.

That and just looking for an excuse.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 day ago

The “original” snowflakes. “I can’t drink from the same water fountain as a colored person!” Type of people.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yes I support the United States Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic 😏

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

And the ones behind the FBI director's back.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

At this point, we're gonna end up have two "congress", two "supreme court", two "president". Two groups of people having their own definitions and interpretations of what "The Constitution" means.

A Divided States of America

Coming soon in the 2029 season of ~~USA~~ DSA (Divided States of America)

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

I welcome that. It is better than living in the Fascist States of America for the rest of my life.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

What a damned candy ass lol

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

This is great news. This means they are think he is regarded.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I don't think so.

They're weeding out non-loyalists because the fascism is going to be ratcheted up tremendously, and for that to happen, they need people without a conscience. True believers.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Republicans/Conservatives in a nutshell.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 days ago

All these fascists are such little weeny piss babies.

And all the alpha bros look up to them, how embarrassing.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Good thing polygraphs are junk science that doesn't work literally at all.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 days ago

Good thing the system already selects for people that can pass polygraphs without much issue.
It is also junk technology.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Isn't the FBI trained to beat polygraphs though?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

Only in as much as they know it’s bunk that only works if the participant believes it does.

load more comments
view more: next ›