this post was submitted on 28 Feb 2024
750 points (96.2% liked)

Comic Strips

17086 readers
938 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
750
Sealioning (lemmy.world)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
(page 6) 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Hee hee. I feel like the one being sealioned most of the time. It doesn't matter what I say, "I should like to have a reasonable debate about what you said. What proof do you have that this has ever happened, and if you don't say something I like I'll be back again to hound you about it until you validate me in a way that I sorely need."

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

There's a joke that goes

I am Firm; You are Obstinate; He is a Pig-headed Fool.

By analogy,

I'm challenging offensive assumptions; you're asking stupid questions; he's sealioning.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 77 points 1 year ago (66 children)

Is there a difference between sealioning and just asking for verification of a bold claim? On a forum such as Lemmy, where people are encouraged to have unsolicited debate in the comments, are we by nature immune from the worst aspects of sealioning?

[–] [email protected] 107 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

There is. Sealioning is when you know damn well your position is wrong or otherwise odious, but rather than confront that point (or come right out and say it) you instead pester the other party incessantly to support every single little claim they make with the usually unspoken implication that everyone should think those claims are false.

The difference is that individuals engaging in Sealioning are not doing so in good faith, and the acid test comes about pretty quickly they they don't address or digest any of the points you've supported with evidence/sources and instead move the goalposts immediately and pivot to quibbling about something else and demanding a source for that, instead.

Another Sealioning trick is to fixate on something you said or take it out of context, build a straw man of your argument, and demand evidence/sources for the argument you did not technically make -- ideally, a straw man argument that is deliberately unsupportable, or is attacking a matter of your opinion and not a fact but treating it as if it should be supported by citations and evidence. E.g., I don't like Metallica because I think Lars Ulrich is a douchebag. Sealion: "Excuse me, but can you provide a source attesting to Lars Ulruch personally being a douchebag to you?" No, I just don't like him because he rubs me the wrong way plus the whole Napster thing back in the day. "Well, since you have not addressed my polite request for a source attesting to Lars Ulrich personally being a douche to you, [ignoring the supportable claim about the Napster thing] your opinion about not like Metallica is obviously laughably absurd [and therefore you are deserving of the ridicule and inserts I am about to heap on you, or will direct others to make at you]." Etc.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (65 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I wonder if Malki finds the coining of this term to be his greatest accomplishment. I know I would.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 year ago (5 children)

It's a clever method of trolling. But if you come prepared and/or are willing to put some effort in, you actually can wreck them with evidence and sound arguments that shuts them completely up.

This is very satisfying.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Care to provide any evidence to support this claim? I would like to have a civil discussion with you about this. /s

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (13 children)

Just an anecdotal account. I was expressing my own experiences and how they make me feel, for which it would be challenging and largely unnecessary to provide evidence to a random dumbass on the internet, yes?

/not s, an example

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It's also frustrating because there are people who are sincerely trying to discuss in good faith while having a different opinion, which is camouflage for the sealion trolls.

Of course, people increasingly forget about the former group completely, and react with hostility... It's understandable, but unfortunate for healthy discussion.

At least in your case, your response is to lay out robust arguments to explain your position, which is productive regardless of whether they're trolling or sincere. I've learned a great deal over the years from strangers on the internet putting a clinic on someone who may or may not have been trolling.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Accusing people of “sealioning” is a great way to not have to defend or discuss poorly thought out or sourced claims.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So, the issue is that behaviorwise they're indistinguishable from each other.

Intentionally or unintentionally ignoring signals that a person isn't interested in debate or discussion with you is just as annoying to the person being bothered either way.

It doesn't matter if your intentions are sincere or not when you decide to pester someone into a debate they're not interested in having.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah true, the persistent pestering component is arguably always trolling. I guess that's one of the signals that you can use to distinguish.

I can still think of gray areas, but I guess that's why it's effective camouflage.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 55 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sealioning is a type of trolling or harassment that consists of pursuing people with relentless requests for evidence, often tangential or previously addressed, while maintaining a pretense of civility and sincerity, and feigning ignorance of the subject matter.

Often the troll will just shift slightly and keep making demands regardless of evidence.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (11 children)

Don't let them dictate the convo. You can assert control as well, don't let them lead uncontested.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 year ago (5 children)

This is why we need seal clubbing

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Pardon me, I couldn't help but overhear...

Would you mind showing me evidence of any negative thing any sea lion has ever done to you?

I'm just curious if you have any sources to back up your opinion that seal lions need clubbing.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

Beat and kill them while they're young and innocent before they become well informed, intelligent adults that can counter and challenge your firmly held beliefs?

[–] [email protected] 35 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I don’t know. They stay out too late, get way too drunk and make a terrible racket when they get home.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›