this post was submitted on 18 Jun 2025
1232 points (99.8% liked)

Technology

71986 readers
2943 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 week ago

If it had vtech and a fart cannon it would have hit 600m.

[–] [email protected] 102 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Anything that erodes SpaceX's monopoly is good for me

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago (14 children)

Unfortunately, the next competitor will be Amazon...

And then we'll see what happens next, getting a whole constellation up is no small feat, I can't see a third company getting a system working before 2050.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I know Blue Horizon or whatever it's called has had minor success with rockets. What's stopping Honda from out-competing them? Could it be a funding problem? (I know Blue Horizon has a lot of Amazon funding)

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
[–] [email protected] 37 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This wasn't much more than a toy rocket:

6.3 m in length, 85 cm in diameter,
The test was completed successfully, the first time Honda landed a rocket after reaching an altitude of nearly 300 meters.

But still they were successful on their first try, so we will have to see where they take it from here. 🚀

[–] [email protected] 38 points 1 week ago (4 children)

It's proof of tech. It'd be stupid and wasteful to do all the tests on a full size rocket.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)

There’s a YouTube channel called BPS Space where this guy spent 7 years learning how to land a model rocket space x style. He talked about how much you can learn about real rocket science even from a small model.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=SH3lR2GLgT0

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Genuinely curious: how many explosions before the successful test?

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Apparently they got it right on the first try.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Idk, looks more like Hitachi

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 week ago

I wanna buy one and see what it can do with an old 4 cylinder VTEC out of a Civic Si.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago (2 children)

What the F is every corporation's boner with rockets? 🚀

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Because the last stage of existence on this planet. Will be febel plans to try and colonize other planets. Because our planet will start to poison us as a defensive mechanism. All of these Corporations need a plan to get off planet.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

The planet isn't doing anything, we are poisoning ourselves. Or as lemmy puts it "big evil corporations (which we support everyday because it's cheaper than buying local/sustainable) are poisoning us".

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Imo it's a good thing tho. Spreading our civilization across multiple planets is the only way to guarantee long long term success. Obviously we should also fix the climate change issue (and many others). But still, being spread across the solar system would give our species redundancy. An extinction event on earth like a large meteor strike would no longer be the end.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yes, let spend money to fuck up other planets as well instead of saving this one. /s

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

That’s exactly what they will say.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It would take a lot to make Mars more habitable than Earth. This isn't about colonisation this is simply that it's cool to build rockets.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yeah, it's easier to terraform ... Planet Earth!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

It's the only planet we can terraform (As in repairing some of the damage we've done), we are nowhere near able to terraform Mars, not even theoretically and disregarding cost.
Maybe in a century we can. But only maybe.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

Feeble? But I think you meant futile? Idk.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›