this post was submitted on 27 Feb 2024
309 points (99.0% liked)

politics

18789 readers
2741 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago

This makes me wonder if they've figured out how to deal with Trump and the bad faith far right: do the same shit they do so they dig their own hole. Lie to them as much as possible where there's no consequences, then don't only drop the ball when they try to pass it to you when it matters, but act like you have no idea what the ball is even for.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 months ago

What all these articles miss is that the guy made less money working on this case than he did in private practice the year before. Dude was a partner at a law firm, government work doesn't pay well at all.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 6 months ago
[–] [email protected] 36 points 6 months ago (1 children)

If Republicans had attentions spans, they'd be so pissed right now

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

If those kids weren't still embryos they couldn't read.

Did I do it right?

[–] [email protected] 47 points 6 months ago (6 children)

Republicans need a new playbook. Simply fabricating lies based on heresay, unvetted 'sources' and rumors just doesn't cut it anymore.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 months ago

Simply fabricating lies based on heresay, unvetted 'sources' and rumors just doesn't cut it anymore.

You mean the basis of their entire religion?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 months ago

They won't ever understand that it won't cut it in court, though. They think the Democrats are weaponizing the court system to try to destroy them, hence the convictions of all the Jan 6 insurrectionists, and the dumpster fire that is Trump's legal life. And they think it, because they want to and have wanted to do exactly that: use the courts to destroy their opposition. So they don't understand why when they make this up (which again, they think the Democrats are doing) it doesn't hold up in court.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 months ago (1 children)

You say that, but it works great against their voting base.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Their voter base is "phasing out:" https://www.statista.com/statistics/319068/party-identification-in-the-united-states-by-generation/ (you'd think that they would value universal healthcare more)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

You mean like the Medicare they have to use at 65?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago

It cuts it if it allows Turnip Dump to stay on the ballot

[–] [email protected] 23 points 6 months ago (1 children)

All they were doing was wasting time and it accomplished that

[–] [email protected] 10 points 6 months ago

Was just thinking: sounds awfully like how a false rape accusation fuxks up the life of the accused for shits and giggles. There should be penalties, except that they'd just claim they were just 'acting on information they received' and claim due diligence isn't their responsibility. It's all bullshit.

[–] [email protected] 69 points 6 months ago

This whole thing is a distraction for the Republican base, so there's less coverage of the trial and they feel vindicated in (inevitably) ignoring any possible convictions or plea deals.

[–] [email protected] 47 points 6 months ago (2 children)

They are going to have to invent new terms for the amount of fucked Mike Roman is about to be.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 6 months ago

Moron should've taken the plea deal. They offered him a misdemeanor with probation. For participating in a friggin coup attempt. He chose "stick my dick in a hornet's nest" instead.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago

Me, I'm looking forward to it. Hope he gets his comeuppance.

[–] [email protected] 101 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Hmm... It's sounds almost like a planned delay in Mr. Drumpf's case...

[–] [email protected] 26 points 6 months ago

and like Bradley had an axe to grind with Wade.