this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2025
146 points (96.2% liked)

politics

24746 readers
2633 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 days ago

Yeah you can fuck yourself with a rusty pitchfork. I'd prefer death over those shitty hours.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 days ago

I mean this is just how you get any real talent with any real mobility to use that mobility to leave.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago (9 children)

996 work culture isn't for everyone - or even most people. But if someone wants to start a company doing something they love and work that much, I say go for it. I started a company, albeit I only work 60/week, doing something I love and working with my family. It isn't the only way, but is the way that works for us. 🤷

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 days ago

I'm fine with that, it just sounds like these people think they can commodify that kind of dedication in exchange for much less than what you got creating your own.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 3 days ago

We don’t need a society of billion dollar startups, and we don’t need cunts like him using our oxygen.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 days ago

The rich are ripping the copper out of the walls of society before it all comes crashing down. They burn out employees, throw them away and hire fresh ones. Who cares, they're not planning of any of this lasting much longer.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 3 days ago

Screw all Venture capitalist. They destroy everything they touch. Why should a worker give all they've got just to get screwed in the end?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

He might be right, but if he wants me to work more than 5 days a week then I would expect to be compensated accordingly. Otherwise he can fuck off.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 30 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Meanwhile, some places have been trying out 4-day 8 hour days, and have found that they retain competent staff who have fewer accidents and make fewer errors, increasing company productivity while reducing wage spend.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, I'd rather pay for clear-minded hours of a worker, rather than near-burnout hours. But the guy doesn't care, he's trying to compete by saving in wages...at the frontline of tech. It makes no sense either way.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago

But it literally did.

[–] [email protected] 59 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Yeah, you can go fuck yourself with your 7 day work week.

[–] [email protected] 48 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

What I don't get is...they can just hire more people to do the work and expand the company? When you consider this, you realize that they're just asking people to work 40% more without an increase in pay (hence hiring more people is not an option)...then they call it "productivity gains".

[–] [email protected] -4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (6 children)

they can just hire more people

In software development, it's not that easy. Having multiple people working on the same code adds a lot of overhead. Also, finding another excellent programmer is slow and expensive. (The "fast, cheap, good: pick two" rule applies.)

Plus, do you want two software developers with a good work/life balance and fulfilling ways to spend their free time, or do you want one software developer with mental issues that, among other things, leave him with nothing to do except work and no source of meaning in life except getting work done? The first option is more dependable, since the guy in the second option is crazy. However, if you're building a startup then you need to take risks and the second option is the one more likely to create something amazing. (IMO, of course.)

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 29 points 3 days ago

Then they'll complain when no one wants to work those ludicrous hours and they'll sing one of the greatest hits of all time:

"nOBodY WaNts To woRk ANyMorE"

[–] [email protected] 99 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Robber Barons are back in style!

Why is anyone questioning why people want to murder the rich and support social programs more and more. You have just sit and think how much people will take before they absolutely slaughter these fucking pieces of human trash.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 3 days ago

They throw people in concentration camps without any process, much less due process, get giant tax breaks while taking away people's healthcare, layoff thousands of workers while getting a generous bonus, dump toxic waste in the rivers, use 45% of the corn grown to make ethanol that doesn't solve anything, and say there's not enough room for solar panels.

But don't post Luigi memes because that's inciting violence.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›