These people were everyone's hope? LMAO ๐คฃ
this post was submitted on 30 Jan 2025
369 points (97.2% liked)
Technology
67151 readers
4127 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Democrats once again losing on purpose.
Trump is president and this is their priority?
Why wouldn't it be? People's interests don't bring in money
Of course it is, what else would you expect from the controlled opposition party?
Even out of power they still find a way to give hand jobs for industry donations and casually screw the public. I admire their energy.
I'm missing the part where consumers are required to use their ISP DNS. I never do, in favour of CloudFlare DNS, Google DNS, etc
load more comments
(2 replies)
If they are not blocking the access to the WHO.is servers you can get the IP address of the site and add it to your local hosts file.
load more comments
(1 replies)
77 year old who has been in the house since the 90s. Actually a prime example of why we need term limits and real competition in elections (if not from GOP, at least in primaries). Irony is she reps a district that isn't really associated with streaming or producing movies.
My guess? She won her primary because she was the incombent or was unopposed, but she probably receives cash from the film industry. Almost all house seats are uncompetitive unless someone drops out or gets redistricted. Until something changes, this is and will be the way our government continues to work.
in power since the 90s
Oh so carrying the torch for the LAST time they tried to go after media with the moral panic of "Explicit" music label stuff led by Tipper Gore? The one where Twisted Sister showed up in 1985. A continuation from when they had a panic about VHS recordings in 1969 and Mr Rogers testified.
load more comments
(2 replies)
The country is being burned to the ground from the inside by fascists, and this is the hill Democrat politicians choose to die on?!! Holy shit! What a fucking joke!
load more comments
(1 replies)
This is some dumb shit.
invest in VPN providers
I'm guessing lofgren has already done that
Wait until they start "the VPN wars". it's invariable at this point. Only the VPN that has bribed The Emperor the most will survive.
load more comments
(2 replies)
Democrats: "Please for the love of God, don't vote for us ever again! We really, really don't want to win."
load more comments
(4 replies)
Article 1) Streaming prices going up Article 2) websites being blocked
oh cool, tackling the key issues facing us right now
@some_guy is there such a thing as an open source dns and encrypted DNS? Or federated DNS?
I use a self hosted pihole for DNS. It needs an upstream DNS server for resolving unchached dns's. I have pihole point to quad9 then cloudflair then google then I have it point to a bunch of unfiltered DNS servers across the world.
Pihole also let's you install unbound. Your own recursive resolver. So you don't have to rely on google or quad9 etc.
Cool I might do that. I assume I can find a docker compose somewhere.
They're absolutely is, it's called onion routing, get around DNS blocks with tor as long as you know where you're going.
It's actually surprisingly centralized.
It sort if have to be. In the end there has to be one source of truth for each TLD, otherwise who is to say who owns foo.com, and what it resolves to?
And then the same structure for assigning TLD ownership.
But there is nothing stopping you from running another DNS service, call it DNS2 with different root servers, etc. It is just going to be extemely hard to convince people to use it.
Lofgren is a corporate stooge is the message I'm getting.
After the US does this, Europe will be soon to follow guaranteed, then everyone will be trying to pipe through the same VPN exit server in Barbados
We already have site blocking in France.
This somehow reads with the same energy as those "please don't download scientific papers for free from , that would be so terrible" posts.
Really uh...
Setting themselves up for success uh..
Great to see our representatives finally focusing on the real issues in these difficult times.
load more comments
(4 replies)