this post was submitted on 12 Jan 2025
200 points (90.3% liked)

Science Memes

11586 readers
1098 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 45 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago

…is this gain?

[–] [email protected] 42 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Assuming this has a 47 hydrogens stuck on to make it stable, I'd call it:

3-methyl-3,4,5,5,6-pentaethyl-6-buta-2-yl decane

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I am a total chem nitwit, would you like to explain me how you come to this ?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 days ago

It basically comes down to finding the longest chain of carbons, then you number each of the carbons on that chain and list off things that are attached to that carbon. For example, 1 carbon = methyl, 2 carbons = ethyl, etc.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 days ago (1 children)

dodecane has a 12 carbon chain. The longest chain here is 10 carbons, which would be decane.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

Good catch.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 2 days ago

The urge to add hydrogens to all the carbons not fully bonded is overwhelming

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Can someone explain this to me? I don’t get it, but I want to.

[–] [email protected] 113 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Oh by fucking gods. It's loss. People are STILL posting loss. And here I was thinking this was a chemistry meme.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

Carbonated loss

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Personally I can't wait for this meme to be dead and forgotten

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago

Like that baby

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah, me too. I've never even read the webcomic. Can we please just forget about it already?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago

Loss will live until the last soulless, inspiration destitute and desperately unfunny aging millennial dies a miserable and ugly death.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago
[–] [email protected] 42 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Couldn’t resist. In a more standard form this molecule should (I believe—chemistry has been a long time ago) look like this:

Made with MolView –https://molview.org/?smiles=C%28%5BC%40%5D%28CC%29%28C%29C%28CC%29%5BC%40%5D%28CC%29%28CC%29%5BC%40%40%5D%28C%28C%29C%29%28CC%29CCCC%29C

People knowledgeable in chemistry, please correct!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Change/Invert the steric centers at 3 or 6 and it should be fine.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 days ago

If I ever teach chemistry to kids imma tell them to name this

[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 days ago

My stoned ass thought this was a shifter tree diagram of a goofy little manual transmission for a sec. All gears are just 'crash', lol

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

3-metilhexa-4,5,5,6,7,7-etil-4-butil From the head, im feel happy now

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 days ago

I'm at a loss

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

OK how long until it kicks in?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

a few years and then you die of cancer

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

*Cccccccccccccccccccccccccancer

[–] [email protected] 48 points 2 days ago (6 children)

So ... What does this chemical make you lose?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

Positive thoughts and other particles with a positive charge.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 days ago
[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago

You lose nothing, don't worry about it.

On the other hand, you learn C (the programming language) by ingesting it, which would be considered a punishment by some.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 2 days ago
[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago

It makes you lose your way in a vast endless c

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 days ago

Your marbles.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I somehow recognized it immediately. I think this meme has rewritten my brain.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago

Ah ok so it's Loss got it

[–] [email protected] 72 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Fixed the charge on your 3-methyl-3,4,5,5,6-pentaethyl-6-butan-2-yl decane ion, aka lossane.

(It's been a while since I last did chemistry, so apologies if I messed up the nomenclature a bit)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Any idea what a molecule like that would be useful for?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 19 hours ago

Fuel? Hydrocarbons like that are quite combustible.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

actually we start numbering by minimising the number of highest order addition, which is the isobutyl, if it gets same number regardless, then we try to minimise the sum of numbers, so i think it should be called

5-(isobutyl)-5,6,6,7,8-penta-ethyl-8-methyl-decane (I am assuming hydrogen's are present, just not represented, because that usually is the case)

I may alo be wrong here, it has been 4 years since I have been required to do nomenclature myself

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Ah, my chemistry department taught me the other way around. I distinctly remember the phrase "methyl-ethyl" being thrown around a bit. Additionaly, we were taught to be more specific about isomers, hence me using butan-2-yl instead of isobutyl.

Then again, scientists often disagree strongly about things like this, so we could both be right. Also, there's a good chance this is just the A-Level specification being weird. I left my old textbook at my student flat, though, so I won't be able to check for a couple of weeks.

I could also be downright wrong myself.

As for the hydrogens, I had assumed they were not present, and that this lossane molecule is an ion with a charge of -50. This is borderline impossible to achieve in real life, of course.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Now i remember we also had to specify what isobutyl (technically just 1 isobutyl exists (not counting stereoisomers), and other form would be tertbutyl). But giving highest priority and minimising sum were definitely something we were taught.

I was free enough to look it up this time - IUPAC guidelines for organic chem - https://iupac.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/Organic-Brief-Guide-brochure_v1.1_June2021.pdf (or more generally https://iupac.org/what-we-do/nomenclature/brief-guides/)

Section 7 ( c ) Lowest locant(s) for principal characteristic group(s)

Although I also remember just as we completed our unit on nomenclature, all we got was "common names", now i was supposed to know of the top of my head what a cumene is (which I think is isopropyl benzene (not going to check this one)). Same thing happened with polymers, we were taught IUPAC, and then again, "industrial names"

[–] [email protected] 29 points 2 days ago

As someone who paid enough attention in highschool chemistry to get a B, and occasionally watches Nile(red/blue) and E&I videos.... I know some of these words/symbols!

[–] [email protected] 22 points 3 days ago

(1,2,2,50)-loss-quinquagintinane