this post was submitted on 11 Mar 2024
179 points (83.8% liked)

Not The Onion

12314 readers
391 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 104 points 8 months ago (3 children)

To be honest even if it was a power plant... they're already in the business of generating power. If generating more clean power in the same space is an option, that sounds great

[–] [email protected] 30 points 8 months ago

Yeah, and nuclear reactors use a lot of electrical power anyway. When they're first starting they need to draw a lot from the grid and they all have powerful backup generators and battery banks to keep the systems online in the event they need to suddenly shutdown the reactor.

The implausible thing would actually be getting approval to put the panels up, since reactors have high standards for checking the consequences of different materials being used on-site.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

It's free real estate ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

[–] [email protected] 50 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Power plants still need power to operate and even your own supply is not free.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago

That’s how we got Chernobyl, and part of why Fukushima melted (because the backup generation was under the tsunami).